Speciality Registrar Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, England.
Consultant Spinal Surgeon, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Injury. 2022 Mar;53(3):1057-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.057. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
Patients sustaining fragility fractures of the C2 odontoid peg have 30-day mortality rates as high as 10% rising up to 34.1% at 1 year. Substantial controversy exists regarding optimal management of these fractures and there is a lack of national guidance to inform best practice. The aim of this study was to determine current practice in the management of these fractures throughout the United Kingdom.
A UK wide, cross sectional survey was conducted, asking 10 questions regarding the initial management, imaging and follow-up of an elderly patient with a type 2 fragility odontoid peg fracture. This was publicised through the British Orthopaedic Association website and sent to all members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) via email.
107 Responses were received. 56% from orthopaedic consultants, 29% from neurosurgical consultants and 15% from senior spine fellows. 86% (92) of respondents choose treatment with a cervical orthosis, with 84% (77) of these opting for a semi rigid Aspen or Philadelphia collar compared to 16% (15) opting for a soft cervical collar. Three (3%) opted for operative intervention with a further three (3%) choosing Halo fixation. Nine respondents (8%) opted for no orthosis and treatment with analgesia alone. Length of immobilisation in cervical orthosis ranged from 6 to 12 weeks. Initial follow-up ranged from 1 week to 6 weeks, with 6% (6) discharged without follow up. There was also marked variation in the use of follow-up imaging with 17% (18) using plain radiographs, 62% (66) requesting lateral flexion / extension radiographs, 10% (11) using CT and 11% (12) not performing any imaging at final follow up. In 60% (64) of cases respondents did not change subsequent management as a result of imaging.
Type-2 fragility peg fractures have high morbidity and mortality. There is marked variation in the treatment modalities used, follow-up regime and use of imaging throughout the UK. Given the rapidly increasing incidence of these injuries and the associated mortality this should be a high priority field for further research. Further large scale studies are urgently required to inform best practice and standardise management of these injuries.
C2 齿状突骨折的脆性骨折患者 30 天死亡率高达 10%,1 年时上升至 34.1%。对于这些骨折的最佳治疗方法存在很大争议,而且缺乏国家指导意见来告知最佳实践。本研究旨在确定英国各地此类骨折的治疗现状。
进行了一项英国范围内的横断面调查,调查了 10 个关于老年 2 型脆性齿状突骨折患者初始治疗、影像学检查和随访的问题。该调查通过英国骨科协会网站发布,并通过电子邮件发送给英国神经外科学会 (SBNS) 的所有成员。
共收到 107 份回复。56%来自骨科顾问,29%来自神经外科顾问,15%来自高级脊柱研究员。86%(92 名)的受访者选择使用颈椎矫形器治疗,其中 84%(77 名)选择使用半刚性 Aspen 或 Philadelphia 领,而 16%(15 名)选择使用软颈领。3 名(3%)选择手术干预,另有 3 名(3%)选择 Halo 固定。9 名(8%)受访者选择不使用矫形器,仅使用镇痛药治疗。在颈椎矫形器中的固定时间从 6 周到 12 周不等。初始随访时间从 1 周到 6 周不等,有 6%(6 名)未进行随访。在使用影像学检查方面也存在明显差异,17%(18 名)使用平片,62%(66 名)要求进行侧屈/伸展位片,10%(11 名)使用 CT,11%(12 名)在最终随访时未进行任何影像学检查。在 60%(64 名)的情况下,由于影像学检查,受访者没有改变后续治疗方案。
2 型脆性 peg 骨折患者的发病率和死亡率较高。在英国,治疗方式、随访方案和影像学使用方面存在明显差异。鉴于这些损伤的发病率迅速增加,以及相关死亡率,这应该是一个高度优先的研究领域。迫切需要进行进一步的大规模研究,为这些损伤的最佳治疗方法提供信息,并使其管理标准化。