• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工关节周围股骨骨折后的死亡率、危险因素及风险评估——一项回顾性队列研究

Mortality, Risk Factors and Risk Assessment after Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

El Khassawna Thaqif, Knapp Gero, Scheibler Nadja, Malhan Deeksha, Walter Nike, Biehl Christoph, Alt Volker, Heiss Christian, Rupp Markus

机构信息

Experimental Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, 35390 Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 23;10(19):4324. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194324.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10194324
PMID:34640342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8509711/
Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a devastating complication. Here, the authors aimed to determine the influence of the timing of surgery as a risk factor for mortality and poor postoperative outcome in patients suffering from PFF. A retrospective descriptive analysis of patients treated for PFF between January 2010 and March 2018 was performed. In addition to patient and treatment characteristics, we assessed mortality rates and postoperative functional outcome by using the Harris Hip and WOMAC score. One-year mortality after PFF was 10.7%. Delayed surgery after 48 h did not negatively influence mortality after PFF. The postoperative hospital stay did not influence the mortality rate, nor did it correlate with medical scores of comorbidities, general health or functionalities. Cementation of stem correlated negatively with the WOMAC score. Deceased patients had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, while American society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scores did not show a significant difference. There were no differences between ORIF and revision arthroplasty. In conclusion, delayed surgery after 48 h does not negatively influence mortality after PFF. The CCI seems to be a suitable tool to assess patients' risk for increased mortality after PFF, while the usually used ASA score is not able to achieve a relevant risk assessment.

摘要

人工关节周围股骨骨折(PFF)是一种严重的并发症。在此,作者旨在确定手术时机作为PFF患者死亡率和术后不良结局的危险因素所产生的影响。对2010年1月至2018年3月期间接受PFF治疗的患者进行了回顾性描述性分析。除了患者和治疗特征外,我们还使用Harris髋关节评分和WOMAC评分评估了死亡率和术后功能结局。PFF后1年死亡率为10.7%。48小时后延迟手术对PFF后的死亡率没有负面影响。术后住院时间对死亡率没有影响,也与合并症、总体健康状况或功能的医学评分无关。柄的骨水泥固定与WOMAC评分呈负相关。死亡患者的Charlson合并症指数(CCI)得分较高,而美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分没有显著差异。切开复位内固定术(ORIF)和翻修关节成形术之间没有差异。总之,48小时后延迟手术对PFF后的死亡率没有负面影响。CCI似乎是评估PFF后患者死亡率增加风险的合适工具,而通常使用的ASA评分无法进行相关的风险评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/6c8cdbfed615/jcm-10-04324-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/cf14b0f964c7/jcm-10-04324-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/ff3b381d9076/jcm-10-04324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/08598ef3f950/jcm-10-04324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/4cf6fd8ce035/jcm-10-04324-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/6c8cdbfed615/jcm-10-04324-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/cf14b0f964c7/jcm-10-04324-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/ff3b381d9076/jcm-10-04324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/08598ef3f950/jcm-10-04324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/4cf6fd8ce035/jcm-10-04324-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/009e/8509711/6c8cdbfed615/jcm-10-04324-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mortality, Risk Factors and Risk Assessment after Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-A Retrospective Cohort Study.人工关节周围股骨骨折后的死亡率、危险因素及风险评估——一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 23;10(19):4324. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194324.
2
Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment.全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折:一种治疗方案。
Injury. 2019 Jul;50 Suppl 2:S45-S51. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.044. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
3
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Risk: Influenced by Stem Choice, Not Surgical Approach.人工关节周围股骨骨折风险:受柄选择影响,与手术入路无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S363-S366. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures and Their Surgical Outcomes Between 2011 and 2021: A Single-Centre Observational Study.2011年至2021年间人工关节周围股骨骨折及其手术结果:一项单中心观察性研究
Cureus. 2022 Aug 24;14(8):e28341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28341. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
High mortality following revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture.翻修髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折死亡率高。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1670-1674. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0367.R1.
6
Treatment and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures.温哥华 B 型假体周围股骨骨折的治疗和结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):293-300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0935.R1.
7
Early Postoperative Outcomes of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Patients Over 90 Years of Age.90岁以上患者人工关节周围股骨骨折的早期术后结果
Cureus. 2024 Mar 28;16(3):e57145. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57145. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?人工关节周围股骨骨折及如何避免:股骨假体部件设计对人工关节周围股骨骨折风险增加有何影响?
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1.
9
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?股骨远端假体周围骨折:切开复位内固定与股骨远端置换术哪个更优?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Frequency and associated factor of atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术后非典型假体周围股骨骨折的发生率及相关因素
Injury. 2018 Dec;49(12):2264-2268. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Managed by Revision Arthroplasty.采用翻修关节成形术治疗的人工关节周围股骨骨折
Cureus. 2025 Jul 2;17(7):e87204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87204. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures are older adults who are commonly diagnosed with osteoporosis.人工关节周围股骨骨折患者多为老年人,常被诊断为骨质疏松症。
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07486-1.
3
Risk factors for mortality in periprosthetic femur fractures about the hip-a retrospective analysis.髋关节周围人工股骨骨折患者死亡的危险因素——一项回顾性分析

