Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Department of Bioengineering and Cardiology, UC Denver Medical Campus, Denver, CO.
Chest. 2022 Apr;161(4):1048-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
Multiparametric risk assessment is used in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) to target therapy. However, this strategy is imperfect because most patients remain at intermediate or high risk after initial treatment, with low risk being the goal. Metrics of right ventricular (RV) adaptation are promising tools that may help refine our therapeutic strategy.
Does RV adaptation predict therapeutic response over time?
We evaluated 52 incident treatment-naive patients with advanced PAH by catheterization and cardiac imaging longitudinally at baseline, follow-up 1 (∼3 months), and follow-up 2 (∼18 months). All patients received goal-directed therapy with parenteral treprostinil and/or combination therapy with treatment escalation if functional class I or II was not achieved. On the basis of their therapeutic response, patients were evaluated at follow-up 1 as nonresponders (died) or as responders, and again at follow-up 2 as super-responders (low risk) or partial responders (high/intermediate risk). Multiparametric risk was based on a simplified European Respiratory Society/European Society of Cardiology guideline score. RV adaptation was evaluated with the single-beat coupling ratio (Ees/Ea) and diastolic function with diastolic elastance (Eed). Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as OR (95% CI).
Nine patients (17%) were nonresponders. PAH-directed therapy improved the European Respiratory Society low-risk score from 1 (2%) at baseline to 23 (55%) at follow-up 2. Ees/Ea at presentation was nonsignificantly higher in responders (0.9 ± 0.4) vs nonresponders (0.6 ± 0.4; P = .09) but could not be used to predict super-responder status at follow-up 2 (OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.28-7.0]; P = .84). Baseline RV ejection fraction and change in Eed were successfully used to predict super-responder status at follow-up 2 (OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.0-1.27]; P = .009 and OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.86-0.96]; P = .04, respectively).
In patients with advanced PAH, RV-pulmonary arterial coupling could not discriminate irreversible RV failure (nonresponders) at presentation but showed a late trend to improvement by follow-up 2. Early change in Eed and baseline RV ejection fraction were the best predictors of therapeutic response.
多参数风险评估用于肺动脉高压(PAH)以靶向治疗。然而,这种策略并不完美,因为大多数患者在初始治疗后仍处于中高危状态,而低危是目标。右心室(RV)适应的指标是有前途的工具,可能有助于完善我们的治疗策略。
RV 适应是否可以预测随时间的治疗反应?
我们通过导管插入术和心脏成像对 52 例初治的晚期 PAH 患者进行了前瞻性纵向评估,基线、随访 1(约 3 个月)和随访 2(约 18 个月)。所有患者均接受了以肠外曲前列素为基础的靶向治疗,如果功能分类 I 或 II 未达到,则进行联合治疗和治疗升级。根据治疗反应,患者在随访 1 时被评估为无反应者(死亡)或有反应者,并在随访 2 时再次被评估为超级反应者(低危)或部分反应者(中高危)。多参数风险基于简化的欧洲呼吸学会/欧洲心脏病学会指南评分。RV 适应通过单次心跳耦联比(Ees/Ea)进行评估,舒张功能通过舒张弹性(Eed)进行评估。数据以平均值±标准差或比值比(95%置信区间)表示。
9 例(17%)患者为无反应者。PAH 靶向治疗将欧洲呼吸学会低危评分从基线时的 1 分(2%)提高到随访 2 时的 23 分(55%)。有反应者的 Ees/Ea 在就诊时略高于无反应者(0.9±0.4 对 0.6±0.4;P=0.09),但不能用于预测随访 2 时的超级反应者状态(比值比,1.40[95%置信区间,0.28-7.0];P=0.84)。基线 RV 射血分数和 Eed 的变化成功地预测了随访 2 时的超级反应者状态(比值比,1.15[95%置信区间,1.0-1.27];P=0.009 和比值比,0.29[95%置信区间,0.86-0.96];P=0.04)。
在晚期 PAH 患者中,RV-肺动脉偶联不能在就诊时区分不可逆转的 RV 衰竭(无反应者),但在随访 2 时显示出改善的趋势。Eed 和基线 RV 射血分数的早期变化是治疗反应的最佳预测指标。