A. Hart is director of research, Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, and emergency physician, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-2316 .
D. Romney is director of education, Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and instructor of emergency medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):577-585. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004463.
Telemedical applications have only recently begun to coalesce into the field of telemedicine due to varying definitions of telemedicine and issues around reimbursement. This process has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing expansion of telemedicine delivery. This article demonstrates the development of a set of proposed competencies for a telemedicine curriculum in graduate medical education.
A modified Delphi process was used to create a panel of competencies. This included a systematic review of the telemedicine literature through November 2019 to create an initial set of competencies, which were analyzed and edited by a focus group of experts in January 2020. Initial competencies were distributed in a series of 3 rounds of surveys to a group of 23 experts for comments and rating from April to August 2020. Competencies that obtained a score of 4.0 or greater on a 5-point Likert scale in at least 2 rounds were recommended.
Fifty-five competencies were developed based on the systematic review. A further 32 were added by the expert group for a total of 87. After 3 rounds of surveys, 34 competencies reached the recommendation threshold. These were 10 systems-based practice competencies, 7 professionalism, 6 patient care, 4 practice-based learning and improvement, 4 interpersonal and communication skills, and 3 medical knowledge competencies.
Half (17/34) of the competencies approved by the focus group and surveyed expert panel pertained to either systems-based practice or professionalism. Both categories exhibit more variation between telemedicine and in-person practice than other categories. The authors offer a set of proposed educational competencies that can be used in the development of curricula for a wide range of providers and are based on the best evidence and expert opinion available.
由于远程医疗的定义不同以及报销问题,远程医疗应用直到最近才开始合并为远程医疗领域。COVID-19 大流行加速了这一进程,远程医疗的应用随之扩大。本文展示了在研究生医学教育中远程医疗课程的一套拟议能力的发展。
采用改良 Delphi 法建立能力小组。这包括通过系统审查 2019 年 11 月之前的远程医疗文献,创建一组初始能力,然后由 2020 年 1 月的专家焦点小组进行分析和编辑。最初的能力在 2020 年 4 月至 8 月期间,通过一系列 3 轮调查分发给一组 23 名专家,征求意见和评分。在至少 2 轮中获得 5 分制 4.0 或更高分数的能力被推荐。
根据系统审查,制定了 55 项能力。专家组又增加了 32 项,共计 87 项。经过 3 轮调查,有 34 项能力达到推荐标准。其中包括 10 项基于系统的实践能力、7 项专业精神、6 项患者护理、4 项基于实践的学习和改进、4 项人际交往和沟通技巧以及 3 项医学知识能力。
专家组和调查专家小组批准的能力中有一半(17/34)涉及基于系统的实践或专业精神。这两个类别比其他类别在远程医疗和现场实践之间表现出更多的差异。作者提供了一套拟议的教育能力,可以用于为广泛的提供者制定课程,并且基于现有的最佳证据和专家意见。