• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住房和个性对奶牛判断和注意偏差的影响。

Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows.

机构信息

Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01843-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-01843-w
PMID:34836990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8626508/
Abstract

Affective states can be inferred from responses to ambiguous and threatening stimuli, using Judgement Bias Tasks (JBTs) and Attention Bias Tasks (ABTs). We investigated the separate and interactive effects of personality and housing conditions on dairy cattle affective states. We assessed personality in 48 heifers using Open-Field, Novel-Object and Runway tests. Personality effects on responses to the JBT and to the ABT were examined when heifers were housed under reference conditions. Heifers were subsequently housed under positive or negative conditions, and housing effects on animal responses in both tasks were investigated while controlling for personality. A Principal Component Analysis revealed three personality traits labelled Activity, Fearfulness and Sociability. Under reference conditions, personality influenced heifers' responses to the JBT and to the ABT, therefore questioning the tasks' generalizability across individuals. Against expectations, housing did not influence responses to the  JBT and heifers in the negative conditions looked at the threat later than heifers in the positive or reference conditions. More research is warranted to confirm the validity and the repeatability of the JBT and of the ABT as appropriate measures of affective states in dairy cows.

摘要

情绪状态可以通过判断偏差任务 (JBT) 和注意偏差任务 (ABT) 对模棱两可和威胁性刺激的反应来推断。我们研究了个性和住房条件对奶牛情绪状态的单独和交互影响。我们使用开阔地、新物体和跑道测试对 48 头小母牛进行了个性评估。当小母牛在参考条件下饲养时,研究了个性对 JBT 和 ABT 反应的影响。随后,小母牛被安置在积极或消极的环境中,并在控制个性的情况下研究了环境对两种任务中动物反应的影响。主成分分析揭示了三个个性特征,分别是活动性、恐惧和社交性。在参考条件下,个性影响小母牛对 JBT 和 ABT 的反应,因此质疑这些任务在个体之间的通用性。出乎意料的是,住房条件并没有影响小母牛对 JBT 的反应,而且处于消极环境中的小母牛比处于积极环境或参考环境中的小母牛更晚地观察到威胁。需要进一步的研究来确认 JBT 和 ABT 作为评估奶牛情绪状态的适当方法的有效性和可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/2fb036c8616c/41598_2021_1843_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/0ac3e73576e6/41598_2021_1843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/68234b2ab978/41598_2021_1843_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/dc9bd26946d5/41598_2021_1843_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/2fb036c8616c/41598_2021_1843_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/0ac3e73576e6/41598_2021_1843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/68234b2ab978/41598_2021_1843_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/dc9bd26946d5/41598_2021_1843_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa10/8626508/2fb036c8616c/41598_2021_1843_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows.住房和个性对奶牛判断和注意偏差的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01843-w.
2
Developing a feasible and sensitive judgement bias task in dairy cows.开发一种可行且敏感的奶牛判断偏差任务。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):425-445. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01563-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
3
Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare.群体饲养妊娠母猪的判断偏差可通过行为特征预测,但不能通过福利的物理测量来预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264258. eCollection 2022.
4
Effect of grouping on behaviour of dairy heifers and cows in the transition period.分组对奶牛过渡时期行为的影响。
J Dairy Res. 2021 Feb;88(1):45-51. doi: 10.1017/S0022029921000066. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Assessing the emotional states of dairy cows housed with or without their calves.评估与小牛同圈或不同圈饲养的奶牛的情绪状态。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Feb;107(2):1085-1101. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23720. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Toward on-farm measurement of personality traits and their relationships to behavior and productivity of grazing dairy cattle.针对放牧奶牛的个性特征及其与行为和生产性能的关系进行农场实地测量。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jul;105(7):6055-6069. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21249. Epub 2022 May 28.
7
Introducing heifers to freestall housing.将小母牛引入散栏牛舍。
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):1900-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3994.
8
Physical development, ease of integration into the dairy herd and performance of primiparous dairy cows reared with full whole-day, half-day or no mother-contact as calves.初生牛犊期完全、半天地或无母接触饲养对奶牛初产奶牛的身体发育、适应牛群和生产性能的影响。
J Dairy Res. 2020 Aug;87(S1):154-156. doi: 10.1017/S002202992000059X.
9
