• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业室内运动员在最大运动测试中基于工作量指数的血压反应。

Workload-indexed blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes.

作者信息

Bauer Pascal, Kraushaar Lutz, Dörr Oliver, Nef Holger, Hamm Christian W, Most Astrid

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Giessen, Germany.

Adiphea GmbH, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 25;28(13):1487-1494. doi: 10.1177/2047487320922043.

DOI:10.1177/2047487320922043
PMID:33611510
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exercise testing is performed regularly in professional athletes. However, the blood pressure response (BPR) to exercise is rarely investigated in this cohort, and normative upper thresholds are lacking. Recently, a workload-indexed BPR (increase in systolic blood pressure per increase in metabolic equivalent of task (SBP/MET slope)) was evaluated in a general population and was compared with mortality. We sought to evaluate the SBP/MET slope in professional athletes and compare it with performance.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A total of 142 male professional indoor athletes (age 26 ± 5 years) were examined. Blood pressure was measured at rest and during a standardized, graded cycle ergometer test. We assessed the BPR during exercise, the workload, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET). Athletes were divided into groups according to their SBP/MET slope quartiles (I <4.3; II 4.3-6.2; III >6.2-9; IV >9 mmHg/MET) and compared regarding systolic BP (sBP) and workload achieved.

RESULTS

Athletes in group I (n = 42) had the lowest maximum sBP (180 ± 13 mmHg) but achieved the highest relative workload (4.2 ± 1 W/kg). With increasing SBP/MET slope, the maximum sBP increased (II (n = 56): 195 ± 15 mmHg; III (n = 44): 216 ± 16 mmHg) and the workload achieved decreased (II: 3.9 ± 0.7 W/kg; III: 3.3 ± 0.5 W/kg). The differences in sBP between these groups were significant (p < 0.001). None of the athletes were assigned to group IV (>9 mmHg/MET).

CONCLUSION

Athletes in the lowest SBP/MET slope quartile displayed the lowest maximum sBP but achieved a higher workload than athletes classified into the other SBP/MET slope groups. This simple, novel metric might help to distinguish a normal from an exaggerated BPR to exercise, to identify athletes at risk of developing hypertension.

摘要

背景

运动测试在职业运动员中定期进行。然而,该队列中运动时的血压反应(BPR)很少被研究,且缺乏正常上限阈值。最近,在普通人群中评估了工作量指数化的BPR(每增加一个代谢当量任务时收缩压的增加量(SBP/MET斜率)),并与死亡率进行了比较。我们试图评估职业运动员的SBP/MET斜率,并将其与运动表现进行比较。

设计

这是一项横断面研究。

方法

共检查了142名男性职业室内运动员(年龄26±5岁)。在静息状态和标准化分级蹬车试验期间测量血压。我们评估了运动期间的BPR、工作量和代谢当量任务(MET)。运动员根据其SBP/MET斜率四分位数分组(I组<4.3;II组4.3 - 6.2;III组>6.2 - 9;IV组>9 mmHg/MET),并比较了收缩压(sBP)和达到的工作量。

结果

I组(n = 42)的运动员最大sBP最低(180±13 mmHg),但达到的相对工作量最高(4.2±1 W/kg)。随着SBP/MET斜率增加,最大sBP升高(II组(n = 56):195±15 mmHg;III组(n = 44):216±16 mmHg),达到的工作量降低(II组:3.9±0.7 W/kg;III组:3.3±0.5 W/kg)。这些组之间的sBP差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。没有运动员被分配到IV组(>9 mmHg/MET)。

结论

SBP/MET斜率四分位数最低的运动员最大sBP最低,但比其他SBP/MET斜率组的运动员达到更高的工作量。这个简单的新指标可能有助于区分正常与过度的运动BPR,识别有患高血压风险的运动员。

