Department of Clinical Physiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Physiology, Department of Research and Development, Växjö Central Hospital, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 13;28(12):1360-1369. doi: 10.1177/2047487320909667. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Guidelines recommend considering workload in interpretation of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to exercise, but reference values are lacking.
This was a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.
From 12,976 subjects aged 18-85 years who performed a bicycle ergometer exercise test at one centre in Sweden during the years 2005-2016, we excluded those with prevalent cardiovascular disease, comorbidities, cardiac risk factors or medications. We extracted SBP, heart rate and workload (watt) from ≥ 3 time points from each test. The SBP/watt-slope and the SBP/watt-ratio at peak exercise were calculated. Age- and sex-specific mean values, standard deviations and 90th and 95th percentiles were determined. Reference equations for workload-indexed and peak SBP were derived using multiple linear regression analysis, including sex, age, workload, SBP at rest and anthropometric variables as predictors.
A final sample of 3839 healthy subjects (n = 1620 female) were included. While females had lower mean peak SBP than males (188 ± 24 vs 202 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001), workload-indexed SBP measures were markedly higher in females; SBP/watt-slope: 0.52 ± 0.21 versus 0.41 ± 0.15 mmHg/watt (p < 0.001); peak SBP/watt-ratio: 1.35 ± 0.34 versus 0.90 ± 0.21 mmHg/watt (p < 0.001). Age, sex, exercise capacity, resting SBP and height were significant predictors of the workload-indexed SBP parameters and were included in the reference equations.
These novel reference values can aid clinicians and exercise physiologists in interpreting the SBP response to exercise and may provide a basis for future research on the prognostic impact of exercise SBP. In females, a markedly higher SBP in relation to workload could imply a greater peripheral vascular resistance during exercise than in males.
指南建议在解释运动时的收缩压(SBP)反应时考虑工作量,但缺乏参考值。
这是一项回顾性、连续队列研究。
我们从 2005 年至 2016 年在瑞典一家中心进行自行车测力计运动试验的 12976 名年龄在 18-85 岁的受试者中排除了有心血管疾病、合并症、心脏危险因素或药物的患者。我们从每个试验中提取了≥3 个时间点的 SBP、心率和工作量(瓦特)。计算 SBP/瓦特斜率和最大运动时的 SBP/瓦特比。确定年龄和性别特异性平均值、标准差以及 90%和 95%的百分位数。使用多元线性回归分析,包括性别、年龄、工作量、静息 SBP 和人体测量学变量作为预测因素,推导出工作量指数和最大 SBP 的参考方程。
最终纳入 3839 名健康受试者(n=1620 名女性)。虽然女性的最大 SBP 平均值低于男性(188±24 与 202±22 mmHg,p<0.001),但女性的工作量指数 SBP 明显更高;SBP/瓦特斜率:0.52±0.21 与 0.41±0.15 mmHg/瓦特(p<0.001);最大 SBP/瓦特比:1.35±0.34 与 0.90±0.21 mmHg/瓦特(p<0.001)。年龄、性别、运动能力、静息 SBP 和身高是工作量指数 SBP 指标的显著预测因素,并包含在参考方程中。
这些新的参考值可以帮助临床医生和运动生理学家解释运动时的 SBP 反应,并为未来关于运动 SBP 的预后影响的研究提供基础。在女性中,与工作量相比,SBP 明显升高可能意味着女性在运动期间外周血管阻力比男性更大。