Hintze Frederico, Machado Ricardo B, Bernard Enrico
Laboratório de Ciência Aplicada à Conservação da Biodiversidade, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0248797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248797. eCollection 2021.
Species distribution modelling (SDM) gained importance on biodiversity distribution and conservation studies worldwide, including prioritizing areas for public policies and international treaties. Useful for large-scale approaches and species distribution estimates, it is a plus considering that a minor fraction of the planet is adequately sampled. However, minimizing errors is challenging, but essential, considering the uses and consequences of such models. In situ validation of the SDM outputs should be a key-step-in some cases, urgent. Bioacoustics can be used to validate and refine those outputs, especially if the focal species' vocalizations are conspicuous and species-specific. This is the case of echolocating bats. Here, we used extensive acoustic monitoring (>120 validation points over an area of >758,000 km2, and producing >300,000 sound files) to validate MaxEnt outputs for six neotropical bat species in a poorly-sampled region of Brazil. Based on in situ validation, we evaluated four threshold-dependent theoretical evaluation metrics' ability in predicting models' performance. We also assessed the performance of three widely used thresholds to convert continuous SDMs into presence/absence maps. We demonstrated that MaxEnt produces very different outputs, requiring a careful choice on thresholds and modeling parameters. Although all theoretical evaluation metrics studied were positively correlated with accuracy, we empirically demonstrated that metrics based on specificity-sensitivity and sensitivity-precision are better for testing models, considering that most SDMs are based on unbalanced data. Without independent field validation, we found that using an arbitrary threshold for modelling can be a precarious approach with many possible outcomes, even after getting good evaluation scores. Bioacoustics proved to be important for validating SDMs for the six bat species analyzed, allowing a better refinement of SDMs in large and under-sampled regions, with relatively low sampling effort. Regardless of the species assessing method used, our research highlighted the vital necessity of in situ validation for SDMs.
物种分布模型(SDM)在全球范围内的生物多样性分布和保护研究中变得越来越重要,包括为公共政策和国际条约确定优先区域。它对于大规模方法和物种分布估计非常有用,考虑到地球上只有一小部分得到了充分的采样,这是一个加分项。然而,考虑到这些模型的用途和后果,最小化误差是具有挑战性的,但也是必不可少的。SDM 输出的现场验证应该是一个关键步骤——在某些情况下,甚至是紧急的。生物声学可用于验证和改进这些输出,特别是如果焦点物种的发声明显且具有特异性。这就是回声定位蝙蝠的情况。在这里,我们使用广泛的声学监测(在面积超过 758,000 平方公里的区域内超过 120 个验证点,产生超过 300,000 个声音文件)来验证巴西一个采样不足地区的六种新热带蝙蝠物种的 MaxEnt 输出。基于现场验证,我们评估了四个依赖于阈值的理论评估指标在预测模型性能方面的能力。我们还评估了三种广泛使用的阈值将连续 SDM 转换为存在/不存在图的性能。我们证明了 MaxEnt 产生非常不同的输出,需要仔细选择阈值和建模参数。尽管所有研究的理论评估指标都与准确性呈正相关,但我们通过实证证明,基于特异性-敏感性和敏感性-精度的指标更适合测试模型,因为大多数 SDM 都是基于不平衡的数据。如果没有独立的现场验证,我们发现对于建模使用任意阈值可能是一种危险的方法,即使获得了良好的评估分数,也可能会有许多可能的结果。生物声学对于验证我们分析的六种蝙蝠物种的 SDM 非常重要,允许在大而采样不足的区域中以相对较低的采样工作量更好地改进 SDM。无论使用哪种物种评估方法,我们的研究都强调了 SDM 现场验证的至关重要性。