• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新手急诊医生对非创伤性患者腹部计算机断层扫描解读错误的影响因素。

Factors affecting incorrect interpretation of abdominal computed tomography in non-traumatic patients by novice emergency physicians.

作者信息

Lee Seong Geun, Cho Hanjin, Kim Joo Yeong, Song Juhyun, Park Jong-Hak

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;8(3):207-215. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.118. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.20.118
PMID:34649409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8517467/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Accurate interpretation of computed tomography (CT) scans is critical for patient care in the emergency department. We aimed to identify factors associated with an incorrect interpretation of abdominal CT by novice emergency residents and to analyze the characteristics of incorrectly interpreted scans.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a prospective observational cohort was conducted at three urban emergency departments. Discrepancies between the interpretations by postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) emergency residents and the final radiologists' reports were assessed by independent adjudicators. Potential factors associated with incorrect interpretation included patient age, sex, time of interpretation, and organ category. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for incorrect interpretation were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1,628 eligible cases, 270 (16.6%) were incorrect. The urinary system was the most correctly interpreted organ system (95.8%, 365/381), while the biliary tract was the most incorrectly interpreted (28.4%, 48/169). Normal CT images showed high false-positive rates of incorrect interpretation (28.2%, 96/340). Organ category was found to be a major determinant of incorrect interpretation. Using the urinary system as a reference, the aOR for incorrect interpretation of biliary tract disease was 9.20 (95% confidence interval, 5.0-16.90) and the aOR for incorrectly interpreting normal CT images was 8.47 (95% confidence interval, 4.85-14.78).

CONCLUSION

Biliary tract disease is a major factor associated with incorrect preliminary interpretations of abdominal CT scans by PGY-1 emergency residents. PGY-1 residents also showed high false-positive interpretation rates for normal CT images. Emergency residents' training should focus on these two areas to improve abdominal CT interpretation accuracy.

摘要

目的

准确解读计算机断层扫描(CT)对于急诊科患者的治疗至关重要。我们旨在确定与急诊住院医师对腹部CT解读错误相关的因素,并分析解读错误的扫描特征。

方法

在三个城市急诊科对一个前瞻性观察队列进行了这项回顾性分析。由独立评审员评估一年级住院医师(PGY-1)的解读与最终放射科医生报告之间的差异。与解读错误相关的潜在因素包括患者年龄、性别、解读时间和器官类别。使用多变量逻辑回归分析计算解读错误的调整优势比(aOR)。

结果

在1628例符合条件的病例中,270例(16.6%)解读错误。泌尿系统是解读最准确的器官系统(95.8%,365/381),而胆道系统是解读错误最多的(28.4%,48/169)。正常CT图像显示解读错误的假阳性率很高(28.2%,96/340)。发现器官类别是解读错误的主要决定因素。以泌尿系统为参照,胆道疾病解读错误的aOR为9.20(95%置信区间,5.0 - 16.90),正常CT图像解读错误的aOR为8.47(95%置信区间,4.85 - 14.78)。

结论

胆道疾病是与PGY-1急诊住院医师对腹部CT扫描初步解读错误相关的主要因素。PGY-1住院医师对正常CT图像的解读也显示出较高的假阳性率。急诊住院医师的培训应聚焦于这两个方面,以提高腹部CT解读的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/632e3225a404/ceem-20-118f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/1f31d6501047/ceem-20-118f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/52361c2e3fe6/ceem-20-118f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/632e3225a404/ceem-20-118f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/1f31d6501047/ceem-20-118f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/52361c2e3fe6/ceem-20-118f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce8/8517467/632e3225a404/ceem-20-118f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors affecting incorrect interpretation of abdominal computed tomography in non-traumatic patients by novice emergency physicians.新手急诊医生对非创伤性患者腹部计算机断层扫描解读错误的影响因素。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;8(3):207-215. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.118. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Learning curve and period of experience required for the competent diagnosis of acute appendicitis using abdominal computed tomography: a prospective observational study.使用腹部计算机断层扫描对急性阑尾炎进行准确诊断所需的学习曲线和经验期:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2017 Dec 30;4(4):222-231. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.209. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Evaluating the accuracy of emergency medicine resident interpretations of abdominal CTs in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.评估非创伤性腹痛患者腹部 CT 结果时,急诊住院医师的判读准确性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Oct;27(10):1255-60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.10.1255. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
4
Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.一级创伤中心躯干CT的住院医师夜间解读:文献分析与综述
Acad Radiol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.017. Epub 2009 May 30.
5
Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents.放射科住院医师对急诊室身体计算机断层扫描解读的差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;25(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.04.008.
6
Comparing the interpretation of emergency department computed tomography between emergency physicians and attending radiologists: A multicenter study.急诊科医生与放射科主治医生对急诊计算机断层扫描解读的比较:一项多中心研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;21(10):1323-1329. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_22_18.
7
Interpretation discrepancies of abdominal imaging by on-call radiology residents: Evaluation of risk factors.值班放射科住院医师对腹部影像学的解读差异:危险因素评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274313. eCollection 2022.
8
Interpretation of Computed Tomography of the Head: Emergency Physicians versus Radiologists.头部计算机断层扫描解读:急诊医师与放射科医师的比较
Trauma Mon. 2013 Sep;18(2):86-9. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.12023. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department.放射科住院医师对急诊科头部CT扫描医嘱的评估。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Jan;23(1):103-7.
10
Surgical residents' interpretation of diagnostic radiologic imaging in the traumatically injured patient.外科住院医师对创伤患者诊断性放射影像的解读
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jan;84(1):146-149. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001701.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Gallbladder Width Measurement by Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis.计算机断层扫描测量胆囊宽度在急性胆囊炎诊断中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;12(3):721. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030721.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning curve and period of experience required for the competent diagnosis of acute appendicitis using abdominal computed tomography: a prospective observational study.使用腹部计算机断层扫描对急性阑尾炎进行准确诊断所需的学习曲线和经验期:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2017 Dec 30;4(4):222-231. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.209. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Diagnostic Errors: Impact of an Educational Intervention on Pediatric Primary Care.诊断错误:教育干预对儿科初级保健的影响。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;32(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
3
Impact of CT in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain.
CT对因急性腹痛就诊于急诊科的老年患者的影响。
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2877-82. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0419-7.
4
Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework.推动医疗保健中诊断错误测量科学的发展:更安全诊断框架
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003675. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
5
Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.放射科住院医师连续工作超过 10 小时后,初步报告中的错误率增加。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Mar;20(3):305-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.028.
6
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
7
Evaluating the accuracy of emergency medicine resident interpretations of abdominal CTs in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.评估非创伤性腹痛患者腹部 CT 结果时,急诊住院医师的判读准确性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Oct;27(10):1255-60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.10.1255. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Trends of CT use in the adult emergency department in a tertiary academic hospital of Korea during 2001-2010.2001-2010 年韩国一家三级学术医院成人急诊科 CT 使用趋势。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Sep-Oct;13(5):536-40. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.5.536. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guides management decisions: a prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center.腹部骨盆 CT 增加诊断确定性并指导管理决策:在大型学术医疗中心对 584 例患者进行的前瞻性研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):238-43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4467.
10
Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008.1999 - 2008年美国因胸痛和腹痛前往急诊科就诊的情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Sep(43):1-8.