Bınbay Tolga, Ergül Ceylan, van Os Jim
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Sep 20;58(Suppl 1):S3-S6. doi: 10.29399/npa.27701. eCollection 2021.
In this review, a historical and conceptual panorama of symptomatic remission will be provided with a focus on the whole clinical psychosis beyond schizophrenia.
We included all published articles on remission in psychosis, without any restrictions regarding language or year. We used a string to detect relevant articles in PubMed. We reviewed the abstracts to exclude out of scope results. Then, we evaluated the remaining articles to extract data. Variables included year of publication, language of publication, country of origin, type of article, main topic of research, main disorder studied, and reference to remission criteria.
The final dataset included 439 citations which dates back to 1950. The Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) criteria which was proposed in 2005 had a major effect on remission research in schizophrenia. The RSWG criteria changed the yearly published numbers of research, the main land of remission research and the scope of the articles. After 2005, the number of publications rapidly increased, and English became the primary language of the articles. Beyond prominent clinical effect, the criteria did have little impact on functional remission in schizophrenia. And also research in the last decade provided very few information about remission in other clinical aspects of psychosis spectrum including acute, transient and chronic forms. Furthermore, although there has been a conceptual unity in the last decade the heterogeneity of the studies is still far from decreasing, which still blurs the efforts to evaluate remission in psychosis.
Although studies on remission in schizophrenia started in the 1950s, the criteria published in 2005 changed the whole area. However, remission discussions are not yet valid for psychotic diagnoses other than schizophrenia and are limited.
在本综述中,将呈现症状缓解的历史和概念全景,重点关注精神分裂症以外的整个临床精神病学领域。
我们纳入了所有已发表的关于精神病缓解的文章,对语言和年份没有任何限制。我们使用检索词在PubMed中检索相关文章。我们浏览摘要以排除范围不符的结果。然后,我们评估其余文章以提取数据。变量包括发表年份、发表语言、原产国、文章类型、主要研究主题、所研究的主要疾病以及对缓解标准的提及。
最终数据集包括439条可追溯到1950年的引用文献。2005年提出的精神分裂症缓解工作组(RSWG)标准对精神分裂症缓解研究产生了重大影响。RSWG标准改变了每年发表的研究数量、缓解研究的主要地区以及文章的范围。2005年后,出版物数量迅速增加,英语成为文章的主要语言。除了显著的临床效果外,该标准对精神分裂症的功能缓解影响甚微。而且过去十年的研究在精神病谱系的其他临床方面,包括急性、短暂性和慢性形式的缓解方面提供的信息很少。此外,尽管在过去十年中存在概念上的统一,但研究的异质性仍远未降低,这仍然模糊了评估精神病缓解的努力。
尽管关于精神分裂症缓解的研究始于20世纪50年代,但2005年发表的标准改变了整个领域。然而,缓解讨论对于精神分裂症以外的精神病诊断仍然无效且有限。