Suppr超能文献

社区面罩和外科口罩限制气溶胶传播的效率

Efficiency of Community Face Coverings and Surgical Masks to Limit the Spread of Aerosol.

作者信息

Chazelet Sandrine, Pacault Stephanie

机构信息

National Institute for Research and Safety, Process Engineering Department, 1, rue du Morvan - CS 60027 - 54519 Vandoeuvre Cedex, France.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Apr 22;66(4):495-509. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab089.

Abstract

In the current pandemic context of COVID-19, people wear different types of masks, particularly in their workplace, to limit the spread of the virus. Depending on their activity and work environment, employees are required to wear community face coverings, cloth masks with a transparent windows, surgical masks, reusable masks, or respirators. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency as source control of these masks, i.e., when worn to protect the environment from the spread of particles emitted by the wearer. An experimental test bench including a dummy head and a breathing simulator associated with a DEHS droplet generator emitting 1 or 3 µm particles in the exhaled stream is used. Source control efficiency is calculated from the total flux of particles emitted in the test section without and with a mask. Seventeen models of masks are tested. Three breathing rate conditions were studied: from rest to heavy breathing, with average rates of 13, 27, and 45 L/min. Source control efficiencies vary from one mask to another. Among community face coverings (seven models) the values ranged from 15.6 to 33.8% for a medium intensity breath. The efficiencies of surgical masks (three models) ranged from 17.4 to 28.3% for the same breathing cycle. The community face coverings and the disposable surgical masks present equivalent values of source control efficiency, respectively, 25.9 and 24.1% at 1 µm and 31.5 and 23.2% at 3 µm. The respirators show higher source control efficiency than the other types of masks (76.7% at 1 µm and 82.5% at 3 µm). The statistical analysis of the data shows no effect of the breathing flow rate and an interaction effect between mask type and particle size. No differences in source control were found for the two particle sizes or the different experimental breathing rates for the respirators and the surgical masks. But the community face coverings and the cloth masks with transparent window present a source control efficiency which increases with the particle size. Varying levels of efficiency were measured with higher source control for respirators than for other types of masks. In the context of a respiratory protection programme, they can provide an effective barrier to the spread of the virus. But these results show also that no mask can stop all the particles emitted by its wearer. Regardless of the type of mask, other barrier measures (ventilation, social distancing, and hygiene) are then necessary.

摘要

在当前新冠疫情背景下,人们佩戴不同类型的口罩,尤其是在工作场所,以限制病毒传播。根据其活动和工作环境,员工被要求佩戴社区面罩、带有透明窗的布口罩、医用口罩、可重复使用口罩或呼吸器。本研究的目的是评估这些口罩作为源头控制的效率,即当佩戴口罩以保护环境免受佩戴者呼出颗粒传播影响时的效率。使用了一个实验测试台,包括一个假人头和一个与DEHS液滴发生器相连的呼吸模拟器,该发生器在呼出气流中产生1或3微米的颗粒。源头控制效率是根据测试段在不戴口罩和戴口罩情况下排放的颗粒总通量计算得出的。测试了17种口罩型号。研究了三种呼吸速率条件:从静息到剧烈呼吸,平均速率分别为13、27和45升/分钟。不同口罩的源头控制效率各不相同。在社区面罩(七种型号)中,中等强度呼吸时的效率值在15.6%至33.8%之间。对于相同的呼吸周期,医用口罩(三种型号)的效率在17.4%至

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验