Suppr超能文献

左西孟旦对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克死亡率的影响:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。

Effect of levosimendan on mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

作者信息

Chang Wei, Xie Jian-Feng, Xu Jing-Yuan, Yang Yi

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e019338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019338.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aim to synthesise up-to-date randomised trials to investigate the effects of levosimendan on mortality and clinical outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

A collection of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register and Web of Science were searched updated to August 2017. Randomised trials were included when they pertain to the use of levosimendan in severe sepsis or septic shock compared with any category of inotropes, or as an adjunct to standard therapy with mortality reported. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical performances including serum lactate, cardiac function, vasopressor requirement and fluid infusion.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies with 1036 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that levosimendan could not reduce mortality significantly in severe sepsis and septic shock (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.16, P=0.39). Levosimendan use could reduce serum lactate more effectively, and enhance cardiac contractibility with increased cardiac index and left ventricular ejection fraction. However, its use could also increase fluid infusion but not reduce norepinephrine dose. No significant benefit in mortality could be observed of levosimendan versus dobutamine use, or in patients with proven cardiac dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is not sufficient to support levosimendan as superior to dobutamine or as an optimal adjunct in severe sepsis and septic shock. More large-scale randomised trials are necessary to validate levosimendan use in sepsis.

摘要

目的

我们旨在综合最新的随机试验,以研究左西孟旦对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率及临床结局的影响。

方法

检索了包括PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane中心对照试验注册库和科学网在内的数据库,检索截至2017年8月的最新数据。纳入的随机试验需涉及左西孟旦在严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克中的使用,并与任何类型的血管活性药物进行比较,或作为标准治疗的辅助手段且报告了死亡率。主要结局为死亡率,次要结局为临床指标,包括血清乳酸、心功能、血管活性药物需求及液体输注量。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入10项研究,涉及1036例患者。结果显示,左西孟旦不能显著降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率(比值比0.89,95%置信区间0.69至1.16,P = 0.39)。使用左西孟旦能更有效地降低血清乳酸水平,增强心脏收缩力,增加心脏指数和左心室射血分数。然而,其使用也会增加液体输注量,但不会减少去甲肾上腺素剂量。与使用多巴酚丁胺相比,或在已证实存在心功能不全的患者中,未观察到左西孟旦在死亡率方面有显著益处。

结论

目前的证据不足以支持左西孟旦优于多巴酚丁胺,或在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中作为最佳辅助药物。需要更多大规模随机试验来验证左西孟旦在脓毒症中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/401d/5884355/49da287c6e0b/bmjopen-2017-019338f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验