Suppr超能文献

当前南非两个农业区土壤和空气中的农药使用情况:对环境归宿和人体暴露的影响。

Current use pesticides in soil and air from two agricultural sites in South Africa: Implications for environmental fate and human exposure.

机构信息

Masaryk University, RECETOX Centre, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Masaryk University, RECETOX Centre, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 1):150455. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150455. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Abstract

Concerns about the possible negative impacts of current use pesticides (CUPs) for both the environment and human health have increased worldwide. However, the knowledge on the occurrence of CUPs in soil and air and the related human exposure in Africa is limited. This study investigated the presence of 30 CUPs in soil and air at two distinct agricultural sites in South Africa and estimated the human exposure and related risks to rural residents via soil ingestion and inhalation (using hazard quotients, hazard index and relative potency factors). We collected 12 soil and 14 air samples over seven days during the main pesticide application season in 2018. All samples were extracted, purified and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. In soils, nine CUPs were found, with chlorpyrifos, carbaryl and tebuconazole having the highest concentrations (up to 63.6, 1.10 and 0.212 ng g, respectively). In air, 16 CUPs were found, with carbaryl, tebuconazole and terbuthylazine having the highest levels (up to 25.0, 22.2 and 1.94 pg m, respectively). Spatial differences were observed between the two sites for seven CUPs in air and two in soils. A large dominance towards the particulate phase was found for almost all CUPs, which could be related to mass transport kinetics limitations (non-equilibrium) following pesticide application. The estimated daily intake via soil ingestion and inhalation of individual pesticides ranged from 0.126 fg kg day (isoproturon) to 14.7 ng kg day (chlorpyrifos). Except for chlorpyrifos, soil ingestion generally represented a minor exposure pathway compared to inhalation (i.e. <5%). The pesticide environmental exposure largely differed between the residents of the two distinct agricultural sites in terms of levels and composition. The estimated human health risks due to soil ingestion and inhalation of pesticides were negligible although future studies should explore other relevant pathways.

摘要

人们对当前用于环境和人类健康的农药(CUPs)可能产生的负面影响的担忧在全球范围内不断增加。然而,关于非洲土壤和空气中 CUPs 的存在及其相关人类暴露的知识有限。本研究调查了南非两个不同农业地点的土壤和空气中 30 种 CUPs 的存在情况,并通过土壤摄入和吸入(使用危害商数、危害指数和相对效力因子)来估计农村居民的暴露情况和相关风险。我们在 2018 年主要农药施用季节的七天内采集了 12 个土壤样本和 14 个空气样本。所有样本均通过高效液相色谱-串联质谱法进行提取、净化和分析。在土壤中,发现了九种 CUPs,其中毒死蜱、西维因和戊唑醇的浓度最高(分别高达 63.6、1.10 和 0.212ng/g)。在空气中,发现了 16 种 CUPs,其中西维因、戊唑醇和特丁津的浓度最高(分别高达 25.0、22.2 和 1.94pg/m)。两个地点的七种空气 CUPs 和两种土壤 CUPs 存在空间差异。几乎所有 CUPs 都以颗粒相为主,这可能与农药施用后质量传输动力学限制(非平衡)有关。通过土壤摄入和吸入个别农药的估计每日摄入量从 0.126fg/kg/天(异丙隆)到 14.7ng/kg/天(毒死蜱)不等。除了毒死蜱,土壤摄入一般与吸入相比(即 <5%),暴露途径较小。两个不同农业地点的居民之间,农药环境暴露在水平和组成方面存在很大差异。由于土壤摄入和吸入农药而导致的人类健康风险可以忽略不计,尽管未来的研究应该探索其他相关途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验