Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 14;22(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04758-9.
Reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis during spinal fusion surgery is important for improving the fusion rate and restoring the sagittal alignment. Despite the variety of reduction methods, the fundamental mechanics of lumbar spondylolisthesis reduction remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behavior while performing spondylolisthesis reduction with the anterior and posterior lever reduction method.
We developed an L4-L5 spondylolisthesis model using sawbones. Two spine surgeons performed the simulated reduction with a customized Cobb elevator. The following data were collected: the torque and angular motion of Cobb, displacement of vertebral bodies, change of lordotic angle between L4 and L5, total axial force and torque applied on the model, and force received by adjacent disc.
Less torque value (116 N-cm vs. 155 N-cm) and greater angular motion (53 vs. 38) of Cobb elevator were observed in anterior lever reduction. Moreover, the total axial force received by the entire model was greater in the posterior lever method than that in the anterior lever method (40.8 N vs. 16.38 N). Besides, the displacement of both vertebral bodies was greater in the anterior lever method.
The anterior lever reduction is a more effort-saving method than the posterior lever reduction method. The existing evidence supports the biomechanical advantage of the anterior reduction method, which might be one of the contributing factors to successfully treating high-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with short-segment instrumentation.
脊柱融合术中腰椎滑脱的复位对于提高融合率和恢复矢状位排列非常重要。尽管复位方法多种多样,但腰椎滑脱复位的基本力学机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨前后杠杆复位法治疗腰椎滑脱的生物力学行为。
我们使用Sawbones 制作了一个 L4-L5 滑脱模型。两名脊柱外科医生使用定制的 Cobb 抬扳进行模拟复位。收集的数据包括 Cobb 的扭矩和角运动、椎体的位移、L4 和 L5 之间的前凸角变化、施加在模型上的总轴向力和扭矩以及相邻椎间盘所受的力。
在前杠杆复位中,Cobb 抬扳的扭矩值(116N-cm 比 155N-cm)更小,角运动更大(53 比 38)。此外,在后杠杆复位法中,整个模型所承受的总轴向力大于前杠杆复位法(40.8N 比 16.38N)。此外,在前杠杆复位法中,两个椎体的位移更大。
前杠杆复位法比后杠杆复位法更省力。现有的证据支持前复位法的生物力学优势,这可能是短节段器械成功治疗高分级腰椎滑脱的原因之一。