Department of Intensive Care, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):595-606. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005314.
To investigate healthcare system-driven variation in general characteristics, interventions, and outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients admitted to the ICU within one Western European region across three countries.
Multicenter observational cohort study.
Seven ICUs in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, one region across Belgium, The Netherlands, and Germany.
Consecutive COVID-19 patients supported in the ICU during the first pandemic wave.
None.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and outcome data were retrieved after ethical approval and data-sharing agreements. Descriptive statistics were performed to investigate country-related practice variation. From March 2, 2020, to August 12, 2020, 551 patients were admitted. Mean age was 65.4 ± 11.2 years, and 29% were female. At admission, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 15.0 ± 5.5, 16.8 ± 5.5, and 15.8 ± 5.3 (p = 0.002), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 4.4 ± 2.7, 7.4 ± 2.2, and 7.7 ± 3.2 (p < 0.001) in the Belgian, Dutch, and German parts of Euregio, respectively. The ICU mortality rate was 22%, 42%, and 44%, respectively (p < 0.001). Large differences were observed in the frequency of organ support, antimicrobial/inflammatory therapy application, and ICU capacity. Mixed-multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that differences in ICU mortality were independent of age, sex, disease severity, comorbidities, support strategies, therapies, and complications.
COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs within one region, the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, differed significantly in general characteristics, applied interventions, and outcomes despite presumed genetic and socioeconomic background, admission diagnosis, access to international literature, and data collection are similar. Variances in healthcare systems' organization, particularly ICU capacity and admission criteria, combined with a rapidly spreading pandemic might be important drivers for the observed differences. Heterogeneity between patient groups but also healthcare systems should be presumed to interfere with outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019.
调查在一个西欧地区的三个国家内,进入 ICU 的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的医疗体系驱动的一般特征、干预措施和结局变化。
多中心观察性队列研究。
比利时、荷兰和德国三国交界的默兹-莱茵河欧瑞吉地区的 7 个 ICU。
在第一次大流行浪潮期间在 ICU 接受支持的连续 COVID-19 患者。
无。
在获得伦理批准和数据共享协议后,检索了基线人口统计学和临床特征、实验室值和结局数据。进行描述性统计以调查与国家相关的实践差异。从 2020 年 3 月 2 日至 2020 年 8 月 12 日,共收治了 551 名患者。平均年龄为 65.4 ± 11.2 岁,29%为女性。入院时,急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分分别为 15.0 ± 5.5、16.8 ± 5.5 和 15.8 ± 5.3(p = 0.002),序贯器官衰竭评估评分分别为 4.4 ± 2.7、7.4 ± 2.2 和 7.7 ± 3.2(p < 0.001)在比利时、荷兰和德国的欧瑞吉部分。ICU 死亡率分别为 22%、42%和 44%(p < 0.001)。在器官支持、抗菌/抗炎治疗应用和 ICU 能力方面观察到很大差异。混合多变量逻辑回归分析表明,ICU 死亡率的差异独立于年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、合并症、支持策略、治疗和并发症。
尽管假定遗传和社会经济背景、入院诊断、获得国际文献和数据收集相似,但在一个地区(默兹-莱茵河欧瑞吉地区)接受 ICU 治疗的 COVID-19 患者在一般特征、应用干预措施和结局方面存在显著差异。医疗体系组织的差异,特别是 ICU 能力和入院标准,加上迅速蔓延的大流行,可能是观察到的差异的重要驱动因素。患者群体之间以及医疗体系之间的异质性也可能干扰 2019 年冠状病毒病的结局。