Scott E Marian, Davies Vinny, Nolan Andrea M, Noble Cory E, Dowgray Nathalie J, German Alexander J, Wiseman-Orr M Lesley, Reid Jacqueline
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 30;8:733812. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.733812. eCollection 2021.
Validity is not an inherent property of a measurement scale and so evidence for validity relating to its use for particular purposes, with defined populations and in specified contexts must be accumulated. We have published the development of a web-based, generic health-related quality of life instrument (VetMetrica™) to measure the affective impact of chronic disease in cats and provided evidence for its validity in a mixed population of cats, some of which, according to veterinary judgement, were healthy and others of which were suffering from chronic conditions likely to affect their quality of life, often with multiple co-morbidities present. The first aim of the current study was to demonstrate the construct validity of the VetMetrica™ generic instrument when used with cats suffering from osteoarthritis, by testing the hypothesis that the health-related quality of life profile of cats with different severities of osteoarthritis would differ and by demonstrating convergent validity between the health-related quality of life profile scores and independently quantified vet-assessed pain and quality of life impact scores. The latter involved simple correlation analysis and investigation of the relationship between health-related quality of life domain scores and vet-assessed scores, when adjusted for other potential explanatory variables including number of comorbidities and age. Responsiveness-the ability to detect clinically relevant change-is an essential quality for an evaluative instrument and it also provides evidence for "longitudinal validity". Therefore, a second aim of this study was to demonstrate that changes in health-related quality of life domain scores concurred with the clinician's impression of change over time in the health status of cats with osteoarthritis, thus providing evidence for the instrument's responsiveness. Previously, we have reported disagreement between owner and vet impression as to health status in cats in general, but not in relation to any specific disease. Accordingly, the third study aim was to investigate the extent of agreement or disagreement between owner impression of the impact of osteoarthritis on their cats' quality of life and vet impression of such impact. Fifty one percentage of cat owners believed their cats to be perfectly healthy despite a clinician diagnosis of osteoarthritis.
效度并非测量工具的固有属性,因此必须积累有关其在特定目的、特定人群和特定背景下使用的效度证据。我们已发表了一种基于网络的通用健康相关生活质量工具(VetMetrica™)的开发情况,该工具用于测量猫慢性疾病的情感影响,并在猫的混合群体中提供了其效度证据,根据兽医判断,其中一些猫健康,另一些患有可能影响其生活质量的慢性疾病,且常常存在多种合并症。本研究的首要目的是,通过检验不同严重程度骨关节炎猫的健康相关生活质量概况会有所不同这一假设,并通过证明健康相关生活质量概况得分与独立量化的兽医评估疼痛及生活质量影响得分之间的收敛效度,来证明VetMetrica™通用工具在用于患有骨关节炎的猫时的结构效度。后者涉及简单的相关性分析以及在调整包括合并症数量和年龄等其他潜在解释变量后,对健康相关生活质量领域得分与兽医评估得分之间关系的调查。反应性——检测临床相关变化的能力——是评估工具的一项基本特性,它也为“纵向效度”提供证据。因此,本研究的第二个目的是证明健康相关生活质量领域得分的变化与临床医生对患有骨关节炎猫的健康状况随时间变化的印象一致,从而为该工具的反应性提供证据。此前,我们曾报道过一般情况下猫主人和兽医对猫健康状况的印象存在分歧,但与任何特定疾病无关。因此,本研究的第三个目的是调查猫主人对骨关节炎对其猫生活质量影响的印象与兽医对此影响的印象之间的一致或分歧程度。尽管临床医生诊断猫患有骨关节炎,但51%的猫主人认为他们的猫非常健康。