Osterhoff Georg, Scholz Matti, Disch Alexander C, Katscher Sebastian, Spiegl Ulrich J A, Schnake Klaus John, Scheyerer Max J
Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
ATOS Orthopaedic Clinic Braunfels, Braunfels, Germany.
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(1_suppl):13S-21S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157316.
Systematic review/expert consensus.
Fractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process.
In a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature.
Based on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted.
Computed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D'Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.
系统评价/专家共识。
枢椎骨折是老年患者脊柱最常见的损伤。手术治疗和非手术治疗均伴有高并发症发生率和死亡率。本文旨在总结关于老年患者齿状突骨折治疗的当前文献,并基于专家共识过程进行权衡。
在一个联合共识过程中,德国骨科与创伤学会(DGOU)脊柱分会的成员旨在为老年患者齿状突骨折的诊断检查和治疗制定建议。基于先前发表的建议,本文是一个更新版本,纳入了对近期文献的系统评价。
根据可得的新数据,对初始共识过程中确立的建议进行了调整。
计算机断层扫描是怀疑上颈椎损伤患者的诊断标准。Anderson/D’Alonzo 1型、无移位的2型和3型齿状突骨折可保守治疗。即使不愈合也不一定导致不良临床结果。在Anderson/D’Alonzo 2型骨折中,手术治疗具有相对安全的骨愈合优势,即使在老年患者中并发症发生率也不会增加,因此可以推荐。然而,对于高龄患者,应逐案决策。当需要对骨质疏松性齿状突骨折进行手术稳定时,后路技术在生物力学上具有优势,可被视为标准方法。