• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂和生物类似药为何仍然如此昂贵:尽管生物类似药取得了两项胜利,但最高法院最近的裁决并未解决竞争的根本障碍。

Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.

机构信息

The Southern Network on Adverse Reaction (SONAR) Project, The South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, The South Carolina College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 915 Greene Street Suite 354, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

出版信息

Drugs. 2018 Nov;78(17):1777-1781. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0
PMID:30446980
Abstract

Biologics and biosimilars are medicines made from living cells that treat common and serious diseases such as cancer, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory diseases. They are highly targeted, efficacious, and represent an increasingly important part of physicians' armamentaria in the combat against these medical conditions. Yet they are extremely expensive, costing on average $10,000-$30,000 per year and exceed $500,000 for the most expensive biologics. The advent of biosimilar drugs, or high similar copies of biologics, was supposed to help reduce costs, but thus far the cost of treatment with biologics or biosimilars has not fallen sharply in the USA. We argue that a primary hurdle is the extent of patent protection for the reference biologics that impedes greater numbers of biosimilars entering into the market. To date, of the 12 biosimilars approved for marketing by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), only five are commercially available. All but one of the remaining biosimilars are withheld from commercialization due to patent disputes. We argue that the market for biologics and biosimilars will become price competitive only if more biosimilars are available to patients. To this end, the process to eliminate marginally inventive patents held by the reference drug makers must be streamlined and improved. In this perspective article, we suggest actions to improve the pre-FDA approval patent resolution process known as the patent dance, the streamlined patent invalidation process known as Inter Partes Reviews, and the process of granting patents.

摘要

生物制剂和生物类似药是利用活细胞制造的药物,用于治疗癌症、糖尿病、类风湿关节炎和其他炎症性疾病等常见和严重疾病。它们具有高度靶向性、疗效显著,是医生对抗这些疾病的武器库中越来越重要的一部分。然而,它们的价格极其昂贵,平均每年花费 1 万至 3 万美元,而最昂贵的生物制剂则超过 50 万美元。生物类似药(即生物制剂的高度相似副本)的出现本应有助于降低成本,但迄今为止,美国的生物制剂或生物类似药治疗费用并未大幅下降。我们认为,主要障碍是参考生物制剂的专利保护程度,这阻碍了更多的生物类似药进入市场。迄今为止,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准上市的 12 种生物类似药中,只有 5 种有商业销售。由于专利纠纷,其余生物类似药中除一种外均未获准商业化。我们认为,只有当更多的生物类似药可供患者使用,生物制剂和生物类似药市场才会具有价格竞争力。为此,必须简化和改进参考药物制造商持有的非实质性发明专利的淘汰流程。在这篇观点文章中,我们提出了一些行动建议,以改进称为专利舞蹈的 FDA 批准前专利解决程序、称为专利无效化程序的简化专利无效程序,以及专利授予程序。