相似文献

1
Workload-indexed blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes.职业室内运动员在最大运动测试中基于工作量指数的血压反应。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 25;28(13):1487-1494. doi: 10.1177/2047487320922043.
2
Sex differences in workload-indexed blood pressure response and vascular function among professional athletes and their utility for clinical exercise testing.运动员群体中心血管功能和血压反应的性别差异与工作量指数之间的关系,及其在临床运动测试中的应用。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jul;121(7):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04656-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Association of central blood pressure with an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise among elite athletes.中心血压与精英运动员运动时血压反应过度的关系。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Apr;124(4):1239-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05353-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Blood pressure response to graded bicycle exercise in males and females across the age and fitness spectrum.不同年龄和健康水平的男性和女性在分级自行车运动中的血压反应。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 6;32(1):43-51. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae262.
5
Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls.职业运动员与对照组的血压反应和血管功能
Sports Med Int Open. 2021 Apr 19;5(2):E45-E52. doi: 10.1055/a-1400-1897. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Association of 25-hydroxy vitamin D level with the blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes.25-羟维生素 D 水平与室内职业运动员最大运动试验血压反应的关系。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Aug;120(8):1931-1941. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04421-6. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Workload-indexed blood pressure response is superior to peak systolic blood pressure in predicting all-cause mortality.在预测全因死亡率方面,工作量指数化血压反应优于收缩压峰值。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Jun;27(9):978-987. doi: 10.1177/2047487319877268. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Age- and gender-specific upper limits and reference equations for workload-indexed systolic blood pressure response during bicycle ergometry.年龄和性别特异性的自行车运动时工作量指数化收缩压反应的上限和参考方程。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 13;28(12):1360-1369. doi: 10.1177/2047487320909667. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Sex-Based Differences in Peak Exercise Blood Pressure Indexed to Oxygen Consumption Among Competitive Athletes.竞技运动员中以氧耗量校正的最大运动血压的性别差异。
Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):11-22.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
10
Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Exercise in Endurance Athletes in Relation to Oxygen Uptake, Work Rate and Normative Values.耐力运动员运动时收缩压反应与摄氧量、工作负荷及正常参考值的关系
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jul 15;9(7):227. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9070227.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of systolic blood pressure response at the end of exercise and mortality and morbidity in patients referred for exercise testing.运动试验结束时收缩压反应模式与接受运动试验患者的死亡率和发病率
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 3;12(1):e003246. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003246.
2
Peak systolic blood pressure during preparticipation exercise testing in 12,083 athletes: age, sex, and workload-indexed values and predictors.12083名运动员参与运动前测试时的收缩压峰值:年龄、性别、工作量指数值及预测因素。
Front Physiol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1456331. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1456331. eCollection 2024.
3
Construction of neural network model for exercise load monitoring based on yoga training data and rehabilitation therapy.
基于瑜伽训练数据和康复治疗构建运动负荷监测神经网络模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(12):e32679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32679. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
4
Workload-indexed blood pressure response to exercise: considerations for future studies estimating maximal oxygen uptake.工作量指数化的运动血压反应:未来估算最大摄氧量研究的考量因素
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Sep 6;31(12):1553-1555. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae071.
5
Association of central blood pressure with an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise among elite athletes.中心血压与精英运动员运动时血压反应过度的关系。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Apr;124(4):1239-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05353-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
Former SARS-CoV-2 Infection Was Related to Decreased VO Peak and Exercise Hypertension in Athletes.既往感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2与运动员峰值摄氧量降低和运动性高血压有关。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1792. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101792.
7
Hypertensive Response to Exercise in Athletes: Unremarkable Finding or Relevant Marker for Future Cardiovascular Complications?运动员运动时的高血压反应:是无显著意义的发现还是未来心血管并发症的相关标志物?
Int J Hypertens. 2022 Nov 1;2022:8476751. doi: 10.1155/2022/8476751. eCollection 2022.
8
Exercise Hypertension in Athletes.运动员运动性高血压
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 19;11(16):4870. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164870.
9
Blood Pressure Response and Pulse Arrival Time During Exercise Testing in Well-Trained Individuals.训练有素个体运动测试期间的血压反应和脉搏波传导时间
Front Physiol. 2022 Jul 11;13:863855. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.863855. eCollection 2022.
10
Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Exercise in Endurance Athletes in Relation to Oxygen Uptake, Work Rate and Normative Values.耐力运动员运动时收缩压反应与摄氧量、工作负荷及正常参考值的关系
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jul 15;9(7):227. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9070227.