Suppr超能文献

超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞中,神经周围注射与静脉注射地塞米松作为左旋布比卡因辅助剂的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验

Comparison of Perineural and Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A prospective Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Veena G, Pangotra Anshu, Kumar Shailesh, Prakash Jay, Rao Natesh S, Priye Shio

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Superspeciality Anaesthesia, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;15(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_69_21. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of perineural versus intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone (4 mg) when added to levobupivacaine as an adjuvant has not been well studied.

AIMS

This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of perineural and i.v. dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus (ICBP) block.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted on 68 patients with the ultrasound-guided ICBP block, randomly allocated into two groups (34 each). Four patients had failed block (2 in each group) that was excluded from the study. Group A received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 1 mL of normal saline for the block and i.v. dexamethasone 4 mg. Group B received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% with 4 mg of perineural dexamethasone for the block. Postoperative vitals and different block characteristics were assessed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Student's independent sample -test and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The duration of motor block and analgesia in Group A was 1245.94 ± 153.22 min and 1310.16 ± 151.68 min, respectively. However, in Group B, the duration of motor block and analgesia was 1768.13 ± 309.86 min and 1743.59 ± 231.39 min, respectively, which was more when compared to Group A ( < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score of ≥3 in Group A was 37% and in Group B was 9% ( = 0.008). Four cases had delayed regression of motor block in the perineural group.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the duration of motor block promoted by levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period when compared with the intravenous dexamethasone.

摘要

背景

将地塞米松(4毫克)经神经周围注射与静脉注射作为左布比卡因的佐剂时,其效果尚未得到充分研究。

目的

本研究旨在比较经神经周围注射和静脉注射地塞米松作为左布比卡因佐剂用于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞(ICBP)时的镇痛效果。

设置与设计

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

材料与方法

本研究纳入68例行超声引导下ICBP阻滞的患者,随机分为两组(每组34例)。4例阻滞失败患者(每组2例)被排除在研究之外。A组接受25毫升0.5%左布比卡因和1毫升生理盐水用于阻滞,并静脉注射4毫克地塞米松。B组接受25毫升0.5%左布比卡因加4毫克经神经周围注射的地塞米松用于阻滞。评估术后生命体征和不同的阻滞特征。

所用统计分析方法

采用学生独立样本t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

A组运动阻滞和镇痛持续时间分别为1245.94±153.22分钟和1310.16±151.68分钟。然而,B组运动阻滞和镇痛持续时间分别为1768.13±309.86分钟和1743.59±231.39分钟,与A组相比更长(P<0.001)。A组视觉模拟评分≥3分的比例为37%,B组为9%(P=0.008)。经神经周围注射组有4例运动阻滞消退延迟。

结论

与静脉注射地塞米松相比,经神经周围注射地塞米松显著延长了锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞中左布比卡因促进的运动阻滞持续时间,降低了术后疼痛强度和补救性镇痛需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8462415/1762142e2f37/AER-15-45-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验