• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创左心室辅助装置植入对心脏移植结局的影响。

Impact of Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Heart Transplant Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Vienna, Austria; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Spring;34(1):148-156. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.001
PMID:33609672
Abstract

Left ventricular assist device implantation without sternotomy (LIS) may simplify heart transplantation (HTX) by avoiding adhesions and eliminating the need for a re-sternotomy. This study investigates the impact of LIS LVAD implantation on HTX outcomes. A retrospective comparison of 46 patients undergoing HTX between 07/13 and 06/19 after conventional LVAD implantation with a full sternotomy (FS) and LIS LVAD implantation (LIS: n = 27 patients, 59%; FS: n = 19 patients, 41%) was performed. Endpoints were perioperative data including blood product use, de-novo formation of donor specific antibodies (DSAs) and survival. Patient demographics (mean age FS: 60.3 ± 9.3 years vs LIS 58.0 ± 7.7 years, P = 0.313; male gender FS: 84% vs LIS: 82%, P = 1.000; urgent HTX FS: 16% vs LIS 18%, P = 1.000) were comparable between LIS and FS patients. The primary finding was a significantly higher risk to develop de novo donor specific antibodies (DSAs) after HTX in patients of the FS group (FS: 36% vs LIS: 4%; P = 0.006). LIS patients had a significant reduction of intraoperative packed red blood cells (PRBCs) use (LIS: 4 (IQR 2-7) Units vs FS: 7 (IQR 4-8) Units; P = 0.045). Other adverse events rates and in-hospital mortality (LIS: 7% vs FS 5%, P = 1.000) were comparable between both groups. LIS LVAD reduces formation of donor specific antibodies after HTX.

摘要

经左侧胸廓入路(LIS)植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)可避免粘连,并避免再次开胸,从而简化心脏移植(HTX)。本研究旨在探讨 LIS 行 LVAD 植入对 HTX 结局的影响。对 2013 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月间行 HTX 的 46 例患者进行回顾性比较,其中常规 LVAD 植入+完全胸骨切开术(FS)组(n=19,41%)和 LIS 组(n=27,59%)。主要观察终点为围手术期数据,包括血制品使用、供体特异性抗体(DSA)的新发形成和生存率。LIS 和 FS 患者的患者人口统计学特征(FS 组平均年龄 60.3±9.3 岁,LIS 组 58.0±7.7 岁,P=0.313;男性 FS 组 84%,LIS 组 82%,P=1.000;FS 组急诊 HTX 16%,LIS 组 18%,P=1.000)具有可比性。主要发现是 FS 组 HTX 后新发 DSA 的风险显著增加(FS 组 36%,LIS 组 4%,P=0.006)。LIS 组术中使用的浓缩红细胞(PRBC)显著减少(LIS 组 4(IQR 2-7)单位,FS 组 7(IQR 4-8)单位;P=0.045)。两组间其他不良事件发生率和院内死亡率(LIS 组 7%,FS 组 5%,P=1.000)相似。LIS LVAD 可减少 HTX 后供体特异性抗体的形成。

相似文献

1
Impact of Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Heart Transplant Outcomes.微创左心室辅助装置植入对心脏移植结局的影响。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Spring;34(1):148-156. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Safe and Reduces Intraoperative Blood Product Use: A Propensity Score Analysis VAD Implantation Techniques and Blood Product Use.微创左心室辅助装置植入术安全且减少术中血液制品使用:倾向性评分分析左心室辅助装置植入技术和血液制品使用。
ASAIO J. 2021 Jan 1;67(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001165.
3
Study results suggest less invasive HeartMate 3 implantation is a safe and effective approach for obese patients.研究结果表明,对肥胖患者而言,采用侵袭性更小的 HeartMate 3 植入术是一种安全且有效的方法。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Sep;40(9):990-997. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Destination Therapy: Is Less Invasive Surgery a Safe Alternative?用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置疗法:微创手术是一种安全的替代方案吗?
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan;71(1):13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Less invasive surgical implant strategy and right heart failure after LVAD implantation.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后微创外科植入策略与右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Apr;40(4):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Impact of surgical approach for left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative invasive hemodynamics and right ventricular failure.手术入路对左心室辅助装置植入术后有创血流动力学和右心衰竭的影响。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3072-3081. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16766. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
8
Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后心脏移植的长期预后。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy214.
9
Which advanced heart failure therapy strategy is optimal for patients over 60 years old?哪种晚期心力衰竭治疗策略对60岁以上的患者最为合适?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Apr;60(2):251-258. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10593-3. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Left thoracotomy vs full sternotomy for centrifugal durable LVAD implantation: 1-year outcome comparison post-LVAD and post-heart transplantation.左侧开胸术与全胸骨切开术在离心式耐用型左心室辅助装置植入中的比较:LVAD 后和心脏移植后的 1 年结果比较。
J Artif Organs. 2021 Sep;24(3):312-319. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01250-y. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Developments in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.心室辅助装置治疗的最新进展
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 14;26(1):25440. doi: 10.31083/RCM25440. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Innovations in implantation techniques of ventricular assist devices.心室辅助装置植入技术的创新。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Oct 16;8:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.047. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.移植前左心室辅助装置支持时间对心脏移植后结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):462-469. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab265.