Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Social Work, School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):869-887. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13586. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Expanding on the limited work in supportive care for friends and family caregivers of adults with a primary brain tumour, this review sought to examine all available evidence since 2010 on the efficacy and feasibility of supportive interventions for this population including non-controlled studies. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the feasibility and effectiveness/efficacy of supportive interventions for brain cancer caregivers in line with PRISMA guidelines. 13 studies met the eligibility criteria and were identified for inclusion. Most interventions employed tailored psychoeducation, and expert involvement via psychotherapy or care coordination. Only two interventions demonstrated clinically significant improvements. Findings indicate that dyadic yoga programs, and programs that enhance caregiver mastery to manage patient behavioural problems, may lead to improvements in some clinical outcomes. Results highlight the diverse nature of supportive interventions and indicate that support for primary brain tumour caregivers is currently suboptimal. Our findings illustrate an overall low certainty of evidence, with a need for more adequately powered randomised controlled trials. As the complexities of brain cancer care-giving are an obstacle to standardised interventions, this review underscores the need for future trials to incorporate complimentary qualitative research methodologies.
在支持成人原发性脑肿瘤朋友和家属照顾者的有限工作基础上,本综述旨在检验自 2010 年以来针对该人群的支持性干预措施的所有现有证据,包括非对照研究。根据 PRISMA 指南,对脑癌照顾者支持性干预措施的可行性和有效性/效果进行了系统的文献综述。符合入选标准并被确定纳入的研究有 13 项。大多数干预措施采用了量身定制的心理教育,以及通过心理治疗或护理协调提供的专家参与。只有两项干预措施显示出临床显著改善。研究结果表明,夫妻瑜伽项目以及增强照顾者管理患者行为问题能力的项目可能会导致某些临床结果的改善。研究结果突出了支持性干预措施的多样性,并表明目前对原发性脑肿瘤照顾者的支持还不够完善。我们的研究结果表明,总体证据的确定性较低,需要进行更多有足够效力的随机对照试验。由于脑癌护理的复杂性是标准化干预措施的障碍,因此本综述强调未来试验需要纳入补充性定性研究方法。