Zhang Shuoya, Wang Jiagao, Ran Ran, Peng Yuchuan, Xiao Yun
Department of Anesthesiology, Jinzhou Medical University Union Training Base, Jinzhou, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Jan;47(1):55-60. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13525. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of remimazolam tosylate and propofol for hysteroscopy.
From November 2020 to June 2021, a total of 90 patients who underwent hysteroscopy were prospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: propofol group (group A), low-dose remimazolam tosylate group (group B), and high-dose remimazolam tosylate group (group C), with 30 cases in each group. All cases received intravenous sufentanil 0.1ug/kg for analgesic preconditioning. Patients in group A were given 2 mg/kg propofol intravenously, and maintained at a rate of 5 mg/kg/h. Patients in groups B and C were given intravenous remimazolam tosylate 0.25 mg/kg. Group B was maintained with remimazolam tosylate at a rate of 0.48 mg/kg/h, while group C was at a rate of 0.6 mg/kg/h. The changes of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) were recorded after admission (T0), 1 min after anaesthesia (T1), dilation of the uterine cavity (T2), and the end of hysteroscopy (T3). In addition, Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after hysteroscopy, the incidence of adverse events, and the time from the end of the hysteroscopy to reach the discharge standard, were recorded.
The success rate of sedation in each group was 100%. After administration, the adverse event incidence in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C (p < 0.05, respectively). Compared with propofol, remimazolam tosylate did not cause injection pain, had less impact on haemodynamics and caused less respiratory depression.
Remimazolam tosylate and propofol have similar success rates for painless hysteroscopy, and both can provide safe and effective sedation. The safety of remimazolam tosylate for hysteroscopy appears to be better than that of propofol.
比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于宫腔镜检查的有效性和安全性。
2020年11月至2021年6月,前瞻性纳入90例行宫腔镜检查的患者。将患者随机分为三组:丙泊酚组(A组)、低剂量甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(B组)和高剂量甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(C组),每组30例。所有病例均静脉注射舒芬太尼0.1μg/kg进行镇痛预处理。A组患者静脉注射丙泊酚2mg/kg,并以5mg/(kg·h)的速度维持。B组和C组患者静脉注射甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑0.25mg/kg。B组以0.48mg/(kg·h)的速度用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑维持,而C组以0.6mg/(kg·h)的速度维持。记录入院后(T0)、麻醉后1分钟(T1)、宫腔扩张时(T2)和宫腔镜检查结束时(T3)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和外周血氧饱和度(SpO₂)的变化。此外,记录宫腔镜检查后1分钟、3分钟和5分钟时的观察者警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)、不良事件发生率以及从宫腔镜检查结束到达到出院标准的时间。
每组的镇静成功率均为100%。给药后,A组的不良事件发生率显著高于B组和C组(分别为p<0.05)。与丙泊酚相比,甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑不会引起注射痛,对血流动力学影响较小,且引起的呼吸抑制较少。
甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚用于无痛宫腔镜检查的成功率相似,且均可提供安全有效的镇静。甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于宫腔镜检查的安全性似乎优于丙泊酚。