• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择退出框架减弱了实验室和实地竞争决策中的性别差异。

Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field.

机构信息

Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;

Department of Management, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108337118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2108337118
PMID:34635595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8594527/
Abstract

Research shows that women are less likely to enter competitions than men. This disparity may translate into a gender imbalance in holding leadership positions or ascending in organizations. We provide both laboratory and field experimental evidence that this difference can be attenuated with a default nudge-changing the choice to enter a competitive task from a default in which applicants must actively choose to compete to a default in which applicants are automatically enrolled in competition but can choose to opt out. Changing the default affects the perception of prevailing social norms about gender and competition as well as perceptions of the performance or ability threshold at which to apply. We do not find associated negative effects for performance or wellbeing. These results suggest that organizations could make use of opt-out promotion schemes to reduce the gender gap in competition and support the ascension of women to leadership positions.

摘要

研究表明,女性参与竞争的可能性低于男性。这种差距可能会导致领导层或组织内部出现性别失衡的情况。我们提供了实验室和实地实验证据,表明这种差异可以通过默认的推动来缓解——将参与竞争任务的选择从默认的申请人必须主动选择竞争改为默认的申请人自动参加竞争但可以选择退出竞争。改变默认设置会影响对性别和竞争的普遍社会规范的看法,以及对申请的表现或能力门槛的看法。我们没有发现与绩效或幸福感相关的负面影响。这些结果表明,组织可以利用选择退出的晋升计划来减少竞争中的性别差距,支持女性晋升领导层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd0/8594527/442d782360e3/pnas.2108337118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd0/8594527/79261959bd2e/pnas.2108337118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd0/8594527/442d782360e3/pnas.2108337118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd0/8594527/79261959bd2e/pnas.2108337118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd0/8594527/442d782360e3/pnas.2108337118fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field.选择退出框架减弱了实验室和实地竞争决策中的性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108337118.
2
Gender and competitive preferences: The role of competition size.性别与竞争偏好:竞争规模的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1122-33. doi: 10.1037/apl0000112. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Prosocial option increases women's entry into competition.亲社会选项增加了女性参与竞争的机会。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 9;118(45). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111943118.
4
Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial.决策诊断性遗传检测中的框架效应:一项随机试验的结果。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 20;12(6):941. doi: 10.3390/genes12060941.
5
Lessons from the evolution of 401(k) retirement plans for increased consumerism in health care: an application of behavioral research.401(k) 退休计划演变对医疗保健领域增强消费主义的启示:行为研究的应用
EBRI Issue Brief. 2008 Aug(320):1, 3-26.
6
Default sensitivity in attempts at social influence.尝试社交影响时的默认敏感度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):695-702. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01834-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Medical school research ranking is associated with gender inequality in MSTP application rates.医学院校研究排名与 MSTP 申请率中的性别不平等有关。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1306-z.
8
Managerial decision-making in the laboratory.
Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1990 Nov-Dec;4(6):425-31.
9
Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming.通过启动来缩小竞争力方面的性别差距。
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 19;9(1):4359. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06896-6.
10
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.

引用本文的文献

1
Debiasing job ads by replacing masculine language increases gender diversity of applicant pools.通过替换男性化语言来消除招聘广告中的偏见,可以增加求职者群体的性别多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2409854122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409854122. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
A legend in one's own mind: The link between ambition and leadership evaluations.自我心中的传奇:抱负与领导力评价之间的联系。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 20;3(8):pgae295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for Promoting Healthier Food Choices.促进更健康食物选择的策略。
Am Econ Rev. 2009 May;99(2):159-64. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.159.
2
Medicine. Do defaults save lives?医学。默认设置能挽救生命吗?
Science. 2003 Nov 21;302(5649):1338-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1091721.
3
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.自我推销作为女性的一个风险因素:反刻板印象印象管理的成本与收益
去偏研究如何助力减少歧视的努力?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 Feb;29(1):81-105. doi: 10.1177/10888683241244829. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
4
On the robustness of gender differences in economic behavior.论经济行为中性别差异的稳健性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):21549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25141-1.
5
Sex Differences in Competitiveness in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs).大型多人在线角色扮演游戏(MMORPG)中的竞争的性别差异。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;20(2):14747049221109388. doi: 10.1177/14747049221109388.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):629-45. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629.