Bauer Pascal, Kraushaar Lutz, Dörr Oliver, Nef Holger, Hamm Christian W, Most Astrid
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Giessen, Germany.
Adiphea GmbH, Germany.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Oct 25;28(13):1487-1494. doi: 10.1177/2047487320922043.
Exercise testing is performed regularly in professional athletes. However, the blood pressure response (BPR) to exercise is rarely investigated in this cohort, and normative upper thresholds are lacking. Recently, a workload-indexed BPR (increase in systolic blood pressure per increase in metabolic equivalent of task (SBP/MET slope)) was evaluated in a general population and was compared with mortality. We sought to evaluate the SBP/MET slope in professional athletes and compare it with performance.
This was a cross-sectional study.
A total of 142 male professional indoor athletes (age 26 ± 5 years) were examined. Blood pressure was measured at rest and during a standardized, graded cycle ergometer test. We assessed the BPR during exercise, the workload, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET). Athletes were divided into groups according to their SBP/MET slope quartiles (I <4.3; II 4.3-6.2; III >6.2-9; IV >9 mmHg/MET) and compared regarding systolic BP (sBP) and workload achieved.
Athletes in group I (n = 42) had the lowest maximum sBP (180 ± 13 mmHg) but achieved the highest relative workload (4.2 ± 1 W/kg). With increasing SBP/MET slope, the maximum sBP increased (II (n = 56): 195 ± 15 mmHg; III (n = 44): 216 ± 16 mmHg) and the workload achieved decreased (II: 3.9 ± 0.7 W/kg; III: 3.3 ± 0.5 W/kg). The differences in sBP between these groups were significant (p < 0.001). None of the athletes were assigned to group IV (>9 mmHg/MET).
Athletes in the lowest SBP/MET slope quartile displayed the lowest maximum sBP but achieved a higher workload than athletes classified into the other SBP/MET slope groups. This simple, novel metric might help to distinguish a normal from an exaggerated BPR to exercise, to identify athletes at risk of developing hypertension.
运动测试在职业运动员中定期进行。然而,该队列中运动时的血压反应(BPR)很少被研究,且缺乏正常上限阈值。最近,在普通人群中评估了工作量指数化的BPR(每增加一个代谢当量任务时收缩压的增加量(SBP/MET斜率)),并与死亡率进行了比较。我们试图评估职业运动员的SBP/MET斜率,并将其与运动表现进行比较。
这是一项横断面研究。
共检查了142名男性职业室内运动员(年龄26±5岁)。在静息状态和标准化分级蹬车试验期间测量血压。我们评估了运动期间的BPR、工作量和代谢当量任务(MET)。运动员根据其SBP/MET斜率四分位数分组(I组<4.3;II组4.3 - 6.2;III组>6.2 - 9;IV组>9 mmHg/MET),并比较了收缩压(sBP)和达到的工作量。
I组(n = 42)的运动员最大sBP最低(180±13 mmHg),但达到的相对工作量最高(4.2±1 W/kg)。随着SBP/MET斜率增加,最大sBP升高(II组(n = 56):195±15 mmHg;III组(n = 44):216±16 mmHg),达到的工作量降低(II组:3.9±0.7 W/kg;III组:3.3±0.5 W/kg)。这些组之间的sBP差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。没有运动员被分配到IV组(>9 mmHg/MET)。
SBP/MET斜率四分位数最低的运动员最大sBP最低,但比其他SBP/MET斜率组的运动员达到更高的工作量。这个简单的新指标可能有助于区分正常与过度的运动BPR,识别有患高血压风险的运动员。