Lozada-Martínez Ivan David, Acevedo-Aguilar Laura Marcela, Mass-Hernández Laura Marcela, Matta-Rodríguez Duván, Jiménez-Filigrana Jhoyner Alberto, Garzón-Gutiérrez Karen Elizabeth, Barahona-Botache Sergio Antonio, Vásquez-Castañeda Danna Lianeth, Caicedo-Giraldo Sharon Del Rosario, Rahman Sabrina
Medical and Surgical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
School of Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 9;71:102932. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102932. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Currently, the adaptation of scientific evidence in clinical problem solving is based on the evidence-based medicine method. Medical students and health professionals should have an adequate knowledge of this method and thus provide adequate health care and increasingly provide high quality scientific publications that can be subsequently integrated in different clinical scenarios. Several scales and tools have been proposed as guides to recognize the different levels of quality of the available evidence, their degrees of recommendation and the biases and fallacies that may occur both in the clinical and research areas, with the aim of identifying the best available evidence. However, few students and professionals are aware of them and make proper use of them. Therefore, it is necessary to synthesize these tools in an understandable and practical way.
目前，临床问题解决中科学证据的应用基于循证医学方法。医学生和卫生专业人员应充分了解此方法，从而提供充分的医疗保健，并越来越多地提供高质量的科学出版物，这些出版物随后可整合到不同的临床场景中。已经提出了几种量表和工具作为指南，以识别现有证据的不同质量水平、推荐程度以及临床和研究领域可能出现的偏差和谬误，目的是确定最佳可用证据。然而，很少有学生和专业人员了解并正确使用它们。因此，有必要以一种易懂且实用的方式综合这些工具。
