• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微螺纹设计对即刻种植体周围边缘骨保存效果的影响:一项为期 5 年的前瞻性队列研究。

Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Periodontics Department, Dental Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Periodontics Department, Dental Implant Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Dental Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01881-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-021-01881-w
PMID:34670544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8529818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the microthread design at the implant neck on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately-placed implants in a 5-year follow up.

METHODS

Thirty patients received 41 immediately placed implants which were randomly assigned to treatment groups with microthreaded implants (test group, n = 22) or threaded implants (control group, n = 19). Clinical and radiographic analyses were carried out after 1 and5 years. Plaque index, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing depth and marginal bone loss were subject to evaluations. The results were analyzed with the T-test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

No implants failed; thirty-five implants (in 27 patients); 21 microthreaded and 14 threaded implants; completed the 5 year follow up. The mean values of the marginal bone loss in microthreaded and threaded groups were 1.12 ± 0.95 mm and 0.87 ± 0.78 mm, respectively during an observation period of 70.9 ± 10.4 months; the differences in marginal bone loss and other pre-implant parameters were not significant between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both implant designs showed acceptable results in terms of the clinical parameters and marginal bone level. Within the limitation of this study, the results did not demonstrate any superiority of the microthread design compared to threaded one in marginal bone preservation around immediately placed implants over 5 years of loading.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估种植体颈部的微螺纹设计对即刻植入后 5 年边缘骨保留的影响。

方法

30 名患者共植入 41 颗即刻种植体,随机分为微螺纹种植体(试验组,n=22)和螺纹种植体(对照组,n=19)两组。分别于术后 1 年和 5 年进行临床和影像学分析。评估菌斑指数、探诊出血、溢脓、探诊深度和边缘骨丧失。采用 T 检验、Fisher 确切检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验对结果进行分析。

结果

无种植体失败;35 颗种植体(27 名患者);21 颗微螺纹种植体和 14 颗螺纹种植体;完成了 5 年随访。微螺纹组和螺纹组的边缘骨丧失平均值分别为 1.12±0.95mm 和 0.87±0.78mm,观察期为 70.9±10.4 个月;两组边缘骨丧失和其他植入前参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

两种种植体设计在临床参数和边缘骨水平方面均表现出良好的效果。在本研究的限制范围内,结果并未显示微螺纹设计在 5 年负荷期内对即刻植入种植体周围边缘骨保留有任何优于螺纹设计的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/5a5e6124e8de/12903_2021_1881_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/d081dc395628/12903_2021_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/ed085d45cfde/12903_2021_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/af6cb3dcab81/12903_2021_1881_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/5a5e6124e8de/12903_2021_1881_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/d081dc395628/12903_2021_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/ed085d45cfde/12903_2021_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/af6cb3dcab81/12903_2021_1881_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f710/8529818/5a5e6124e8de/12903_2021_1881_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study.微螺纹设计对即刻种植体周围边缘骨保存效果的影响:一项为期 5 年的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01881-w.
2
Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: a 1-year prospective study after loading.基于微螺纹位置的种植体周边缘骨丧失的对比分析:加载后 1 年的前瞻性研究。
J Periodontol. 2009 Dec;80(12):1937-44. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090330.
3
Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible.种植体设计对下颌骨边缘骨保存的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Jun 1;12(2):134-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
4
Peri-implant bone loss clinical and radiographic evaluation around rough neck and microthread implants: a 5-year study.种植体周围骨丧失的临床和影像学评估:粗糙颈部和微螺纹种植体周围 5 年研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):635-643. doi: 10.1111/clr.12775. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs.使用数字化全景X线片对平行螺纹圆柱加工颈种植体和粗糙表面微螺纹种植体周围边缘骨水平进行影像学评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):550-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01684.x. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
6
Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.种植体植入1年后不同颈部设计种植体周围边缘骨水平的影像学评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):789-94.
7
One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.一体式氧化锆口腔种植体:一项前瞻性病例系列研究的一年结果。2. 三单位固定义齿(FDP)修复。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 May;40(5):553-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12093. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Immediate loading of Brånemark implants: a 24-month follow-up of a comparative prospective pilot study between mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants.Branemark种植体即刻负重:一项关于圆锥形穿黏膜种植体和标准MK II种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的前瞻性对比试验性研究的24个月随访
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(4):190-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00171.x.
9
A 3-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems.三种不同种植系统边缘骨水平的 3 年前瞻性放射学评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):538-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02083.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
10
Comparative Results of Single Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Placed and Loaded with Different Protocols: A Long-Term (7 to 10 years) Retrospective Multicenter Study.单植入体比较研究:有无激光微螺纹颈圈植入及不同负载方案的长期(7-10 年)回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):841-849. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7605.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Implant with Porous Structure and Anchorage: Design and Bench Testing in a Calf Rib Model Study.具有多孔结构和锚固功能的牙种植体:在小牛肋骨模型研究中的设计与台架试验
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;18(3):700. doi: 10.3390/ma18030700.
2
Influence of rough micro-threaded and laser micro-textured implant-neck on peri-implant tissues: A systematic review.粗糙微螺纹和激光微纹理种植体颈部对种植体周围组织的影响:一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):602-613. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
Exploring the Importance of Corticalization Occurring in Alveolar Bone Surrounding a Dental Implant.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of implant neck microthread design on stress distribution of peri-implant bone with different level: A finite element analysis.种植体颈部微螺纹设计对不同水平种植体周围骨应力分布的影响:有限元分析
J Dent Sci. 2020 Dec;15(4):466-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
2
Marginal Bone Loss around Machined Smooth Neck Implants Compared to Rough Threaded Neck Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机加工光滑颈种植体与粗糙螺纹颈种植体周围边缘骨丢失的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;30(5):401-411. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13333. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Reporting and handling of incomplete outcome data in implant dentistry: A survey of randomized clinical trials.
探讨种植体周围牙槽骨中发生皮质骨化的重要性。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 2;11(23):7189. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237189.
种植体牙科中结局数据缺失的报告和处理:一项随机临床试验的调查。
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Feb;47(2):257-266. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13222. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Implant-abutment connection as contributing factor to peri-implant diseases.种植体-基台连接是导致种植体周围疾病的因素之一。
Periodontol 2000. 2019 Oct;81(1):152-166. doi: 10.1111/prd.12289.
5
Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.有限元模型在种植牙科中的应用:一项系统评价。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S85-S91. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_296_18.
6
Influence of implant neck and abutment characteristics on peri-implant tissue health and stability. Oral reconstruction foundation consensus report.种植体颈部和基台特征对种植体周围组织健康和稳定性的影响。口腔重建基金会共识报告。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jun;30(6):588-593. doi: 10.1111/clr.13439. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Ridge alterations after implant placement in fresh extraction sockets or in healed crests: An experimental in vivo investigation.种植体植入新鲜拔牙窝或愈合牙槽嵴后牙槽嵴的改建:一项体内实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Apr;30(4):353-363. doi: 10.1111/clr.13421. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with large bony defects at time of immediate implant placement: A 1-year cohort study.即刻种植即刻负重时上颌前牙区大骨缺损患者种植体颊侧骨厚度的 1 年队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):73-79. doi: 10.1111/cid.12701. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: A systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels.不同领口设计和表面改性的钛牙科种植体:存活率和边缘骨水平的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jan;30(1):20-48. doi: 10.1111/clr.13389. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design.口腔种植修复中,与非渐细设计相比,渐细设计的种植体在临床和患者报告结局方面的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:41-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.13128.