• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中重度慢性斑块状银屑病患者中,AVT02 与阿达木单抗原研药的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行分组、阳性对照、III 期研究。

Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of AVT02 Versus Originator Adalimumab in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Active Control, Phase III Study.

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.

The University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2021 Nov;35(6):735-748. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00502-w. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s40259-021-00502-w
PMID:34657274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8520467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

AVT02 (adalimumab) is a proposed biosimilar to Humira. AVT02 is produced at a 100 mg/mL concentration with a citrate-free formulation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of AVT02 versus Humira in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomised, parallel group, active control study of adult subjects compared (at a 1:1 ratio) AVT02 with originator adalimumab 80 mg subcutaneously in Week 1, then 40 mg every other week. At Week 16, subjects who had received originator adalimumab were re-randomised at a 1:1 ratio to continue receiving originator adalimumab, or to switch to AVT02, every other week until Week 48, with final efficacy endpoint at Week 50. Subjects who initially received AVT02 continued to receive AVT02 from Week 16 to Week 48. The primary endpoint was percentage improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at Week 16. Secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage improvement in PASI score at additional timepoints, change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score and number and percentage of subjects achieving static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) responses of 'clear' or 'almost clear'. Additional secondary endpoints included comparison of adverse event profiles, anti-drug antibodies and neutralising antibodies, and serum trough levels of adalimumab at steady state.

RESULTS

A total of 413 subjects were randomised (205 to AVT02 and 208 to originator). The percentage improvement in PASI score at Week 16 was 91.6% for AVT02-treated subjects and 89.6% for originator adalimumab. The 90% confidence intervals for the primary endpoint were within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ±10% (90% CI - 0.76 to 5.29; 95% CI - 1.34 to 5.88), and a comparable pattern for DLQI score (11.4-point and 10.6-point improvement in AVT02-treated and originator adalimumab-treated groups, respectively) and sPGA (90.5% in both groups achieving 'clear' or 'almost clear') at Week 16 supported the assessment. Efficacy persisted through Week 50 of the study in all treatment groups, including those who switched from originator adalimumab to AVT02, for percent improvement in PASI score, quality-of-life assessment and sPGA. The safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles between AVT02 and originator adalimumab were similar at Week 16, and this persisted in the switched and continued groups through Week 50.

CONCLUSION

Objective and subjective measures of efficacy supported the evaluation of biosimilarity between AVT02 and originator adalimumab at Week 16 and until Week 50, in switched and continued treatment groups. AVT02 was safe and well tolerated, with a safety and immunogenicity profile similar to that observed in originator adalimumab with no clinically meaningful difference between the two.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2017-003367-35; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03849404.

摘要

背景

AVT02(阿达木单抗)是一种拟议的与修美乐生物相似的药物。AVT02 以 100mg/ml 的浓度生产,采用无柠檬酸盐配方。

目的

本研究旨在比较 AVT02 与 Humira 在中重度慢性斑块型银屑病患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。

方法

这是一项双盲、随机、平行组、活性对照研究,比较了成人受试者(1:1 比例)在第 1 周接受 AVT02 与阿达木单抗 80mg 皮下注射,然后每两周接受 40mg。在第 16 周,接受阿达木单抗的受试者按 1:1 的比例重新随机分组,继续接受阿达木单抗或每两周接受一次 AVT02,直到第 48 周,第 50 周为最终疗效终点。从第 16 周开始,最初接受 AVT02 的受试者继续接受 AVT02 至第 48 周。主要终点是第 16 周时 PASI 评分的改善百分比。次要疗效终点包括在其他时间点 PASI 评分的改善百分比、从基线到皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分的变化,以及达到静态医生总体评估(sPGA)“清除”或“几乎清除”反应的受试者数量和百分比。其他次要终点包括不良事件谱、抗药物抗体和中和抗体以及稳态时阿达木单抗血清浓度的比较。