Field survey to evaluate space allowances for dairy cows in Great Britain.英国奶牛空间分配的实地调查评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3745-3759. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17004. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris).影响犬(Canis familiaris)在判断偏差任务中表现的人格特质。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25224-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring minds: Understanding the mental states of dairy cattle in different management conditions.测量心智:了解不同管理条件下奶牛的心理状态。
JDS Commun. 2025 Mar 3;6(3):479-483. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0712. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Trait sensitivity to stress and cognitive bias processes in fish: A brief overview.鱼类对压力的特质敏感性和认知偏差过程:简要概述。
Personal Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;7:e3. doi: 10.1017/pen.2023.14. eCollection 2024.
3
Non-human contributions to personality neuroscience: From fish through primates - a concluding editorial overview.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.奶牛的乐观情绪与牧场使用情况
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x.
2
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动物的乐观、悲观与判断偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药物干预判断偏差:系统综述和荟萃分析。
非人类对人格神经科学的贡献:从鱼类到灵长类——一篇总结性的编辑综述。
Personal Neurosci. 2024 Feb 6;7:e5. doi: 10.1017/pen.2024.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Social contact from birth influences personality traits of group-housed dairy calves.从出生起的社交接触会影响群居奶牛犊的性格特征。
JDS Commun. 2023 Aug 19;4(6):484-488. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0383. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Do cows see the forest or the trees? A preliminary investigation of attentional scope as a potential indicator of emotional state in dairy cows housed with their calves.奶牛看到的是整片森林还是树木?对注意力范围作为与小牛一起饲养的奶牛情绪状态潜在指标的初步调查。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 28;10:1257055. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1257055. eCollection 2023.
6
Use of qualitative behavioural assessment to investigate affective states of housed dairy cows under different environmental conditions.运用定性行为评估法调查不同环境条件下圈养奶牛的情绪状态。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Mar 17;10:1099170. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1099170. eCollection 2023.
7
Repeatability of an attention bias test for sheep suggests variable influence of state and trait affect on behaviour.绵羊注意偏向测试的可重复性表明状态和特质影响对行为的影响具有可变性。
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 2;11:e14730. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14730. eCollection 2023.
8
Limitations of Spatial Judgment Bias Test Application in Horses ().马匹空间判断偏差测试应用的局限性()。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;12(21):3014. doi: 10.3390/ani12213014.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:269-286. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
4
Effects of early and later life environmental enrichment and personality on attention bias in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).早期和后期生活环境丰容以及个性对猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)注意偏向的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):959-972. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01287-w. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Review: Individual variability in feeding behaviour of domesticated ruminants.综述:家养反刍动物摄食行为的个体差异。
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s419-s430. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001325. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Mood and personality interact to determine cognitive biases in pigs.情绪和个性相互作用,决定猪的认知偏差。
Biol Lett. 2016 Nov;12(11). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0402.
7
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELL-BEING SYMPOSIUM: Interaction between coping style/personality, stress, and welfare: Relevance for domestic farm animals.动物行为与福利研讨会:应对方式/个性、应激与福利之间的相互作用:对家养农场动物的相关性
J Anim Sci. 2016 Jun;94(6):2284-96. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0125.
8
Attention bias to threat indicates anxiety differences in sheep.对威胁的注意偏向表明绵羊存在焦虑差异。
Biol Lett. 2016 Jun;12(6). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0977. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Effects of stocking density on behavior, productivity, and comfort indices of lactating dairy cows.饲养密度对泌乳奶牛行为、生产性能及舒适度指标的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):3709-3717. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10098. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Mood as Representation of Momentum.情绪作为动量的表征。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;20(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Nov 3.