Raatz Larissa, Pirhofer Walzl Karin, Müller Marina E H, Scherber Christoph, Joshi Jasmin
Institute of Biochemistry and Biology Universität Potsdam Universität Potsdam Potsdam Germany.
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e.V Müncheberg Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 24;11(19):13232-13246. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8046. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Semi-natural habitats (SNHs) are becoming increasingly scarce in modern agricultural landscapes. This may reduce natural ecosystem services such as pest control with its putatively positive effect on crop production. In agreement with other studies, we recently reported wheat yield reductions at field borders which were linked to the type of SNH and the distance to the border. In this experimental landscape-wide study, we asked whether these yield losses have a biotic origin while analyzing fungal seed and fungal leaf pathogens, herbivory of cereal leaf beetles, and weed cover as hypothesized mediators between SNHs and yield. We established experimental winter wheat plots of a single variety within conventionally managed wheat fields at fixed distances either to a hedgerow or to an in-field kettle hole. For each plot, we recorded the fungal infection rate on seeds, fungal infection and herbivory rates on leaves, and weed cover. Using several generalized linear mixed-effects models as well as a structural equation model, we tested the effects of SNHs at a field scale (SNH type and distance to SNH) and at a landscape scale (percentage and diversity of SNHs within a 1000-m radius). In the dry year of 2016, we detected one putative biotic culprit: Weed cover was negatively associated with yield values at a 1-m and 5-m distance from the field border with a SNH. None of the fungal and insect pests, however, significantly affected yield, neither solely nor depending on type of or distance to a SNH. However, the pest groups themselves responded differently to SNH at the field scale and at the landscape scale. Our findings highlight that crop losses at field borders may be caused by biotic culprits; however, their negative impact seems weak and is putatively reduced by conventional farming practices.
在现代农业景观中,半自然栖息地(SNHs)正变得越来越稀少。这可能会减少自然生态系统服务,如害虫控制,而害虫控制被认为对作物生产有积极影响。与其他研究一致,我们最近报告了田间边界处小麦产量的下降,这与SNH的类型和到边界的距离有关。在这项全景观的实验研究中,我们在分析真菌种子和真菌叶病原体、谷物叶甲虫的食草作用以及杂草覆盖(作为SNHs和产量之间假定的中介因素)时,探讨了这些产量损失是否有生物起源。我们在传统管理的麦田内,以固定距离设置了单一品种的实验冬小麦地块,这些地块要么靠近树篱,要么靠近田间的壶穴。对于每个地块,我们记录了种子上的真菌感染率、叶片上的真菌感染和食草率以及杂草覆盖情况。我们使用了几个广义线性混合效应模型以及一个结构方程模型,测试了田间尺度(SNH类型和到SNH的距离)和景观尺度(1000米半径内SNHs的百分比和多样性)下SNHs的影响。在2016年的干旱年份,我们发现了一个可能的生物罪魁祸首:在距离有SNH的田边1米和5米处,杂草覆盖与产量值呈负相关。然而,无论是单独来看还是根据SNH的类型或距离来看,真菌和害虫都没有对产量产生显著影响。然而,这些害虫群体本身在田间尺度和景观尺度上对SNH的反应有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,田间边界处的作物损失可能是由生物罪魁祸首造成的;然而,它们的负面影响似乎很微弱,并且可能会被传统耕作方式所减轻。