• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于恶性高钙血症治疗的价值观和其他决策因素:系统评价方案。

Values and other decisional factors regarding treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Calcium Metabolism and Osteoporosis Program, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e051141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051141.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051141
PMID:34635523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8506874/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypercalcaemia of malignancy (HCM) is the second most common cause of hypercalcaemia and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several treatment options are available including pharmacological therapy with bisphosphonates, denosumab, glucocorticoids and calcimimetics, as well as conventional therapy with hydration and possibly calcitonin. While guidelines have previously considered treatment effects, no guideline has yet considered a range of contextual factors impacting recommendations for the management. The aim of this study was to summarise the available evidence on important decisional factors for the development of guidelines for the treatment of HCM. These include patient's values and preferences, cost, acceptability, feasibility and equity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol is registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021264371). This is a systematic review of observational studies, case series, trials, reviews and qualitative studies involving treatment of adult patients with HCM. We will develop and execute two independent search strategies using five databases: PubMed, Medline (OVID), Embase.com, CINAHL (EBSCO) and Cochrane, and review their combined output. Two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and full texts and will implement data abstraction from relevant studies independently and in duplicate. The outcomes of interest are the decisional factors that influence drug selection, with possible subgroup summaries by drug class or aetiology of HCM. We will present the data collected in a narrative and thematic approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not applicable for our study, since we will only collect data from available literature. This systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal when completed.

摘要

简介

恶性肿瘤相关性高钙血症(HCM)是引起高钙血症的第二大常见原因,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。有多种治疗选择,包括双膦酸盐、地舒单抗、糖皮质激素和钙敏感受体激动剂的药物治疗,以及水化和可能使用降钙素的常规治疗。尽管之前的指南已经考虑了治疗效果,但尚无指南考虑影响 HCM 治疗管理建议的一系列背景因素。本研究旨在总结治疗 HCM 指南制定中重要决策因素的现有证据。这些因素包括患者的价值观和偏好、成本、可接受性、可行性和公平性。

方法和分析

本方案已在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42021264371)中注册。这是一项对涉及成年 HCM 患者治疗的观察性研究、病例系列、试验、综述和定性研究的系统评价。我们将使用五个数据库(PubMed、Medline(OVID)、Embase.com、CINAHL(EBSCO)和 Cochrane)制定并执行两个独立的检索策略,并对其综合输出进行审查。两名审查员将独立且重复筛选标题和摘要以及全文,并从相关研究中实施数据提取。感兴趣的结果是影响药物选择的决策因素,可能按药物类别或 HCM 的病因学进行亚组总结。我们将以叙述性和主题性方法呈现收集到的数据。

伦理和传播

我们的研究不需要伦理批准,因为我们只会从现有文献中收集数据。本系统评价完成后将提交给同行评议的期刊。

相似文献

1
Values and other decisional factors regarding treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy: a systematic review protocol.关于恶性高钙血症治疗的价值观和其他决策因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e051141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051141.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.成人恶性肿瘤高钙血症的治疗:内分泌学会临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):507-528. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac621.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Patient and Physician Decisional Factors Regarding Hypercalcemia of Malignancy Treatment: A Novel Mixed-Methods Study.患者和医生关于恶性高钙血症治疗决策因素:一项新的混合方法研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):563-584. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac630.
6
How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review.腰痛患者的康复如何定义和测量?混合研究系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 10;12(5):e061475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061475.
7
Effect of differentiating exercise guidance based on a patient's level of low back pain in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.基层医疗中基于患者腰痛程度的差异化运动指导效果:一项混合方法系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e019742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019742.
8
Treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in adults.成人恶性肿瘤高钙血症的治疗。
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Sep;23(5):503-507. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0227. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
9
Prevalence of neck pain and its associated factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非洲颈痛的患病率及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 18;13(9):e074219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074219.
10
Management of acute musculoskeletal pain (excluding low back pain): protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.急性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理(不包括腰痛):系统评价和网络荟萃分析随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024441.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing the Trustworthiness of the Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guidelines.提高内分泌学会临床实践指南的可信度。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Jul 14;107(8):2129-2138. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac290.

本文引用的文献

1
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.修订后的 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)显示出较低的评分者间可靠性和应用方面的挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Management of Hypercalcemia in Malignancy: A Review of the Literature.恶性肿瘤高钙血症的诊断、病理生理学和治疗:文献复习。
Horm Metab Res. 2019 Dec;51(12):770-778. doi: 10.1055/a-1049-0647. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
3
Outcomes of hypercalcemia of malignancy in patients with solid cancer: a national inpatient analysis.实体瘤恶性高钙血症患者的结局:一项全国性住院患者分析。
Med Oncol. 2019 Sep 16;36(10):90. doi: 10.1007/s12032-019-1315-8.
4
Myeloma bone disease: from biology findings to treatment approaches.多发性骨髓瘤骨病:从生物学发现到治疗方法。
Blood. 2019 Apr 4;133(14):1534-1539. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-852459. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.病例系列和病例报告的方法学质量与综合分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):60-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 4 部分:如何评估一致性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8.
7
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 6 篇:如何评估数据的相关性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6.
8
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 3 部分:如何评估方法学局限性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0690-9.
9
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估 - 第 5 部分:如何评估数据充分性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0692-7.
10
Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions.评估卫生保健干预措施系统评价中偏倚风险的建议。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 14.