• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳酸钠输注与二氧化碳吸入惊恐激发试验比较的 Meta 分析。

Comparison of Sodium Lactate Infusion and Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Panic Provocation Tests: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Clinical Research Division, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, USA.

Psychiatry Department, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 2022 Mar;55(2):87-94. doi: 10.1055/a-1589-6049. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1055/a-1589-6049
PMID:34666404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium lactate (NaL) infusion and carbon dioxide (CO) inhalation are proven to provoke acute panic attacks (PAs) in patients with panic disorder (PD). A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to compare the effect sizes of these methods.

METHODS

Odds ratios were calculated for each of the original studies and were pooled using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Either NaL or CO provocations significantly increased the rates of PAs in individuals with PD compared to those in healthy controls. However, the effect size of NaL infusion (=25.13, =15.48-40.80) was significantly greater than that of CO inhalation (=10.58, =7.88-14.21).

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the efficacy of the two panic provocation tests is very strong. Yet, the results support the superiority of NaL infusion over CO inhalation challenge as a panic provocation test. Thus, lactate seems a much stronger stimulus than CO for the brain suffocation detector.

摘要

背景

乳酸钠(NaL)输注和二氧化碳(CO)吸入已被证明可诱发惊恐障碍(PD)患者的急性惊恐发作(PA)。进行了系统的文献检索和荟萃分析,以比较这些方法的效果大小。

方法

对每项原始研究计算了优势比,并使用随机效应模型进行了汇总。

结果

与健康对照组相比,NaL 或 CO 激发均显著增加了 PD 个体中 PA 的发生率。然而,乳酸钠输注的效应大小(=25.13,=15.48-40.80)明显大于 CO 吸入的效应大小(=10.58,=7.88-14.21)。

结论

两种惊恐诱发测试的疗效证据非常强。然而,结果支持乳酸钠输注优于 CO 吸入挑战作为惊恐诱发测试。因此,与 CO 相比,乳酸似乎是大脑窒息探测器更强的刺激物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sodium Lactate Infusion and Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Panic Provocation Tests: A Meta-analysis.乳酸钠输注与二氧化碳吸入惊恐激发试验比较的 Meta 分析。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2022 Mar;55(2):87-94. doi: 10.1055/a-1589-6049. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of carbon dioxide provocation in psychiatric disorders.二氧化碳激发在精神障碍中的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Nov;143:508-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.032. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Diagnostic Utility of Sodium Lactate Infusion and CO2-35% Inhalation for Panic Disorder.静脉乳酸钠输注和 CO2-35% 吸入对惊恐障碍的诊断效用。
Neuropsychobiology. 2019;78(2):59-69. doi: 10.1159/000499136. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
[A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Inhalation as a Challenge Test in Panic Disorder].[二氧化碳吸入作为惊恐障碍激发试验的疗效的荟萃分析]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Summer;30(2):99-108.
5
CO2 provocation of panic: symptomatic and manometric evaluation in patients with noncardiac chest pain.二氧化碳诱发惊恐:非心源性胸痛患者的症状及测压评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 May;92(5):839-42.
6
An analysis of panic symptoms during hypercarbia compared to hypocarbia in patients with panic attacks.惊恐障碍患者高碳酸血症与低碳酸血症时惊恐症状的分析。
J Affect Disord. 1991 Nov;23(3):131-6. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(91)90025-n.
7
Carbon dioxide test as an additional clinical measure of treatment response in panic disorder.二氧化碳测试作为惊恐障碍治疗反应的一项额外临床指标。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002 Jun;60(2-B):358-61. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2002000300003.
8
Neurobiology of panic and pH chemosensation in the brain.大脑中恐慌与pH化学感觉的神经生物学
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(4):475-83. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.4/jwemmie.
9
Prospective evaluation of panic potentiation following 35% CO2 challenge in nonclinical subjects.非临床受试者中35%二氧化碳激发后惊恐增强的前瞻性评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;153(6):823-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.6.823.
10
The carbon dioxide challenge test in panic disorder: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical research.惊恐障碍中的二氧化碳挑战试验:临床前和临床研究的系统评价。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Sep;35(3):318-31. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1045.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic reprogramming of astrocytes: Emerging roles of lactate.星形胶质细胞的代谢重编程:乳酸的新作用
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Feb 1;21(2):421-432. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00776. Epub 2024 Dec 16.