• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府政策对全球 COVID-19 传播的影响。

Effects of government policies on the spread of COVID-19 worldwide.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99368-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-99368-9
PMID:34650119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8516948/
Abstract

The outbreak of novel COVID-19 disease elicited a wide range of anti-contagion and economic policies like school closure, income support, contact tracing, and so forth, in the mitigation and suppression of the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, a systematic evaluation of these policies has not been made. Here, 17 implemented policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker dataset employed in 90 countries from December 31, 2019, to August 31, 2020, were analyzed. A Poisson regression model was applied to analyze the relationship between policies and daily confirmed cases using a generalized estimating equations approach. A lag is a fixed time displacement in time series data. With that, lagging (0, 3, 7, 10, and 14 days) was also considered during the analysis since the effects of policies implemented on a given day may affect the number of confirmed cases several days after implementation. The countries were divided into three groups depending on the number of waves of the pandemic observed in each country. Through subgroup analysis, we showed that with and without lagging, contact tracing and containment policies were significant for countries with two waves, while closing, economic, and health policies were significant for countries with three waves. Wave-specific analysis for each wave showed that significant health, economic, and containment policies varied across waves of the pandemic. Emergency investment in healthcare was consistently significant among the three groups of countries, while the Stringency index was significant among all waves of the pandemic. These findings may help in making informed decisions regarding whether, which, or when these policies should be intensified or lifted.

摘要

新型 COVID-19 疾病的爆发引发了广泛的抗传染病和经济政策,如学校关闭、收入支持、接触者追踪等,以减轻和抑制 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的传播。然而,这些政策尚未进行系统评估。在这里,分析了来自牛津 COVID-19 政府反应追踪器数据集的 17 项政策,这些政策于 2019 年 12 月 31 日至 2020 年 8 月 31 日在 90 个国家实施。采用泊松回归模型,通过广义估计方程方法分析政策与每日确诊病例之间的关系。滞后是时间序列数据中的固定时间位移。因此,在分析中还考虑了滞后(0、3、7、10 和 14 天),因为在给定日期实施的政策的影响可能会在实施后几天影响确诊病例的数量。根据每个国家观察到的大流行波数,将这些国家分为三组。通过亚组分析,我们表明,无论是否滞后,接触者追踪和遏制政策对有两波大流行的国家是显著的,而关闭、经济和卫生政策对有三波大流行的国家是显著的。针对每一波的波特定分析表明,重大的卫生、经济和遏制政策在大流行的各个波中都有所不同。紧急投资于医疗保健在这三个国家组中始终是显著的,而严格指数在所有大流行波中都是显著的。这些发现可能有助于就这些政策是否应该加强或取消做出明智的决策,以及在何时加强或取消。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/13a4f445cede/41598_2021_99368_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/0699fdf22da2/41598_2021_99368_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/53aeda831af7/41598_2021_99368_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/363519c29ee7/41598_2021_99368_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/13a4f445cede/41598_2021_99368_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/0699fdf22da2/41598_2021_99368_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/53aeda831af7/41598_2021_99368_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/363519c29ee7/41598_2021_99368_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8516948/13a4f445cede/41598_2021_99368_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of government policies on the spread of COVID-19 worldwide.政府政策对全球 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99368-9.
2
Statistical Estimation of Effects of Implemented Government Policies on COVID-19 Situation in South Korea.统计估计实施的政府政策对韩国 COVID-19 疫情状况的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042144.
3
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Public health matters: why is Latin America struggling in addressing the pandemic?公共卫生事务:为何拉丁美洲在应对大流行方面举步维艰?
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Mar;42(1):27-40. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00269-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
6
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Critical policies disparity of the first and second waves of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom.英国第一波和第二波 COVID-19 期间的关键政策差距。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 22;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01723-3.
8
Government responses and COVID-19 deaths: Global evidence across multiple pandemic waves.政府应对措施与 COVID-19 死亡人数:多次大流行浪潮中的全球证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253116. eCollection 2021.
9
Estimating the COVID-19 Spread Through Real-time Population Mobility Patterns: Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.基于实时人口流动模式估算 COVID-19 传播:在中低收入国家的监测。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e22999. doi: 10.2196/22999.
10
Modeling for the Stringency of Lock-Down Policies: Effects of Macroeconomic and Healthcare Variables in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.建模锁定政策的严格程度:应对 COVID-19 大流行的宏观经济和医疗变量的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 25;10:872704. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872704. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Key lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Role of intensive care, politics and science communication (Review).2019冠状病毒病大流行的关键经验教训:重症监护、政治及科学传播的作用(综述)
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Aug 8;5(5):60. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.259. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
2
Impact of immobility and mobility activities on the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from European countries.行动不便与活动对新冠病毒传播的影响:来自欧洲国家的证据。
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Jul 19. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12565.
3
COVID-19 vaccination atlas using an integrative systems vaccinology approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Which National Factors Are Most Influential in the Spread of COVID-19?哪些国家因素对新冠病毒的传播影响最大?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147592.
2
COVID-19 second wave mortality in Europe and the United States.欧洲和美国的 COVID-19 第二波死亡人数。
Chaos. 2021 Mar;31(3):031105. doi: 10.1063/5.0041569.
3
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
采用综合系统疫苗学方法的2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种图谱
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jun 2;10(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01148-3.
4
Paternal Depression and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间父亲的抑郁和焦虑
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 19;22(1):124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010124.
5
Qualitative comparative analysis of policies implemented by 26 European countries during the 2020 great lockdown.26 个欧洲国家 2020 年大封锁期间实施政策的定性比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;12:1396013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396013. eCollection 2024.
6
Why nanny statism matters: evidence from the first wave of COVID-19.为何家长式作风很重要:来自第一波 COVID-19 疫情的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):1963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19477-8.
7
Inequalities in regional excess mortality and life expectancy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.欧洲 COVID-19 大流行期间区域超额死亡率和预期寿命的不平等。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 15;14(1):3835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54366-5.
8
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
9
Female Leadership during COVID-19: The Effectiveness of Diverse Approaches towards Mitigation Management during a Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的女性领导力:多元化方法在大流行期间缓解管理中的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 6;20(21):7023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20217023.
10
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Potentially adaptive SARS-CoV-2 mutations discovered with novel spatiotemporal and explainable AI models.利用新型时空可解释人工智能模型发现具有潜在适应性的 SARS-CoV-2 突变。
Genome Biol. 2020 Dec 23;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02191-0.
5
COVID-19 in the United States: Trajectories and second surge behavior.美国的 COVID-19:轨迹和第二波疫情行为。
Chaos. 2020 Sep;30(9):091102. doi: 10.1063/5.0024204.
6
Mutations Strengthened SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity.突变增强了 SARS-CoV-2 的感染性。
J Mol Biol. 2020 Sep 4;432(19):5212-5226. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
7
COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0).COVID-19 政府应对事件数据集(CoronaNet v.1.0)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):756-768. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0909-7. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic.大规模防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):262-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
9
Predicting turning point, duration and attack rate of COVID-19 outbreaks in major Western countries.预测西方国家主要新冠疫情的转折点、持续时间和感染率。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Jun;135:109829. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109829. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study.控制策略对减少社交接触以控制中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情的效果:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6. Epub 2020 Mar 25.