Shen Min, Huang Jinke, Qiu Tao
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 30;8:732144. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.732144. eCollection 2021.
To systematically appraise and synthesize evidence, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on acupuncture for stable angina pectoris (SAP). Eight databases were searched for SRs/MAs of acupuncture on SAP. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality were evaluated by Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, respectively. A total of seven published SRs/MAs met the inclusion criteria. According to the evaluation results of AMSTAR-2, two studies were considered as of moderate quality; the remaining five were considered as of very low quality. According to the evaluation results of the PRISMA checklist, only one study reported the checklist in its entirety, while others had reporting deficiencies. According to GRADE, a total of 18 outcome indicators extracted from the included studies were evaluated. The evidence quality was very low in three, low in three, moderate in eight, and high in four. Acupuncture may be beneficial for SAP from the currently published evidence. However, this conclusion must be interpreted cautiously due to the generally low methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies. More rigorous, more standardized and comprehensive SRs/MAs are needed to provide strong evidence for convincing conclusions.
为了系统地评估和综合证据,我们对关于针刺治疗稳定型心绞痛(SAP)的系统评价/荟萃分析(SRs/MAs)进行了概述。检索了八个数据库以查找关于针刺治疗SAP的SRs/MAs。分别通过系统评价方法学质量评估2(AMSTAR-2)、系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单以及推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)系统来评估方法学质量、报告质量和证据质量。共有七篇已发表的SRs/MAs符合纳入标准。根据AMSTAR-2的评估结果,两项研究被认为质量中等;其余五项被认为质量极低。根据PRISMA清单的评估结果,只有一项研究完整报告了该清单,而其他研究存在报告缺陷。根据GRADE,对从纳入研究中提取的总共18个结局指标进行了评估。证据质量在三项中极低,三项中低,八项中中等,四项中高。从目前已发表的证据来看,针刺可能对SAP有益。然而,由于纳入研究的方法学质量、报告质量和证据质量普遍较低,这一结论必须谨慎解读。需要更严格、更标准化和全面的SRs/MAs来为令人信服的结论提供有力证据。