Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):86-98. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3993. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence suggests contrasting health effects for leisure-time and occupational physical activity. In this systematic review, we synthesized and described the epidemiological evidence regarding the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, from database inception to 17 April 2020. Articles were included if they described original observational prospective research, assessing the association between occupational physical activity and CVD mortality among adult workers. Reviews were included if they controlled for age and gender and at least one other relevant variable. We performed meta-analyses on the associations between occupational physical activity and CVD mortality. RESULTS: We screened 3345 unique articles, and 31 articles (from 23 studies) were described in this review. In the meta-analysis, occupational physical activity showed no significant association with overall CVD mortality for both males [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.15] and females (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.09). Additional analysis showed that higher levels of occupational physical activity were non-significantly associated with a 15% increase in studies reporting on the outcome ischemic heart disease mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: While the beneficial association between leisure-time physical activity and CVD mortality has been widely documented, occupational physical activity was not found to have a beneficial association with CVD mortality. This observation may have implications for our appreciation of the association between physical activity and health for workers in physically demanding jobs, as occupational physical activity may not be health enhancing.
目的:新出现的证据表明,闲暇时间和职业体力活动对健康的影响不同。在本系统评价中,我们综合并描述了职业体力活动与心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率之间关联的流行病学证据。
方法:我们在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews 数据库中进行了文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立到 2020 年 4 月 17 日。如果文章描述了原始的观察性前瞻性研究,评估了成年工人职业体力活动与 CVD 死亡率之间的关联,则将其纳入。如果综述控制了年龄和性别以及至少一个其他相关变量,则将其纳入。我们对职业体力活动与 CVD 死亡率之间的关联进行了荟萃分析。
结果:我们筛选了 3345 篇独特的文章,其中 31 篇文章(来自 23 项研究)在本综述中进行了描述。在荟萃分析中,职业体力活动与男性(危险比 [HR] 1.00,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.87-1.15)和女性(HR 0.95,95% CI 0.82-1.09)的总体 CVD 死亡率均无显著关联。进一步分析表明,在报告缺血性心脏病死亡率结局的研究中,较高水平的职业体力活动与 15%的死亡率增加呈非显著相关(HR 1.15,95% CI 0.88-1.49)。
结论:虽然闲暇时间体力活动与 CVD 死亡率之间的有益关联已得到广泛证实,但职业体力活动与 CVD 死亡率之间并无关联。这一观察结果可能对我们理解体力活动与从事体力要求高的工作的工人健康之间的关联产生影响,因为职业体力活动可能不会增强健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Lancet Public Health. 2021-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-10-3