Hall Andrew, Sage Rufus A, Madden Joah R
Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology University of Exeter Exeter UK.
The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fordingbridge UK.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 14;11(19):13559-13569. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8083. eCollection 2021 Oct.
The release of gamebirds for recreational shooting exerts a series of effects on the ecosystems into which they are placed. Pheasants () are omnivorous and eat invertebrates, especially when young or, if females, when breeding. Consequently, the release of large numbers of pheasants into woodland release pens may affect local invertebrate populations. Previous studies have reported mixed evidence. We conducted pitfall trapping at 13 sites (49 pens) in central England over 2 years (totaling 65 pen measures), comprising three surveys annually, immediately prior to releases in mid-summer, 4 weeks later when most birds were still in the pens, and another 5 weeks later when most birds had dispersed. We compared traps inside and 25 m outside pens in the same wood. We considered release densities and whether the birds had prior experience of eating invertebrates. While accounting for overall seasonal declines in invertebrates trapped, we detected changes for total invertebrate biomass and total counts indicative of released pheasants causing local decreases inside pens, either directly by predation or indirectly by modifying vegetation. There were also relative decreases outside pens when the pheasants start to disperse, suggesting that the released pheasants may be affecting invertebrates in those nearby areas or that their earlier effects inside the pen, modifying vegetation or increasing invertebrate activity, increased the relative susceptibility of invertebrates there to trapping. However, these effects were not seen for specific invertebrate groups believed to be especially susceptible to pheasants. For slugs and detritivores, we detected small population increases inside pens. Across the study period, decreases for most measures were greater outside pens than inside them. We conclude that any effects pheasants have on invertebrate communities at release sites in woodlands are complex and that long-term and taxon-specific studies should be considered to understand the local net ecological effects of gamebird releases on invertebrates.
为休闲射击活动而放生猎禽会对它们被放生进入的生态系统产生一系列影响。雉鸡是杂食性动物,会捕食无脊椎动物,尤其是在幼雏时期,或者对于雌雉鸡来说,在繁殖期会捕食无脊椎动物。因此,将大量雉鸡放生到林地放养鸡舍中可能会影响当地的无脊椎动物种群。此前的研究报告结果不一。我们在英格兰中部的13个地点(49个鸡舍)进行了为期两年的陷阱诱捕(总计65次鸡舍测量),每年进行三次调查,分别在仲夏放生之前、放生4周后(此时大多数鸟类仍在鸡舍中)以及再过5周后(此时大多数鸟类已经散开)。我们比较了同一树林中鸡舍内和鸡舍外25米处的陷阱。我们考虑了放生密度以及鸟类是否有捕食无脊椎动物的先前经验。在考虑到诱捕到的无脊椎动物总体季节性减少的情况下,我们检测到总无脊椎动物生物量和总数的变化,这表明放生的雉鸡直接通过捕食或间接通过改变植被导致鸡舍内数量减少。当雉鸡开始散开时,鸡舍外也有相对减少的情况,这表明放生的雉鸡可能正在影响附近地区的无脊椎动物,或者它们早期在鸡舍内的影响,改变植被或增加无脊椎动物活动,增加了那里的无脊椎动物被诱捕的相对易感性。然而,对于被认为特别容易受到雉鸡影响的特定无脊椎动物群体,并未观察到这些影响。对于蛞蝓和腐食性动物,我们检测到鸡舍内数量略有增加。在整个研究期间,大多数测量指标在鸡舍外的减少幅度大于鸡舍内。我们得出结论,雉鸡对林地放生地点的无脊椎动物群落的任何影响都是复杂的,应该考虑进行长期和特定分类群的研究,以了解猎禽放生对无脊椎动物的当地净生态影响。