相似文献

1
Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.生物制剂和生物类似药为何仍然如此昂贵:尽管生物类似药取得了两项胜利,但最高法院最近的裁决并未解决竞争的根本障碍。
Drugs. 2018 Nov;78(17):1777-1781. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0.
2
Biosimilars: biologics that meet patients' needs and healthcare economics.生物类似药:满足患者需求并兼顾医疗保健经济学的生物制品。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep;22(13 Suppl):S439-S442.
3
Why Are Biosimilars Not Living up to Their Promise in the US?生物类似药在美国为何未能兑现其承诺?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):E668-678. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.668.
4
Optimizing use and addressing challenges to uptake of biosimilars.优化生物类似药的使用并解决其采用面临的挑战。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(21 Suppl):S457-S461.
5
Competition Between Biosimilars and Patented Biologics: Learning from European and Japanese Experience.生物类似药与专利生物药之间的竞争:借鉴欧洲和日本的经验
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Nov;34(11):1173-1186. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0428-6.
6
Identifying Key Benefits in European Off-Patent Biologics and Biosimilar Markets: It is Not Only About Price!识别欧洲非专利生物制品和生物类似药市场的关键优势:不仅仅是价格!
BioDrugs. 2020 Apr;34(2):159-170. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00395-w.
7
A GUIDE TO FOLLOW-ON BIOLOGICS AND BIOSIMILARS WITH A FOCUS ON INSULIN.《后续生物制品和生物类似药指南:重点关注胰岛素》
Endocr Pract. 2018 Feb;24(2):195-204. doi: 10.4158/EP161728.RA.
8
Biosimilars in the United States: Emerging Issues in Litigation.美国的生物类似药:诉讼中的新问题。
BioDrugs. 2017 Jun;31(3):189-205. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0216-7.
9
The constitutional protection of trade secrets and patents under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009.2009年《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》对商业秘密和专利的宪法保护。
Food Drug Law J. 2011;66(3):285-328.
10
Are biosimilars patentable?生物类似药可获专利吗?
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2016 Aug;26(8):871-5. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2016.1193156. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.欧洲生物制药的引入:早期扩散模式与数据可用性的横断面研究
BioDrugs. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2.
2
Integration of Bayesian optimization and solution thermodynamics to optimize media design for mammalian biomanufacturing.整合贝叶斯优化与溶液热力学以优化哺乳动物生物制造的培养基设计。
iScience. 2025 Jul 3;28(8):112944. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112944. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
3
Exploratory Data Analysis of the In Vitro Effects of Novel Hydrazide-Hydrazone Antioxidants in the Context of In Silico Predictors.

本文引用的文献

1
Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential.美国生物类似药的成本节约:初步经验与未来潜力
Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):3. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Friction in the Path to Use of Biosimilar Drugs.生物类似药使用之路上的阻碍
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1805092.
3
Friction in the Path to Use of Biosimilar Drugs.生物类似药使用之路上的阻碍
在计算机预测背景下新型酰肼-腙类抗氧化剂体外效应的探索性数据分析
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 May 8;14(5):566. doi: 10.3390/antiox14050566.
4
Biosimilars in Dermatology Review.皮肤病学中的生物类似药综述。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024 Jan;9(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/24755303231212154. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
Drug Design for Alzheimer's Disease: Biologics . Small Molecules.治疗阿尔茨海默病的药物设计:生物制剂和小分子药物。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2024;20(12):821-826. doi: 10.2174/0115672050301583240307114452.
6
Downregulation of Caveolae-Associated Proteins in Psoriasis: A Case Series Study.银屑病中小窝相关蛋白的下调:一项病例系列研究。
JID Innov. 2024 Feb 1;4(2):100265. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100265. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Reduced economic disparity in biologics use for psoriasis after introducing the reducing copayment program.引入降低自付费用计划后,银屑病生物制剂使用方面的经济差距有所缩小。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54447-5.
8
Delivery of biologics: Topical administration.生物制剂的传递:局部给药。
Biomaterials. 2023 Nov;302:122312. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122312. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
9
Real-world evidence in the use of Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration (ArMD): a scoping review.贝伐单抗用于年龄相关性黄斑变性(ArMD)的真实世界证据:一项范围综述。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec;43(12):4527-4539. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02853-5. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
10
Efficacy and safety of oral roflumilast for moderate-to-severe psoriasis-a randomized controlled trial (PSORRO).口服罗氟司特治疗中重度银屑病的疗效和安全性——一项随机对照试验(PSORRO)
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Apr 21;30:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100639. eCollection 2023 Jul.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):791-793. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714908.
4
Challenges to Biosimilar Substitution.生物类似药替代面临的挑战。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 26;318(12):1186. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11930.
5
Biosimilars-Curb Your Enthusiasm.生物类似药——抑制你的热情。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1467-1468. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1530.
6
Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.生物类似肿瘤药物的监管与临床考量
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Dec;15(13):e594-e605. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70365-1. Epub 2014 Nov 24.