• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“中枢敏化量表和疼痛敏感性实验测试的会聚效度”。

"Convergent validity of the central sensitization inventory and experimental testing of pain sensitivity".

机构信息

Medical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2021 Oct 19;22(3):597-613. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0090. Print 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2021-0090
PMID:34668367
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to examine the convergent validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory by quantifying the correlation with experimental measures of pain sensitivity and self-reported psycho-social questionnaires, in a low back pain population.

METHODS

All participants were recruited from an outpatient hospital spine care clinic (Spine Centre of Southern Denmark). Participants underwent a standardized experimental pain test protocol and completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) along with additional self-reported questionnaires to assess psycho-social constructs across different domains. The association between the CSI, experimental pain measures and other self-reported psycho-social questionnaires were analyzed using correlation and contingency tests. ROC-curve analysis was used to determine sensitivity and specificity for CSI.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight (168) participants were included. The CSI was weakly correlated with nine out of 20 variables in the experimental pain test protocol (rho range -0.37 to 0.22). The CSI was more closely correlated with psycho-social factors such as work ability, disability, and symptoms of exhaustion disorder. ROC-analysis identified an optimal cut-point of 44 on CSI (Sn=39.1% Sp=87.4%). The CSI had an area under the ROC curve of 0.656. Fisher's exact test demonstrated a statistically significant association between participants scoring ≥40 on CSI and participants categorized as sensitized by experimental pain tests (p-value=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are consistent with previous studies, indicating that the CSI is related to psycho-social constructs. However, the convergent validity with experimental pain measures is small and probably not clinically meaningful.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过量化与疼痛敏感性的实验测量和自我报告的心理社会问卷的相关性,来检验中枢敏化量表的聚合效度,研究对象为腰痛人群。

方法

所有参与者均来自丹麦南部脊柱护理诊所(南部丹麦脊柱中心)的门诊。参与者接受了标准化的实验性疼痛测试方案,并完成了中枢敏化量表(CSI)以及其他自我报告问卷,以评估不同领域的心理社会结构。使用相关性和一致性检验分析 CSI 与实验性疼痛测量值和其他自我报告的心理社会问卷之间的关联。使用 ROC 曲线分析确定 CSI 的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

共纳入 168 名参与者。CSI 与实验性疼痛测试方案中的 20 个变量中的 9 个呈弱相关(rho 范围为-0.37 至 0.22)。CSI 与心理社会因素(如工作能力、残疾和疲惫障碍症状)的相关性更强。ROC 分析确定 CSI 的最佳截断值为 44(Sn=39.1% Sp=87.4%)。CSI 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.656。Fisher 精确检验表明,CSI 评分≥40 的参与者与通过实验性疼痛测试分类为敏感化的参与者之间存在统计学显著关联(p 值=0.03)。

结论

我们的研究结果与之前的研究一致,表明 CSI 与心理社会结构相关。然而,与实验性疼痛测量的聚合效度较小,可能没有临床意义。

相似文献

1
"Convergent validity of the central sensitization inventory and experimental testing of pain sensitivity".“中枢敏化量表和疼痛敏感性实验测试的会聚效度”。
Scand J Pain. 2021 Oct 19;22(3):597-613. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0090. Print 2022 Jul 26.
2
Convergent Validity of the Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory: Associations with Psychophysical Pain Measures, Quality of Life, Disability, and Pain Cognitions in Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain.荷兰中枢敏化量表的收敛效度:与慢性脊柱疼痛患者的心理物理疼痛测量、生活质量、残疾及疼痛认知的相关性
Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):777-787. doi: 10.1111/papr.12672. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Validity of the central sensitization inventory with measures of sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者的敏感化测量与中枢敏感化量表的有效性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Nov;37(11):3125-3132. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4279-8. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
4
The Central Sensitization Inventory and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: An exploration of construct validity and associations with widespread pain sensitivity among individuals with shoulder pain.中枢敏化量表和疼痛敏感性问卷:肩痛患者的结构效度及与广泛疼痛敏感性的相关性探索
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Aug;36:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Italian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory.《中央敏感化量表》意大利语版的跨文化调适与效度。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Oct;37:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Central Sensitization Inventory.《中央敏感化量表希腊语版的跨文化适应性和心理计量学特性》。
Pain Pract. 2020 Feb;20(2):188-196. doi: 10.1111/papr.12843. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Use of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) as a treatment outcome measure for patients with chronic spinal pain disorder in a functional restoration program.在功能恢复计划中,使用中央敏化量表(CSI)作为慢性脊柱疼痛障碍患者的治疗结果测量指标。
Spine J. 2017 Dec;17(12):1819-1829. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of Central Sensitization Inventory in Arabic language.阿拉伯语版中枢敏化症评定量表的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(25):8075-8083. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2006322. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
Quantitative Sensory Testing Discriminates Central Sensitization Inventory Scores in Participants with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: An Exploratory Study.定量感觉测试可区分慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的中枢敏感化量表评分:一项探索性研究。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jun;21(5):547-556. doi: 10.1111/papr.12990. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Serbian Version of the Central Sensitization Inventory.《中枢敏化症状清单塞尔维亚语版的聚合和区别效度》。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):724-736. doi: 10.1111/papr.12900. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures in chronic pain conditions with central sensitization- a systematic review and meta-analysis.中枢敏化慢性疼痛状况下患者报告结局指标的心理测量学特性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jul 11;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00919-9.
2
Catastrophizing as a Predictor for Pain Perception and Disability Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation.灾难化思维作为脊髓刺激治疗患者疼痛感知和残疾的预测指标。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 16;61(1):141. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010141.
3
Pain profiles and variability in temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation in pain-free individuals and patients with low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia.
无痛个体以及患有腰痛、骨关节炎和纤维肌痛的患者的疼痛特征、疼痛时间总和的变异性和条件性疼痛调制
Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4741. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4741. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory to Address Human Assumed Central Sensitization: Newly Proposed Clinically Relevant Values and Associations.中枢敏化量表用于评估人类假定的中枢敏化的效度:新提出的临床相关值及关联
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 23;12(14):4849. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144849.
5
Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial.脊骨疗法治疗慢性原发性下腰痛患者的机制:一项机制随机安慰剂对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e065999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065999.
6
Association between Experimental Pain Measurements and the Central Sensitization Inventory in Patients at Least 3 Months after COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.新冠病毒感染至少3个月后患者的实验性疼痛测量与中枢敏化量表之间的关联:一项横断面试点研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 13;12(2):661. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020661.
7
Pressure pain thresholds in a real-world chiropractic setting: topography, changes after treatment, and clinical relevance?真实世界的整脊环境中的压痛阈值:分布、治疗后变化及临床意义?
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 12;30(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00436-2.