Suppr超能文献

儿科外科诊所是否包容 LGBTQ+群体?

Are pediatric surgery clinics LGBTQ+ inclusive?

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, PennState Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.

PennState College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan;57(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Creating inclusive LGBTQ+ environments is important in the provision of inclusive care. This cross sectional study assessed whether patient intake forms in pediatric surgery departments were LGBTQ+ inclusive (L-I).

METHODS

North American pediatric surgery departments affiliated with pediatric surgery fellowships or general surgery residencies were contacted to retrieve patient intake forms. Forms were assessed for LGBTQ+ inclusivity using a novel L-I scoring system consisting of 6 criteria: preferred name, pronouns, preferred language, gender identity, sex assigned at birth, and l-I guardianship. Institutions without intake forms were invited to comment on their use of l-I intake questions.

RESULTS

59/125 programs responded to our query, 10 of which provided intake forms. Median l-I score was 2/6 points (range 1-4). l-I guardianship was the most common question asked. No intake form asked for pronouns. Of the 49 institutions without forms, 30.5% reported asking l-I questions during initial visits. Narratives from these institutions varied widely. Some institutions supported routine l-I questions while others stated l-I questions were unnecessary, irrelevant, and/or offensive.

CONCLUSIONS

Few North American pediatric surgery departments consistently ask l-I questions during the intake process. Comments questioning the appropriateness and necessity of l-I questions highlight the need for LGBTQ+ education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Cross sectional study.

摘要

目的

在提供包容的护理中,创建包容 LGBTQ+的环境很重要。本横断面研究评估了小儿外科部门的患者入院表格是否包含 LGBTQ+信息(L-I)。

方法

联系了与小儿外科学会或普通外科学会相关的北美小儿外科部门,以获取患者入院表格。使用一种新的 L-I 评分系统,该系统由 6 个标准组成,包括:首选姓名、代词、首选语言、性别认同、出生时的性别和 L-I 监护权,对表格进行了 LGBTQ+包容性评估。没有入院表格的机构被邀请对其使用 L-I 入院问题发表评论。

结果

125 个项目中有 59 个对我们的查询做出了回应,其中 10 个提供了入院表格。L-I 评分中位数为 2/6 分(范围 1-4)。L-I 监护权是最常见的问题。没有入院表格询问代词。在没有表格的 49 个机构中,30.5%的机构报告在初次就诊时询问了 L-I 问题。这些机构的叙述差异很大。一些机构支持常规的 L-I 问题,而另一些机构则表示 L-I 问题是不必要的、不相关的和/或冒犯性的。

结论

北美小儿外科部门在入院过程中很少有系统地询问 L-I 问题。质疑 L-I 问题是否合适和必要的评论突出了 LGBTQ+教育的必要性。

证据水平

III 级。

研究类型

横断面研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验