• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创侧方腰椎椎间融合术中终板损伤的危险因素。

Risk factors for intraoperative endplate injury during minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung-Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung-Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99751-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-99751-6
PMID:34635757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8505407/
Abstract

During lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), unintended intraoperative endplate injury (IEPI) can occur and thereafter lead cage subsidence. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of IEPI during LLIF, and its predisposing factors. A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients (n = 186; mean age, 70.0 ± 7.6 years) who underwent LLIF at 372 levels. Patient's demographic and surgical data were compared between patients with and without IEPI. Also, the radiographic data of each level were compared between intact and IEPI segments. IEPI was identified at 76 levels (20.4%) in 65 patients. The incidences of IEPI at every 100 consecutive segments were not different. When 372 segments were analyzed independently, sagittal disc angle (DA) in the extended position (4.3° ± 3.6° at IEPI segments vs. 6.4° ± 4.0° at intact segments), the difference between sagittal DA in the extended position and cage angle (- 2.2° ± 4.0° vs. 0.0° ± 3.9°), and the difference between preoperative disc height and cage height (- 5.4 mm ± 2.4 mm vs. - 4.7 mm ± 2.0 mm) were different significantly. Also, endplate sclerosis was more common at intact segments than IEPI segments (33.2% vs. 17.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.160; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.036-0.704), endplate sclerosis (OR 3.307; 95% CI 1.450-8.480), and sagittal DA in the extended position (OR 0.674; 95% CI 0.541-0.840) were significant associated factors for IEPI. IEPI was correlated not with surgeon's experience, but with patient factors, such as sex, preoperative disc angle, and endplate sclerosis. Careful surgical procedures should be employed for patients with these predisposing factors.

