Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Department of Pathology, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, P.R. China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15330338211045826. doi: 10.1177/15330338211045826.
Tumor budding (TB), tumor stroma ratio (TSR), tumor infiltrating pattern (TIP), and preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were previously reported to be useful prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the correlation among these markers and their individual prognostic potency have not been extensively studied. A cohort of 147 stage I-IV CRC patients was obtained retrospectively, and the patients were divided into subgroups based on low or high TB/TSR/LMR, TIPa (expansile + intermediate) and TIPb (infiltrative) values. The differences in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) intervals among these subgroups were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis followed by log-rank tests. The Cox proportional hazard model was applied for the univariate and multivariate analysis of RFS and OS rates. TB, TIP, and LMR, but not TSR, are useful markers for predicting patient survival. Patients with a poor histological grade and large tumor diameter were more likely to present with high TB, TIPb, and low LMR values; in addition, those with advanced T, N, and TNM stages and elevated preoperative CA199 levels had high TB and TIPb levels. TB, TIP, and LMR were significant prognostic factors for the RFS (TB: HR [hazard ratio] = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.30-4.00, < .01; TIP: HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.46-4.60, < .01; LMR: HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.96, = .02) and OS (TB: HR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.32-4.48, < .01; TIP: HR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.34-4.63, < .01; LMR: HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.98, = .03) intervals. In addition, TB and LMR were independent prognostic factors for the RFS interval (TB: HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.01-3.19, = .05; LMR: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.96, = .01), but only LMR was an independent factor for OS rates (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.98, = .03). Although TB, TIP, and LMR are useful prognostic markers for CRC, the LMR is likely to be the only independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS outcomes in practice.
肿瘤芽(TB)、肿瘤基质比(TSR)、肿瘤浸润模式(TIP)和术前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比(LMR)先前被报道为结直肠癌(CRC)的有用预后因素;然而,这些标志物之间的相关性及其各自的预后效力尚未得到广泛研究。我们回顾性地获得了 147 例 I-IV 期 CRC 患者的队列,并根据低或高 TB/TSR/LMR、TIPa(扩张+中间)和 TIPb(浸润)值将患者分为亚组。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验确定这些亚组之间无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)间隔的差异。应用 Cox 比例风险模型进行 RFS 和 OS 率的单因素和多因素分析。TB、TIP 和 LMR 而不是 TSR 是预测患者生存的有用标志物。组织学分级差和肿瘤直径大的患者更有可能出现高 TB、TIPb 和低 LMR 值;此外,那些具有晚期 T、N 和 TNM 分期和升高的术前 CA199 水平的患者具有高 TB 和 TIPb 水平。TB、TIP 和 LMR 是 RFS(TB:HR [风险比] = 2.28,95%CI = 1.30-4.00, < .01;TIP:HR = 2.60,95%CI = 1.46-4.60, < .01;LMR:HR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.65-0.96, = .02)和 OS(TB:HR = 2.43,95%CI = 1.32-4.48, < .01;TIP:HR = 2.49,95%CI = 1.34-4.63, < .01;LMR:HR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.64-0.98, = .03)间隔的重要预后因素。此外,TB 和 LMR 是 RFS 间隔的独立预后因素(TB:HR = 1.80,95%CI = 1.01-3.19, = .05;LMR:HR = 0.80,95%CI = 0.67-0.96, = .01),但只有 LMR 是 OS 率的独立因素(HR = 0.80,95%CI = 0.65-0.98, = .03)。虽然 TB、TIP 和 LMR 是 CRC 的有用预后标志物,但 LMR 可能是 RFS 和 OS 结果的唯一独立预后因素。