• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知觉/认知区分:对表象论的挑战。

The perception/cognition distincton: Challenging the representational account.

机构信息

Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cognitive Science and Language (CCiL), Edifici B, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103216. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103216. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103216
PMID:34649065
Abstract

A central goal for cognitive science and philosophy of mind is to distinguish between perception and cognition. The representational approach has emerged as a prominent candidate to draw such a distinction. The idea is that perception and cognition differ in the content and the format in which the information is represented -just as perceptual representations are nonconceptual in content and iconic in format, cognitive representations are conceptual in content and discursive in format. This paper argues against this view. I argue that both perception and cognition can use conceptual and nonconceptual contents and be vehiculated in iconic and discursive formats. If correct, the representational strategy to distinguish perception from cognition fails.

摘要

认知科学和心智哲学的一个核心目标是区分感知和认知。表象论作为一种突出的候选理论,旨在做出这种区分。其观点是,感知和认知在信息的内容和呈现格式上存在差异——就像知觉表象在内容上是非概念的,在格式上是形象的,认知表象在内容上是概念的,在格式上是推理的。本文反对这种观点。我认为,感知和认知都可以使用概念和非概念的内容,并以形象和推理的格式进行传递。如果正确的话,那么将感知和认知区分开来的表象策略就失败了。

相似文献

1
The perception/cognition distincton: Challenging the representational account.知觉/认知区分:对表象论的挑战。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103216. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103216. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Response to Glenberg: Conceptual content does not constrain the representational format of concepts.对格伦伯格的回应:概念内容并不限制概念的表征形式。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Jun;69(2):179-80. doi: 10.1037/cep0000059.
3
The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.城中最佳游戏:思维语言假说在认知科学中的复兴。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 6;46:e261. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002849.
4
An independent, empirical route to nonconceptual content.通往非概念内容的一条独立的、基于经验的路径。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
5
The burden of embodied cognition.具身认知的负担
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Jun;69(2):172-8. doi: 10.1037/cep0000060.
6
Qualitative character and sensory representation.定性特征与感觉表征。
Conscious Cogn. 2002 Dec;11(4):630-41. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00016-8.
7
Constructing a philosophy of science of cognitive science.构建认知科学的科学哲学
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):548-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01039.x.
8
Redundancy and Reducibility in the Formats of Spatial Representations.空间表示形式的冗余性和可约性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1778-1793. doi: 10.1177/17456916221077115. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain.表象几何:认知、计算与大脑的整合。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):401-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
10
What is embodied about cognition?认知所体现的是什么?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May 1;30(4):420-429. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.987791.