摘要

在侧方腰椎体间融合术(LLIF)过程中,可能会发生意外的术中终板损伤(IEPI),随后导致椎间融合器下沉。本研究旨在探讨 LLIF 术中 IEPI 的发生率及其易患因素。对连续 186 例(平均年龄 70.0±7.6 岁)在 372 个节段行 LLIF 的患者进行回顾性分析。比较有和无 IEPI 患者的患者人口统计学和手术数据。还比较了完整节段和 IEPI 节段的每个节段的影像学数据。在 65 名患者的 76 个节段中发现 IEPI。在每 100 个连续节段中,IEPI 的发生率没有差异。当独立分析 372 个节段时,伸展位矢状椎间盘角(DA)(IEPI 节段为 4.3°±3.6°,完整节段为 6.4°±4.0°),伸展位矢状 DA 与椎间融合器角度之间的差值(-2.2°±4.0° vs. 0.0°±3.9°),以及术前椎间盘高度与椎间融合器高度之间的差值(-5.4mm±2.4mm vs. -4.7mm±2.0mm)差异有统计学意义。此外,完整节段的终板硬化比 IEPI 节段更常见(33.2% vs. 17.3%)。多因素分析显示,男性(比值比[OR]0.160;95%置信区间[CI]0.036-0.704)、终板硬化(OR 3.307;95%CI 1.450-8.480)和伸展位矢状 DA(OR 0.674;95%CI 0.541-0.840)是 IEPI 的显著相关因素。IEPI 与术者经验无关,而是与患者因素相关,如性别、术前椎间盘角和终板硬化。对于具有这些易患因素的患者,应采用谨慎的手术操作。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for intraoperative endplate injury during minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.微创侧方腰椎椎间融合术中终板损伤的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99751-6.
2
Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.骨质量差、多节段手术、以及狭窄且高的 cage 与侧路腰椎间融合术中终板损伤和迟发性 cage 下沉有关:一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):163-188. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001915.
3
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
4
The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.计算机辅助三维导航在成人脊柱畸形后路内固定联合多节段侧路腰椎间融合术中的可行性。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20353.
5
Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?单纯侧方腰椎间融合术与后路固定的侧方腰椎间融合术治疗单节段、低度、腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Mar;85:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.040. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Comparison of Intraoperative Endplate Injury between Mini-Open Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Analysis of Risk Factors: A Retrospective Study.微创侧方腰椎间融合术(Mini-Open LLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)术中终板损伤的比较及危险因素分析:一项回顾性研究。
J Invest Surg. 2023 Dec;36(1):2285787. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2023.2285787. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology: A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗临床相邻节段病变:与传统后路腰椎椎间融合术的比较研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;32(10):E426-E433. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000787.
8
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者发生 cage 沉降的危险因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 1;45(19):E1279-E1285. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003557.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI based paraspinal muscle mass predicts early cage subsidence after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.基于磁共振成像的椎旁肌质量可预测腰椎后路椎间融合术后早期椎间融合器下沉。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13217-7.
2
3D-Printed Titanium Cages for Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Result in Excellent Fusion Rates One Year After Surgery.用于腰椎前路和侧方椎间融合的3D打印钛笼在术后一年可实现优异的融合率。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 1:21925682251344557. doi: 10.1177/21925682251344557.
3
Bone turnover markers are risk factors for endplate injuries during lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
Adult Spinal Deformity: Current Concepts and Decision-Making Strategies for Management.成人脊柱畸形:当前概念与管理决策策略
Asian Spine J. 2020 Dec;14(6):886-897. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0568. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、要点与陷阱
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):730-741. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0485. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications.微创脊柱手术:技术、科技与适应症
骨转换标志物是腰椎椎间融合术中终板损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 22;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05585-7.
4
Effects of Vacuum Phenomenon on Cage Subsidence and Fusion Outcomes in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cohort Study.真空现象对斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术中椎间融合器下沉及融合结果的影响:一项队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7036. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237036.
5
Coronal vertical fracture of vertebral body following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: risk factor analysis in consecutive case series.微创侧方腰椎椎间融合术后椎体冠状面垂直骨折:连续病例系列的危险因素分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 21;166(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06043-9.
6
Effectiveness of a two-stage posterior-anterior-posterior surgery using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts for adult spinal deformity: a retrospective observational study.使用皮下保存的自体骨移植进行两阶段后-前-后手术治疗成人脊柱畸形的有效性:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 27;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04572-8.
7
A comparative analysis of using cage acrossing the vertebral ring apophysis in normal and osteoporotic models under endplate injury: a finite element analysis.终板损伤下正常及骨质疏松模型中使用跨越椎体环突的椎间融合器的比较分析:有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 8;11:1263751. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1263751. eCollection 2023.
8
Predictors of Vertebral Endplate Fractures after Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.预测斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎体终板骨折的因素。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Oct;15(5):809-817. doi: 10.4055/cios23037. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Biomechanical properties of lumbar vertebral ring apophysis cage under endplate injury: a finite element analysis.腰椎椎弓根关节突 cage 在终板损伤下的生物力学特性:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 30;24(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06792-1.
10
Mini-Open Intercostal Retroperitoneal Approach for Upper Lumbar Spine Lateral Interbody Fusion.微创开放肋间腹膜后入路用于上腰椎侧方椎间融合术
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):553-563. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244960.480. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):694-701. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0384. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Does Lumbar Interbody Cage Size Influence Subsidence? A Biomechanical Study.腰椎椎间融合器大小会影响沉降吗?一项生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):88-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003194.
5
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): biometrical results and own experiences.前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF):生物测量学结果及自身经验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):687-693. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01108-1. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches.微创外侧椎间融合术的并发症:一项比较腰大肌前入路和经腰大肌入路的系统评价与Meta分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 25;30(4):446-460. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800. Print 2019 Apr 1.
7
Evaluation and Prediction of Human Lumbar Vertebrae Endplate Mechanical Properties Using Indentation and Computed Tomography.使用压痕和计算机断层扫描评估和预测人腰椎终板的力学性能
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Oct 1;140(10):1010111-9. doi: 10.1115/1.4040252.
8
Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.斜外侧椎间融合技术的并发症及预防策略
Orthop Surg. 2018 May;10(2):98-106. doi: 10.1111/os.12380.
9
The effect of interbody fusion cage design on the stability of the instrumented spine in response to cyclic loading: an experimental study.椎间融合 cage 设计对脊柱内固定节段在循环加载下稳定性的影响:一项实验研究。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1867-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.钛与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合术:Meta分析及文献综述
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21.