结果

共有 413 名受试者随机分组(205 名接受 AVT02 治疗,208 名接受阿达木单抗治疗)。第 16 周时,AVT02 治疗组 PASI 评分改善率为 91.6%,阿达木单抗治疗组为 89.6%。主要终点的 90%置信区间在预先定义的 10%等效性边界内(90%CI-0.76 至 5.29;95%CI-1.34 至 5.88),并且在第 16 周时,DLQI 评分(AVT02 治疗组和阿达木单抗治疗组分别改善 11.4 点和 10.6 点)和 sPGA(两组均有 90.5%的患者达到“清除”或“几乎清除”)的相似模式支持了这一评估。在研究的第 50 周,所有治疗组的疗效均持续存在,包括从阿达木单抗转换为 AVT02 的患者,PASI 评分、生活质量评估和 sPGA 的改善百分比。第 16 周时,AVT02 和阿达木单抗的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性特征相似,在第 50 周时,转换组和继续治疗组也保持了这一特征。

结论

第 16 周和第 50 周时,AVT02 和阿达木单抗之间的疗效的客观和主观测量结果支持生物相似性评估,在转换组和继续治疗组中均有效。AVT02 安全且耐受良好,安全性和免疫原性特征与阿达木单抗相似,两者之间无临床意义的差异。

