Bovonratwet Patawut, Retzky Julia S, Chen Aaron Z, Ondeck Nathaniel T, Samuel Andre M, Qureshi Sheeraz A, Grauer Jonathan N, Albert Todd J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Mar 1;35(2):E306-E313. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001252.
Retrospective cohort comparison study.
The aim was to compare perioperative complications and 30-day readmission between ambulatory and inpatient posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy is increasingly being performed as an ambulatory procedure. Despite this increase, there is a lack of published literature documenting the safety of ambulatory PCF.
Patients who underwent PCF (through laminotomy or laminectomy) were identified in the 2005-2018 NSQIP database. Ambulatory procedures were defined as cases that had hospital length of stay=0 days. Inpatient procedures were defined as cases that had length of stay=1-4 days. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and procedural variables (laminotomy or laminectomy performed) were compared between the 2 cohorts. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for postoperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the 2 groups.
In total, 795 ambulatory and 1789 inpatient single-level PCF cases were identified. After matching, there were 795 ambulatory and 795 inpatient cases. Statistical analysis after propensity score matching revealed no significant difference in individual complications including 30-day readmission, thromboembolic events, wound complications, and reoperation, or aggregated complications between ambulatory versus matched inpatient procedures. Overall 30-day readmissions after ambulatory single-level PCF were noted for 2.46% of the study population, and the most common reasons were surgical site infections (46%) and pain control (15%).
The perioperative outcomes assessed in this study support the conclusion that single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy can be performed for correctly selected patients in the ambulatory setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient procedures.
Level III.
回顾性队列比较研究。
旨在比较美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中门诊和住院颈椎后路椎间孔切开术(PCF)的围手术期并发症及30天再入院情况。
针对神经根型颈椎病的单节段PCF越来越多地作为门诊手术进行。尽管此类手术有所增加,但缺乏已发表的文献记录门诊PCF的安全性。
在2005 - 2018年NSQIP数据库中识别接受PCF(通过椎板切开术或椎板切除术)的患者。门诊手术定义为住院时间 = 0天的病例。住院手术定义为住院时间 = 1 - 4天的病例。比较两个队列之间的患者特征、合并症和手术变量(是否进行椎板切开术或椎板切除术)。然后对两组术后并发症和30天再入院情况进行倾向评分匹配比较。
共识别出795例门诊单节段PCF病例和1789例住院单节段PCF病例。匹配后,有795例门诊病例和795例住院病例。倾向评分匹配后的统计分析显示,包括30天再入院、血栓栓塞事件、伤口并发症和再次手术等个体并发症,或门诊手术与匹配的住院手术之间的综合并发症,均无显著差异。门诊单节段PCF术后总体30天再入院率为研究人群的2.46%,最常见原因是手术部位感染(46%)和疼痛控制(15%)。
本研究评估的围手术期结果支持以下结论:对于正确选择的患者,在门诊环境下进行针对神经根型颈椎病的单节段PCF,与住院手术相比,围手术期30天并发症或再入院率不会增加。
三级。