• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[1981年至1985年间头孢替安对各种临床分离株的抗菌活性]

[Antimicrobial activity of cefotiam against various clinical isolates from 1981 to 1985].

作者信息

Matsuo K, Uete T

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Aug;39(8):1981-7.

PMID:3467078
Abstract

Some of new cephem antibiotics, particularly the so called the third generation cephalosporins, are reported to be potent inducers of beta-lactamases and to be responsible for developing microbial cross-resistance to multiple beta-lactam antibiotics and occasionally to the aminoglycosides (Sanders and Sanders, 1983). In Japan, third generation cephalosporins such as cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, and latamoxef became available in 1981, and cefmenoxime in 1982. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate changes, if any, in the antimicrobial activity of cefotiam (CTM) against various Gram-positive and negative bacteria, particularly to determine whether its antimicrobial activity has been reduced since 1982. Susceptibilities of clinical isolates of S. aureus (1,776 strains), S. epidermidis (2,247), S. pneumoniae (160), S. pyogenes (108), E. faecalis (1,930), E. coli (2,024), K. pneumoniae (1,913), Proteus spp. (950), E. aerogenes (823), Serratia marcescens (1,160), Citrobacter spp. (303), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2,824), and H. influenzae (396) to CTM were studied. It was found that susceptibilities of these clinical isolates to CTM were not altered from 1981 to 1985, except S. marcescens. In 1985, susceptible strains of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes and E. faecalis were 93.8, 93.4, 100, 100 and 0%, respectively. Those of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus spp., H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa, S. marcescens, E. aerogenes and Citrobacter spp. were 97.9, 97.7, 89.4, 94, 0, 10.8, 45.9 and 74.5%, respectively. The rate of susceptible strains of S. marcescens decreased from 34.7 to 10.8% since 1981 to 1985.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

据报道,一些新型头孢菌素抗生素,特别是所谓的第三代头孢菌素,是β-内酰胺酶的强效诱导剂,会导致微生物对多种β-内酰胺抗生素产生交叉耐药性,偶尔也会对氨基糖苷类抗生素产生交叉耐药性(桑德斯和桑德斯,1983年)。在日本,第三代头孢菌素如头孢噻肟、头孢哌酮、头孢唑肟和拉氧头孢于1981年上市,头孢甲肟于1982年上市。因此,研究头孢替安(CTM)对各种革兰氏阳性和阴性细菌的抗菌活性是否发生变化(如果有变化的话),特别是确定自1982年以来其抗菌活性是否降低,是很有意义的。研究了金黄色葡萄球菌(1776株)、表皮葡萄球菌(2247株)、肺炎链球菌(160株)、化脓性链球菌(108株)、粪肠球菌(1930株)、大肠杆菌(2024株)、肺炎克雷伯菌(1913株)、变形杆菌属(950株)、产气肠杆菌(823株)、粘质沙雷氏菌(1160株)、柠檬酸杆菌属(303株)、铜绿假单胞菌(2824株)和流感嗜血杆菌(396株)临床分离株对CTM的敏感性。结果发现,除粘质沙雷氏菌外,这些临床分离株对CTM的敏感性在1981年至1985年间没有改变。1985年,金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌、化脓性链球菌和粪肠球菌的敏感菌株分别为93.8%、93.4%、100%、100%和0%。大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、变形杆菌属、流感嗜血杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、粘质沙雷氏菌、产气肠杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌属的敏感菌株分别为97.9%、97.7%、89.4%、94%、0%、10.8%、45.9%和74.5%。自1981年至1985年,粘质沙雷氏菌的敏感菌株率从34.7%降至10.8%。(摘要截短为250字)

相似文献

1
[Antimicrobial activity of cefotiam against various clinical isolates from 1981 to 1985].[1981年至1985年间头孢替安对各种临床分离株的抗菌活性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Aug;39(8):1981-7.
2
[The antibacterial activity of new cephem antibiotics against clinical isolates. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of cefotaxime with 6 other antibiotics].[新型头孢菌素类抗生素对临床分离株的抗菌活性。头孢噻肟与其他6种抗生素抗菌活性的比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Feb;36(2):260-76.
3
[Comparison of sensitivity patterns of bacteria isolated from clinical materials to the 2d generation cephamycins and cephalosporins and clinical application of these antibiotics].[从临床材料中分离出的细菌对第二代头孢霉素和头孢菌素的敏感性模式比较以及这些抗生素的临床应用]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jul;36(7):1621-37.
4
[Comparison of in vitro activity of first, second and third generation cephem antibiotics against various pathogens isolated from clinical materials in 1983].[1983年第一代、第二代和第三代头孢菌素类抗生素对从临床材料中分离出的各种病原体的体外活性比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Jun;37(6):1040-57.
5
[Clinical laboratory approach for determination of effective dose of cefotiam. Observation from disc susceptibility test and MICs].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1982 Jun;35(6):1441-61.
6
[Antimicrobial activity of sulbactam/cefoperazone. Comparison with other new cephems].舒巴坦/头孢哌酮的抗菌活性。与其他新型头孢菌素的比较
Jpn J Antibiot. 1987 Oct;40(10):1752-61.
7
[Comparative studies of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1984). I. Susceptibility distribution].[1984年针对从尿路感染中分离出的病原体的抗菌药物比较研究。I. 药敏分布]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Nov;39(11):2959-3006.
8
[Antibacterial activities of new cephems against clinically isolated organisms (author's transl)].新型头孢菌素对临床分离菌的抗菌活性(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1982 Apr;35(4):1009-21.
9
[Susceptibility of bacteria isolated from lower respiratory tract infections to antibiotics (1983)].[从下呼吸道感染分离出的细菌对抗生素的敏感性(1983年)]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1985 Nov;38(11):3119-44.
10
[Sensitivity of the recent bacterial isolates to cefotaxime and other cephem antibiotics].[近期分离出的细菌对头孢噻肟及其他头孢菌素类抗生素的敏感性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Oct;36(10):2887-92.