• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同直径玻璃纤维根管桩的推出粘结强度

Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters.

作者信息

Rajnics Zsolt, Pammer Dávid, Kőnig-Péter Anikó, Turzó Kinga, Marada Gyula, Radnai Márta

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Dental School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary.

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 25;17(7):1492. doi: 10.3390/ma17071492.

DOI:10.3390/ma17071492
PMID:38612007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11013009/
Abstract

(1) Background: The retention of intraradicular posts is an important factor for the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength (PBS) of the posts relating to their diameter and region of the root. (2) Methods: A total of 40 premolar teeth (decoronated and root canal-filled) were divided into four groups (n = 10). After post-space preparation, different sizes (1.0, 1.2, 1.5, and 2.0 mm) of glass fiber posts were luted with resin cement into the root canals. After placement, 2 mm thick slices were cut from the roots according to their apical, middle, and coronal regions (n = 116). Push-out tests were carried out in a universal testing machine on each slice. A statistical evaluation of the data was applied. (3) Results: When comparing the diameter, the 2.0 mm posts had the highest PBS (111.99 ± 10.40 N), while the 1.0 mm posts had the lowest PBS (99.98 ± 8.05 N). Divided by the surface of the bonded area, the average PBS value was the highest for the 1.0 mm posts (18.20 ± 1.67 MPa) and the lowest for the 2.0 mm posts (12.08 ± 1.05 MPa). (4) Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, when comparing the regions of the roots, no significant differences were found among the PBS values of the three regions ( = 0.219). When comparing the diameters, significant differences were shown between the PBS values of the four groups ( = 0.023 and = 0.003, respectively).

摘要

(1) 背景:根管内桩的固位是根管治疗后牙齿预后的重要因素。本研究的目的是评估桩的推出粘结强度(PBS)与其直径和牙根区域的关系。(2) 方法:将40颗前磨牙(去冠并根管充填)分为四组(n = 10)。在制备桩道后,将不同尺寸(1.0、1.2、1.5和2.0 mm)的玻璃纤维桩用树脂粘结剂粘结到根管内。放置后,根据牙根的根尖、中部和冠部区域从牙根上切下2 mm厚的切片(n = 116)。在万能试验机上对每个切片进行推出试验。对数据进行统计学评估。(3) 结果:比较直径时,2.0 mm的桩具有最高的PBS(111.99 ± 10.40 N),而1.0 mm的桩具有最低的PBS(99.98 ± 8.05 N)。按粘结面积表面划分,1.0 mm的桩平均PBS值最高(18.20 ± 1.67 MPa),2.0 mm的桩最低(12.08 ± 1.05 MPa)。(4) 结论:在本研究的局限性内,比较牙根区域时,三个区域的PBS值之间未发现显著差异( = 0.219)。比较直径时,四组的PBS值之间显示出显著差异(分别为 = 0.023和 = 0.003)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/7379dc26cc35/materials-17-01492-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/b79d8a61d3ea/materials-17-01492-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/76484e70d282/materials-17-01492-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/7379dc26cc35/materials-17-01492-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/b79d8a61d3ea/materials-17-01492-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/76484e70d282/materials-17-01492-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c0/11013009/7379dc26cc35/materials-17-01492-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters.不同直径玻璃纤维根管桩的推出粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 25;17(7):1492. doi: 10.3390/ma17071492.
2
Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.牙根牙本质与三种玻璃纤维桩系统之间的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jul;96(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005.
3
Push-Out Bond Strength of Endodontic Posts Cemented to Extracted Teeth: An In-Vitro Evaluation.粘结于拔除牙的根管桩的推出粘结强度:一项体外评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;15(19):6792. doi: 10.3390/ma15196792.
4
Surface modification of glass fiber-reinforced composite posts to enhance their bond strength to resin-matrix cements: an integrative review.玻璃纤维增强复合桩的表面改性以提高其与树脂基质水门汀的粘结强度:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):95-107. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04221-y. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Push-out Bond Strength of Two Types of Dental Post Luted with Two Types of Cement at Two Different Root Levels.两种不同牙根水平下,用两种黏固剂黏结的两种类型牙桩的推出粘结强度。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Sep;54(3):263-272. doi: 10.15644/asc54/3/4.
6
Comparison of push-out bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite resin posts according to cement thickness.比较不同粘结剂厚度下纤维增强复合材料树脂桩的推出强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Effect of curing modes of dual-curing luting systems and root regions on retention of translucent fiber posts in root canals.双固化粘接系统的固化方式及根管区域对根管内半透明纤维桩固位力的影响
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Jun;10(3):219-26.
8
Influence of the Resin Cement Thickness on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts.树脂水门汀厚度对玻璃纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响
Braz Dent J. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):592-598. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600886.
9
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Aesthetic Type of Posts at Different Regions of Root Canal after Application of Adhesive Resin Cement.应用粘结树脂水门汀后,美学型桩在根管不同区域的粘结强度评估。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jun 30;7(13):2167-2172. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.580. eCollection 2019 Jul 15.
10
Effect of endodontic sealers on push-out bond strength of cemented fiber posts.根管封闭剂对粘结纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2015 Apr;46(4):299-307. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a33283.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors that affect the outcomes of root canal treatment and retreatment-A reframing of the principles.影响根管治疗和再治疗结果的因素——原则的重新构建
Int Endod J. 2023 Mar;56 Suppl 2:82-115. doi: 10.1111/iej.13897. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Push-Out Bond Strength of Endodontic Posts Cemented to Extracted Teeth: An In-Vitro Evaluation.粘结于拔除牙的根管桩的推出粘结强度:一项体外评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;15(19):6792. doi: 10.3390/ma15196792.
3
Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
比较用玻璃纤维增强或金属桩修复的根管治疗牙的存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr;131(4):567-578. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes.预备模拟根管内桩道后剩余牙本质厚度和预成桩与根管预备形态的适合性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Dec;152(12):1020-1032.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Is a fiber post better than a metal post for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.纤维桩和金属桩修复根管治疗后的牙齿,哪种更好?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103750. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103750. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Post Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Different Adhesive Bonding Systems.使用不同粘结系统的自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的纤维增强复合树脂桩的推出粘结强度评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;14(13):3639. doi: 10.3390/ma14133639.
7
Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface.根据根管表面,用粘结剂和自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的玻璃纤维桩的推出粘结强度。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Jan;33(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature.根管治疗后的牙齿修复:临床文献回顾。
Int Endod J. 2021 Apr;54(4):509-535. doi: 10.1111/iej.13438. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin.玻璃纤维桩适配性对其与牙根牙本质抗推出粘结强度的影响。
Braz Dent J. 2019 Jul 22;30(4):350-355. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902491.
10
Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study.通过三点测试和扫描电子显微镜分析评估中空根管桩的力学性能:一项初步研究。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;12(12):1983. doi: 10.3390/ma12121983.