临床试验注册

EudraCT:2017-003367-35;ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03849404。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/6cc84c931480/40259_2021_502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/9d4a7b3c5515/40259_2021_502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/3729251377f2/40259_2021_502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/45a9766092ba/40259_2021_502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/6cc84c931480/40259_2021_502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/9d4a7b3c5515/40259_2021_502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/3729251377f2/40259_2021_502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/45a9766092ba/40259_2021_502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/8613172/6cc84c931480/40259_2021_502_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of AVT02 Versus Originator Adalimumab in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Active Control, Phase III Study.在中重度慢性斑块状银屑病患者中,AVT02 与阿达木单抗原研药的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行分组、阳性对照、III 期研究。
BioDrugs. 2021 Nov;35(6):735-748. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00502-w. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
2
Assessing the Interchangeability of AVT02 and Humira in Participants with Moderate‑to‑Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity Results from a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study.评估 AVT02 与修美乐在中重度慢性斑块状银屑病患者中的互换性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行分组研究的药代动力学、疗效、安全性和免疫原性结果。
BioDrugs. 2023 Jul;37(4):551-567. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00600-x. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Efficacy and Safety of HLX03, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.HLX03,一种阿达木单抗生物类似药,在中重度斑块状银屑病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、III 期研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01899-0. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Candidate Biosimilar CT-P43 Versus Originator Ustekinumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: 28-Week Results of a Randomised, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.候选生物类似药 CT-P43 与乌司奴单抗在中重度斑块状银屑病中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、活性对照、双盲、III 期研究的 28 周结果。
BioDrugs. 2024 Jan;38(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00630-5. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
AURIEL-PsO: a randomized, double-blind phase III equivalence trial to demonstrate the clinical similarity of the proposed biosimilar MSB11022 to reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.AURIEL-PsO:一项随机、双盲 III 期等效试验,旨在证明拟生物类似药 MSB11022 与阿达木单抗在中重度慢性斑块型银屑病患者中的临床相似性。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Feb;182(2):316-326. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18220. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial.利斯库珠单抗与阿达木单抗治疗中重度斑块型银屑病患者的疗效比较(IMMvent):一项随机、双盲、活性对照的 3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):576-586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30952-3. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
Phase III randomized study of the proposed adalimumab biosimilar GP2017 in psoriasis: impact of multiple switches.阿达木单抗生物类似药 GP2017 治疗银屑病的 III 期随机研究:多次换药的影响。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;179(3):623-631. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16890. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
8
A randomized, double-blind phase III study to demonstrate the clinical similarity of biosimilar SCT630 to reference adalimumab in Chinese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.一项随机、双盲、III 期研究,旨在证明 SCT630 生物类似药在中国中重度斑块状银屑病患者中的临床相似性与阿达木单抗参照药相当。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 Nov;112:109248. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109248. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
9
The totality of evidence approach in the development of AVT02 (adalimumab), a biosimilar to Humira.AVT02(阿达木单抗)的研发过程中采用的证据总体评估方法,AVT02是修美乐的生物类似药。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2024 Jan 19;15:20406223231223286. doi: 10.1177/20406223231223286. eCollection 2024.
10
Long-term data on the proposed adalimumab biosimilar BCD-057 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: A randomized controlled trial.在中重度银屑病患者中阿达木单抗生物类似药 BCD-057 的长期数据:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263214. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Biosimilars for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.用于治疗中度至重度慢性斑块状银屑病的生物类似药。
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025 Aug 18;15:401-410. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S510156. eCollection 2025.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub7.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Pediatric Psoriasis: A Multi-Center International Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States.美国免疫介导疾病患者使用无枸橼酸阿达木单抗和枸橼酸制剂的依从性和持续性差异评估。
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017.全球、地区和国家类风湿关节炎负担 1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;78(11):1463-1471. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215920. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
3
阿达木单抗生物类似药治疗儿童银屑病的有效性和安全性:一项多中心国际经验
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025 Jun 28;15:233-241. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S514115. eCollection 2025.
4
Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.生物类似药的创新制剂策略:聚焦无缓冲系统、安全性、监管一致性及知识产权挑战的趋势
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;18(6):908. doi: 10.3390/ph18060908.
5
Multiple Switches Between Adalimumab-fkjp and Reference Adalimumab in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Randomized Clinical Trial for Interchangeability.阿达木单抗-fkjp与参比阿达木单抗在中重度慢性斑块状银屑病中的多次转换:一项关于可互换性的多中心、双盲、平行组、随机临床试验
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03240-5.
6
Biologics for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.用于治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的生物制剂:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01423-0.
7
Switching from Adalimumab Reference Product to and Among Adalimumab Biosimilars Outside the USA: Insights for US Clinicians.在美国境外从阿达木单抗参比制剂转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药以及在不同阿达木单抗生物类似药之间的转换:给美国临床医生的见解
BioDrugs. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00719-z.
8
A Randomised, Double-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of the Biosimilar Ustekinumab FYB202 with Reference Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis.一项随机、双盲试验,比较生物类似药乌司奴单抗FYB202与参比乌司奴单抗在中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。
Adv Ther. 2025 May;42(5):2135-2149. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03138-2. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
9
Possibilities and Limitations in Substituting anti-Drug Antibody Titers with Signal-to-Noise Ratios: A Comprehensive Comparison Using Two Clinical Trial Datasets of Adalimumab.用信号噪声比替代抗药物抗体效价的可能性和局限性:阿达木单抗两项临床试验数据集的综合比较。
AAPS J. 2024 Nov 19;27(1):3. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00991-x.
10
Biosimilars in Dermatology Review.皮肤病学中的生物类似药综述。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024 Jan;9(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/24755303231212154. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.
生物制剂和生物类似药为何仍然如此昂贵:尽管生物类似药取得了两项胜利,但最高法院最近的裁决并未解决竞争的根本障碍。
Drugs. 2018 Nov;78(17):1777-1781. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0.
4
New adalimumab formulation associated with less injection site pain and improved motivation for treatment.新阿达木单抗制剂与较少的注射部位疼痛和改善治疗动机相关。
Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;29(6):949-953. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1520426. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Biosimilars: biologics that meet patients' needs and healthcare economics.生物类似药:满足患者需求并兼顾医疗保健经济学的生物制品。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep;22(13 Suppl):S439-S442.
6
Clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study.在治疗中重度斑块状银屑病患者中,生物类似药 ABP 501 与阿达木单抗的临床相似性:一项随机、双盲、多中心、III 期研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1093-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Mar 11.