• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预备模拟根管内桩道后剩余牙本质厚度和预成桩与根管预备形态的适合性。

Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Dec;152(12):1020-1032.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2021.06.014
PMID:34656294
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post space preparation can increase the risk of experiencing perforation and root fracture. The authors assessed remaining dentin thickness after post space preparation and the fit of different prefabricated posts to root canal preparation systems in a theoretical model.

METHODS

Ten datasets per type of tooth from cone-beam computed tomography were analyzed to determine the minimum root diameter from 5 through 13 mm from the apical foramen. The preparation shapes of 10 root canal preparation systems were calculated and compared with the root dimensions to determine the remaining dentin thickness. Eight post brands were compared with root dimensions to determine the areas where there was less than 1 mm dentin thickness.

RESULTS

The average root canal preparation shape produced canal diameters of 0.57 mm at 5 mm from the canal terminus and 0.94 mm at 13 mm from the canal terminus. The mean post size tip diameter was 1.03 mm, which is larger than the dimensions of the average canal preparation. Post preparation would result in less than 1 mm of dentin thickness remaining in premolars, smaller roots of molars, and mandibular incisors. The area with less than 1 mm of dentin thickness was around the post tip.

CONCLUSIONS

Endosequence Fiber Post (Brasseler USA), RelyX Fiber Post 3D (3M), and Rebilda (VOCO) were the better fitting posts with the root canal preparation shapes.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Many posts would result in less than 1 mm dentin thickness. Clinicians should use posts that fit their root canal preparations to minimize dentin removal.

摘要

背景

后牙根管预备会增加穿孔和根折的风险。作者通过理论模型评估了后牙根管预备后剩余牙本质厚度以及不同预成桩与根管预备系统的适配性。

方法

对来源于锥形束 CT 的每颗牙 10 个数据集进行分析,以确定从根尖孔起 5-13mm 处的最小根管直径。计算了 10 种根管预备系统的预备形状,并与根管尺寸进行比较,以确定剩余牙本质厚度。将 8 种桩品牌与根管尺寸进行比较,以确定牙本质厚度小于 1mm 的区域。

结果

平均根管预备形状在距根管末端 5mm 处产生 0.57mm 的根管直径,在距根管末端 13mm 处产生 0.94mm 的根管直径。平均桩尖端直径为 1.03mm,大于平均根管预备的尺寸。在后牙牙本质预备中,前磨牙、磨牙较小的根以及下颌切牙的剩余牙本质厚度将小于 1mm。牙本质厚度小于 1mm 的区域在桩尖端周围。

结论

Endosequence Fiber Post(Brasseler USA)、RelyX Fiber Post 3D(3M)和 Rebilda(VOCO)是与根管预备形状适配性更好的桩。

临床意义

许多桩会导致剩余牙本质厚度小于 1mm。临床医生应选择与根管预备相适配的桩,以最大程度减少牙本质的去除。

相似文献

1
Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes.预备模拟根管内桩道后剩余牙本质厚度和预成桩与根管预备形态的适合性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Dec;152(12):1020-1032.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.使用平行边钻进行根管和桩道预备后上颌第一前磨牙分叉处的剩余牙本质厚度
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Apr;99(4):267-73. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60059-1.
3
Minimum residual root dentin thickness of mandibular premolars restored with a post: A finite element analysis study.下颌前磨牙根管桩修复后最小剩余牙根牙本质厚度的有限元分析研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 May;131(5):878-885. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
Effect of the size of the apical enlargement with rotary instruments, single-cone filling, post space preparation with drills, fiber post removal, and root canal filling removal on apical crack initiation and propagation.使用旋转器械进行根尖扩大的尺寸、单锥充填、用钻制备桩道、去除纤维桩以及去除根管充填物对根尖裂纹起始和扩展的影响。
J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
6
Effect of canal preparation with XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Next on root canal geometry and dentin thickness of mandibular premolars with radicular grooves and two canals: a micro-CT study.XP-endo Shaper 和 ProTaper Next 预备根管对有根管侧支和双根管下颌前磨牙根管形态和牙本质厚度的影响:一项 micro-CT 研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5505-5512. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03858-z. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Microcomputer tomography measurement of minimum residual dentin thickness in mandibular first molars after virtual fiber post placement.下颌第一磨牙虚拟纤维桩修复后最小剩余牙本质厚度的体视学测量
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):506-513. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.018. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
[Residual dentin thickness in first premolars after root canal preparation].[根管预备后第一前磨牙的剩余牙本质厚度]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;29(4):361-4.
9
The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars.使用盖茨-格利登钻进行根管预备后对下颌磨牙远中根剩余牙本质厚度的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul;135(7):903-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0336.
10
Effect of Application Mode on Bond Strength of Adhesively Luted Glass-fiber Bundles Inside the Root Canal.应用方式对根管内玻璃纤维束黏结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(6):517-524. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43507.

引用本文的文献

1
Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters.不同直径玻璃纤维根管桩的推出粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 25;17(7):1492. doi: 10.3390/ma17071492.
2
Expert consensus on digital guided therapy for endodontic diseases.牙髓病数字化诊疗专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2023 Dec 6;15(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00261-0.
3
Evaluation of Dentinal Thickness and Remaining Dentine Volume around Root Canals Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估根管周围牙本质厚度和剩余牙本质体积
Dent J (Basel). 2023 May 4;11(5):124. doi: 10.3390/dj11050124.