Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e047364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047364.
Responsive behaviours (eg, wandering, resisting care and verbal abuse) are a continuing issue for staff and individuals living in long-term care (LTC) homes. The LTC environment can influence responsive behaviours and is a factor in determining the quality of life for those living there. The ways in which the quality of the environment might influence responsive behaviours has not been investigated yet. We hypothesised that better quality environments would be associated with reduced rates of responsive behaviours. We used a tool that simultaneously encompasses human and structural elements of the environment, a novel approach in this field of research.
Cross-sectional study, using data collected from September 2014 to May 2015 as part of the Translating Research in Elder Care research programme.
A representative, stratified (size, owner-operator model and health region) random sample of 76 LTC homes in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba.
13 224 individuals (67.3% females) living in participating LTC homes.
Quality of care unit work environment was assessed using the observable indicators of quality (OIQ) tool. Responsive behaviours were assessed using routinely collected Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set V.2.0 data.
Adjusted regression coefficients of overall Aggressive Behaviour Scale score and interpersonal communication were 0.02 (95% CI -0.011 to 0.045), grooming 0.06 (95% CI -0.032 to 0.157), environment-basics 0.067 (95% CI 0.024 to 0.110), odour -0.066 (95% CI -0.137 to -0.004), care delivery -0.007 (95% CI -0.033 to 0.019), environment-access -0.027 (95% CI -0.062 to 0.007), environment-homelike -0.034 (95% CI -0.065 to -0.002) and total OIQ score 0.003 (95% CI -0.004 to 0.010).
We found small associations between the environmental quality and responsive behaviours in Western Canadian LTC homes. Higher scores on homelikeness were associated with decreased responsive behaviours. Higher scores on basic environmental quality were associated with increased responsive behaviours.
反应性行为(例如,游荡、抗拒护理和言语虐待)是长期护理(LTC)机构工作人员和居民面临的持续问题。LTC 环境会影响反应性行为,也是决定居民生活质量的一个因素。然而,环境质量如何影响反应性行为还没有得到研究。我们假设更好的环境质量与反应性行为发生率的降低有关。我们使用了一种工具来同时包含环境的人和结构元素,这是该研究领域的一种新方法。
横断面研究,使用 2014 年 9 月至 2015 年 5 月作为 Translating Research in Elder Care 研究计划的一部分收集的数据。
不列颠哥伦比亚省、艾伯塔省和马尼托巴省的一个具有代表性的、分层的(规模、业主-运营商模式和卫生区域)随机选择的 76 个 LTC 住宅。
居住在参与 LTC 住宅的 13224 人(67.3%为女性)。
使用可观察质量指标(OIQ)工具评估护理单元工作环境的质量。使用常规收集的居民评估工具-最小数据集 V.2.0 数据评估反应性行为。
调整后的整体攻击性行为量表评分和人际沟通的回归系数为 0.02(95%CI-0.011 至 0.045),修饰 0.06(95%CI-0.032 至 0.157),环境基本情况 0.067(95%CI0.024 至 0.110),气味-0.066(95%CI-0.137 至-0.004),护理传递-0.007(95%CI-0.033 至 0.019),环境可达性-0.027(95%CI-0.062 至 0.007),环境家庭般-0.034(95%CI-0.065 至-0.002)和总 OIQ 评分 0.003(95%CI-0.004 至 0.010)。
我们发现加拿大西部 LTC 住宅环境质量与反应性行为之间存在小的关联。家庭般的环境质量评分较高与反应性行为减少有关。基本环境质量评分较高与反应性行为增加有关。