Fraser Tamieka A, Martin Alynn, Polkinghorne Adam, Carver Scott
School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, 7001, TAS, Australia; Centre for Animal Health Innovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 91 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, 4556, QLD, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, 7001, TAS, Australia.
Vet Parasitol. 2018 Feb 15;251:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Sarcoptic mange is a globally significant parasitic disease of humans and other animals, both domestic and wild. But clinical diagnosis of S. scabiei infestation, using the standard skin scraping followed by microscopy technique, remains highly variable (predominantly due to false-negatives), and a major challenge for human and animal welfare. Here, we utilised a unique sample set from bare-nosed wombats (Vombatus ursinus) to evaluate a variety of putatively useful diagnostic approaches for S. scabiei. Against the standard of skin scrapings followed by microscopy, we compared observational scoring of mange severity (often employed in field studies of wildlife), PCR on skin scrapings (recently proposed as an improvement for humans and other animals), and PCR on skin swabs (proposed a non-invasive method for humans and other animals). We find that observational scoring positively correlated with counts of S. scabiei from skin scrapings, particularly as mange severity increases, but underdiagnoses early mange. Species-specific PCR for S. scabiei on skin scrapings had enhanced capacity for mite detection relative to microscopy. Finally, the non-invasive sampling method of PCR on skin swab samples had a high congruence to skin scraping microscopy, however prospective false negatives as a consequence to sampling is concerning. To our knowledge, this is the first study to simultaneously assess this combination of methods for S. scabiei diagnosis. We conclude that PCR on skin scrapings as an advancement on traditional microscopy, and the other techniques (observational, skin swabs and microscopy) remain useful, but harbour greater false-negatives. Outcomes are transferrable to diagnosis of S. scabiei for other host species, including humans, particularly for crusted mange and potentially ordinary mange also.
疥螨病是一种在全球范围内对人类以及家养和野生动物都具有重要意义的寄生虫病。但是,使用标准的皮肤刮片然后进行显微镜检查技术对疥螨感染进行临床诊断,其结果仍然高度可变(主要是由于假阴性),这对人类和动物福利构成了重大挑战。在此,我们利用了来自袋熊(袋熊属)的独特样本集,以评估多种可能对疥螨有用的诊断方法。与标准的皮肤刮片后显微镜检查相比,我们比较了疥螨严重程度的观察评分(常用于野生动物的野外研究)、皮肤刮片的聚合酶链反应(PCR)(最近被提议作为对人类和其他动物诊断方法的改进)以及皮肤拭子的PCR(被提议作为一种对人类和其他动物的非侵入性方法)。我们发现,观察评分与皮肤刮片中疥螨的计数呈正相关,特别是随着疥螨严重程度的增加,但会漏诊早期疥螨病。相对于显微镜检查,针对皮肤刮片进行的疥螨特异性PCR在检测螨虫方面具有更强的能力。最后,皮肤拭子样本的PCR非侵入性采样方法与皮肤刮片显微镜检查具有高度一致性,然而,由于采样导致的潜在假阴性令人担忧。据我们所知,这是第一项同时评估这组用于疥螨诊断方法的研究。我们得出结论,皮肤刮片的PCR作为对传统显微镜检查的改进,以及其他技术(观察评分、皮肤拭子和显微镜检查)仍然有用,但存在更多假阴性。这些结果可用于其他宿主物种,包括人类的疥螨诊断,特别是对于结痂性疥螨病,可能对普通疥螨病也适用。