本文引用的文献

1
Early Surgery Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Results from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society.早期手术并不能改善假体周围股骨骨折患者的预后——德国创伤学会老年创伤登记处的研究结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 21;57(6):517. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060517.
2
Charlson comorbidity index is predictive of postoperative clinical outcome after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.Charlson 共病指数可预测单节段后路腰椎间融合术后的术后临床结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 30;16(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02377-7.
3
High Failure Rates of Locking Compression Plate Osteosynthesis with Transverse Fracture around a Well-Fixed Stem Tip for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture.
Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):211-217. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06346-7. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Is a guideline required to predict the intensive care unit need of patients over 65 years of age during the pre-operative period? A comparison of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, lung ultrasound score, Charlson age-added comorbidity index, surgi.是否需要指南来预测 65 岁以上患者在术前期间的重症监护病房需求?美国麻醉师协会、肺部超声评分、Charlson 年龄附加合并症指数和手术的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Sep;29(9):1004-1012. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.43082.
5
Osteocytes Influence on Bone Matrix Integrity Affects Biomechanical Competence at Bone-Implant Interface of Bioactive-Coated Titanium Implants in Rat Tibiae.成骨细胞对骨基质完整性的影响会影响生物活性涂层钛植入物在大鼠胫骨骨-植入物界面的生物力学性能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 29;23(1):374. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010374.
人工关节周围股骨骨折中,围绕牢固固定的柄部尖端的横向骨折采用锁定加压钢板接骨术的失败率较高。
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 22;9(11):3758. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113758.
4
Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review.Vancouver 分型 B2 和 B3 型假体周围股骨骨折内固定与翻修关节成形术的比较:一项系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1381-1394. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03332-7. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年髋部骨折患者手术时机的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 17;8(1):13933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32098-7.
6
One year after proximal or distal periprosthetic fracture of the femur -two conditions with divergent outcomes?股骨假体周围近端或远端骨折一年后——两种情况预后不同?
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1176-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Correlation of ASA Grade and the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Complications in Patients After Transurethral Resection of Prostate.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级及查尔森合并症指数与经尿道前列腺切除术后患者并发症的相关性
Urology. 2016 Dec;98:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Optimal Perioperative Management of the Geriatric Patient: A Best Practices Guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society.老年患者围手术期的优化管理:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)和美国老年医学会的最佳实践指南
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):930-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
9
The effect of delay to surgery on morbidity, mortality and length of stay following periprosthetic fracture around the hip.髋关节周围假体周围骨折后手术延迟对发病率、死亡率和住院时间的影响。
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):725-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
10
The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset.英格兰和威尔士翻修全膝关节和髋关节置换术的流行病学:与美国预测的比较分析。一项使用国家关节注册数据集的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35170.