Suppr超能文献

氟康唑在极早产儿中的预防性应用。

Prophylactic Use of Fluconazole in Very Premature Infants.

作者信息

Zhang Deshuang, Xie Dongke, He Na, Wang Xiaoling, Dong Wenbin, Lei Xiaoping

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2021 Oct 1;9:726769. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.726769. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and fungal sensitivity of prophylactic fluconazole use in very premature infants. We performed a retrospective historical comparative analysis of 196 very premature infants (113 in the prophylaxis group and 83 in the rescue group). The incidence of nosocomial fungal infection (NCFI) and pathogenic fungi, their drug sensitivity, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluconazole were compared between the two groups. We also analyzed differences in short-term adverse outcomes, such as drug-induced liver or renal function disruption, fungal-attributable death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), between the groups. The effects of the prophylactic fluconazole strategy on NCFI and short-term adverse outcomes were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. (46.7%) and (43.3%) were the main culprit pathogens causing NCFI. The incidence of NCFI was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group than in the rescue group (15.9 vs. 45.8%, < 0.001). However, fewer fungi were completely sensitive to fluconazole (40 vs. 85%, < 0.05) and the MIC of fluconazole was higher [16.0 (3.5 ~ 16.0) vs. 3.0 (1.0 ~ 8.0) μg/ml, < 0.001] in the prophylaxis group than in the rescue group. Compared with the rescue group, the prophylaxis group had a lower risk of NCFI (adjusted OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.11, 0.55). Additionally, the prophylaxis group had significantly lower risks of combined outcomes (one or more complications, such as BPD, ROP needing interventions, PVL/IVH (grade > 2), NEC stage ≥2, and fungal-attributable death) (adjusted OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21, 0.92). There was no significant difference in serum alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), creatinine (Cr), or direct bilirubin (DBIL) levels between the two groups. Fluconazole prophylaxis reduced NCFI and improved combined clinical outcomes in very premature infants, with no increased risks of serious short-term adverse side effects; however, the MIC of fluconazole showed significant increases. Therefore, further optimization of preventive strategies is necessary to maintain the sensitivity of fluconazole against fungal isolates.

摘要

评估预防性使用氟康唑对极早产儿的疗效、安全性及真菌敏感性。我们对196例极早产儿进行了回顾性历史对照分析(预防组113例,挽救组83例)。比较了两组医院获得性真菌感染(NCFI)的发生率、致病真菌、其药物敏感性及氟康唑的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。我们还分析了两组短期不良结局的差异,如药物性肝或肾功能损害、真菌所致死亡、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)、早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)、脑室周围白质软化(PVL)、脑室内出血(IVH)和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)。通过多因素logistic回归评估预防性氟康唑策略对NCFI和短期不良结局的影响。(46.7%)和(43.3%)是导致NCFI的主要病原菌。预防组的NCFI发生率显著低于挽救组(15.9%对45.8%,<0.001)。然而,预防组对氟康唑完全敏感的真菌较少(40%对85%,<0.05),且氟康唑的MIC较高[16.0(3.516.0)对3.0(1.08.0)μg/ml,<0.001]。与挽救组相比,预防组发生NCFI的风险较低(调整后的OR为0.25;95%CI为0.11,0.55)。此外,预防组发生联合结局(一种或多种并发症,如BPD、需要干预的ROP、PVL/IVH(>2级)、NEC≥2期和真菌所致死亡)的风险显著较低(调整后的OR为0.44;95%CI为0.21,0.92)。两组血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、肌酐(Cr)或直接胆红素(DBIL)水平无显著差异。预防性使用氟康唑可降低极早产儿的NCFI并改善联合临床结局,且不会增加严重短期不良副作用的风险;然而,氟康唑的MIC显著升高。因此,有必要进一步优化预防策略以维持氟康唑对真菌分离株的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/8517516/6a944cd7a48e/fped-09-726769-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验