Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;21(19):6413. doi: 10.3390/s21196413.
The Apple Watch is one of the most popular wearable devices designed to monitor physical activity (PA). However, it is currently unknown whether the Apple Watch accurately estimates children's free-living PA. Therefore, this study assessed the concurrent validity of the Apple Watch 3 in estimating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) time and active energy expenditure (AEE) for school-aged children under a simulated and a free-living condition. Twenty elementary school students (Girls: 45%, age: 9.7 ± 2.0 years) wore an Apple Watch 3 device on their wrist and performed prescribed free-living activities in a lab setting. A subgroup of participants (N = 5) wore the Apple Watch for seven consecutive days in order to assess the validity in free-living condition. The K5 indirect calorimetry (K5) and GT3X+ were used as the criterion measure under simulated free-living and free-living conditions, respectively. Mean absolute percent errors (MAPE) and Bland-Altman (BA) plots were conducted to assess the validity of the Apple Watch 3 compared to those from the criterion measures. Equivalence testing determined the statistical equivalence between the Apple Watch and K5 for MVPA time and AEE. The Apple Watch provided comparable estimates for MVPA time (mean bias: 0.3 min, = 0.91, MAPE: 1%) and for AEE (mean bias: 3.8 kcal min, = 0.75, MAPE: 4%) during the simulated free-living condition. The BA plots indicated no systematic bias for the agreement in MVPA and AEE estimates between the K5 and Apple Watch 3. However, the Apple Watch had a relatively large variability in estimating AEE in children. The Apple Watch was statistically equivalent to the K5 within ±17.7% and ±20.8% for MVPA time and AEE estimates, respectively. Our findings suggest that the Apple Watch 3 has the potential to be used as a PA assessment tool to estimate MVPA in school-aged children.
Apple Watch 是最受欢迎的可穿戴设备之一,旨在监测身体活动 (PA)。然而,目前尚不清楚 Apple Watch 是否能准确估计儿童的自由生活 PA。因此,本研究评估了 Apple Watch 3 在模拟和自由生活条件下估计学龄儿童中等到剧烈身体活动 (MVPA) 时间和活跃能量消耗 (AEE) 的同时效度。20 名小学生(女生:45%,年龄:9.7±2.0 岁)将 Apple Watch 3 设备戴在手腕上,并在实验室环境中进行规定的自由生活活动。一小部分参与者(N=5)连续七天佩戴 Apple Watch,以评估自由生活条件下的有效性。K5 间接测热法 (K5) 和 GT3X+分别作为模拟自由生活和自由生活条件下的标准测量方法。进行平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 和 Bland-Altman (BA) 图以评估 Apple Watch 3 与标准测量方法相比的有效性。等效性测试确定了 Apple Watch 和 K5 之间在 MVPA 时间和 AEE 方面的统计学等效性。在模拟自由生活条件下,Apple Watch 为 MVPA 时间(平均偏差:0.3 分钟, = 0.91,MAPE:1%)和 AEE(平均偏差:3.8 千卡/分钟, = 0.75,MAPE:4%)提供了可比的估计值。BA 图表明,在 K5 和 Apple Watch 3 之间的 MVPA 和 AEE 估计值的一致性方面没有系统偏差。然而,Apple Watch 在估计儿童的 AEE 方面具有相对较大的变异性。Apple Watch 在 MVPA 时间和 AEE 估计值方面与 K5 分别在 ±17.7%和 ±20.8%的范围内具有统计学等效性。我们的研究结果表明,Apple Watch 3 有可能成为评估儿童 MVPA 的 PA 评估工具。