• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过更新和扩展提高现有模型的准确性:使用多中心 COVID-19 ICU 队列作为替代。

Boosting the accuracy of existing models by updating and extending: using a multicenter COVID-19 ICU cohort as a proxy.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center + (Maastricht UMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Laurentius Ziekenhuis, Roermond, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70333-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70333-6
PMID:39487145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11530535/
Abstract

Most published prediction models for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were poorly reported, at high risk of bias, and heterogeneous in model performance. To tackle methodological challenges faced in previous prediction studies, we investigated whether model updating and extending improves mortality prediction, using the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as a proxy. All COVID-19 patients admitted to seven ICUs in the Euregio-Meuse Rhine during the first pandemic wave were included. The 4C Mortality and SEIMC scores were selected as promising prognostic models from an external validation study. Five predictors could be estimated based on cohort size. TRIPOD guidelines were followed and logistic regression analyses with the linear predictor, APACHE II score, and country were performed. Bootstrapping with backward selection was applied to select variables for the final model. Additionally, shrinkage was performed. Model discrimination was displayed as optimism-corrected areas under the ROC curve and calibration by calibration slopes and plots. The mortality rate of the 551 included patients was 36%. Discrimination of the 4C Mortality and SEIMC scores increased from 0.70 to 0.74 and 0.70 to 0.73 and calibration plots improved compared to the original models after updating and extending. Mortality prediction can be improved after updating and extending of promising models.

摘要

大多数发表的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)预测模型报告不充分,存在较高的偏倚风险,且模型性能存在异质性。为了解决先前预测研究中面临的方法学挑战,我们研究了模型更新和扩展是否可以改善死亡率预测,以重症监护病房(ICU)作为替代。所有在第一次大流行期间在 Euregio-Meuse Rhine 地区的七个 ICU 住院的 COVID-19 患者均被纳入研究。4C 死亡率和 SEIMC 评分被选为来自外部验证研究的有前途的预后模型。可以根据队列大小估计五个预测因子。遵循 TRIPOD 指南,对线性预测因子、APACHE II 评分和国家进行逻辑回归分析。应用向后选择的自举法选择最终模型的变量。此外,还进行了收缩。通过校正后的 ROC 曲线下面积和校准斜率和图来显示模型的判别能力和校准。551 例纳入患者的死亡率为 36%。与原始模型相比,4C 死亡率和 SEIMC 评分的更新和扩展后,其判别能力从 0.70 提高到 0.74 和 0.70 提高到 0.73,校准图得到改善。对有前途的模型进行更新和扩展后,可以提高死亡率预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/62d9559cd085/41598_2024_70333_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/5a7c477a5baa/41598_2024_70333_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/481e7fabbdc1/41598_2024_70333_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/62d9559cd085/41598_2024_70333_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/5a7c477a5baa/41598_2024_70333_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/481e7fabbdc1/41598_2024_70333_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5277/11530535/62d9559cd085/41598_2024_70333_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Boosting the accuracy of existing models by updating and extending: using a multicenter COVID-19 ICU cohort as a proxy.通过更新和扩展提高现有模型的准确性:使用多中心 COVID-19 ICU 队列作为替代。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70333-6.
2
Predicting COVID-19 prognosis in the ICU remained challenging: external validation in a multinational regional cohort.预测 ICU 中 COVID-19 的预后仍然具有挑战性:一项多国家区域性队列的外部验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;152:257-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Comparison of mortality risk evaluation tools efficacy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.比较 COVID-19 危重症患者死亡率风险评估工具的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):1173. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06866-2.
4
Early Prediction of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: A Multicenter External Validation Study.早期预测重症加强护理病房获得性衰弱:一项多中心外部验证研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):595-605. doi: 10.1177/0885066618771001. Epub 2018 May 1.
5
Differences and Similarities Among COVID-19 Patients Treated in Seven ICUs in Three Countries Within One Region: An Observational Cohort Study.在一个地区的三个国家的七家 ICU 中治疗的 COVID-19 患者之间的差异和相似之处:一项观察性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):595-606. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005314.
6
Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study.四种COVID-19入院时严重程度预测模型外部验证中的区域表现差异:一项观察性多中心队列研究
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0255748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255748. eCollection 2021.
7
External validation of the ISARIC 4C Mortality Score to predict in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 in a Canadian intensive care unit: a single-centre historical cohort study.加拿大重症监护病房 COVID-19 患者院内死亡率预测的 ISARIC 4C 死亡率评分的外部验证:一项单中心历史队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;70(8):1362-1370. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02512-4. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Simplified prognostic model for critically ill patients in resource limited settings in South Asia.南亚资源有限环境下危重症患者简化预后模型。
Crit Care. 2017 Oct 17;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1843-6.
9
External validation of six COVID-19 prognostic models for predicting mortality risk in older populations in a hospital, primary care, and nursing home setting.在医院、初级保健和疗养院环境中,对 6 种用于预测老年人群死亡率风险的 COVID-19 预后模型进行外部验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;168:111270. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111270. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
10
SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19.SOFA 评分预测 COVID-19 患者死亡率的效果不如年龄。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301013. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting COVID-19 prognosis in the ICU remained challenging: external validation in a multinational regional cohort.预测 ICU 中 COVID-19 的预后仍然具有挑战性:一项多国家区域性队列的外部验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;152:257-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Clinical prediction models for mortality in patients with covid-19: external validation and individual participant data meta-analysis.COVID-19 患者死亡率的临床预测模型:外部验证和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 12;378:e069881. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069881.
3
Better COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit survival in females, independent of age, disease severity, comorbidities, and treatment.
女性在新冠肺炎重症监护病房的存活率更高,与年龄、疾病严重程度、合并症及治疗无关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04531-x.
4
Differences and Similarities Among COVID-19 Patients Treated in Seven ICUs in Three Countries Within One Region: An Observational Cohort Study.在一个地区的三个国家的七家 ICU 中治疗的 COVID-19 患者之间的差异和相似之处:一项观察性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):595-606. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005314.
5
External Validation and Recalibration of the CURB-65 and PSI for Predicting 30-Day Mortality and Critical Care Intervention in Multiethnic Patients with COVID-19.对 CURB-65 和 PSI 进行外部验证和重新校准,以预测 COVID-19 多民族患者的 30 天死亡率和重症监护干预。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;111:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
6
External validation and update of prediction models for unfavorable outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan.日本住院 COVID-19 患者不良结局预测模型的外部验证和更新。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul;27(7):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
ICU Bed Utilization During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in a Multistate Analysis-March to June 2020.2020年3月至6月多州分析中2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的重症监护病房床位使用情况
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Mar 12;3(3):e0361. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000361. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Development and validation of a prediction model for 30-day mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: the COVID-19 SEIMC score.开发和验证一种预测模型,用于预测 COVID-19 住院患者 30 天死亡率:COVID-19 SEIMC 评分。
Thorax. 2021 Sep;76(9):920-929. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216001. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb.临床预测模型的外部验证:基于模拟的样本量计算比经验法则更可靠。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
10
Serial measurements in COVID-19-induced acute respiratory disease to unravel heterogeneity of the disease course: design of the Maastricht Intensive Care COVID cohort (MaastrICCht).连续测量 COVID-19 诱导的急性呼吸疾病以阐明疾病过程的异质性:Maastricht 重症监护 COVID 队列(MaastrICCht)的设计。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e040175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040175.