• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[近期分离出的细菌对头孢噻肟及其他头孢菌素类抗生素的敏感性]

[Sensitivity of the recent bacterial isolates to cefotaxime and other cephem antibiotics].

作者信息

Fujita S, Yoshida T, Okado N, Matsubara F

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Oct;36(10):2887-92.

PMID:6325747
Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility of 703 nonselected strains of 14 different bacterial species to cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotiam, cefoperazone latamoxef, and cefotaxime (CTX) was examined. CTX was the most active against E. coli, Klebsiella, Serratia, P. mirabilis, H. influenzae, beta-Streptococcus group A, beta-Streptococcus group B and S. pneumoniae. On the other hand, CTX-resistant (MIC greater than or equal to 50 micrograms/ml) strains were isolated at the following frequencies: Citrobacter, 21.7%; Enterobacter, 7.7%; Serratia, 4.6%; P. aeruginosa, 40.4% and B. fragilis, 28.6%. Of the 411 strains classified as very sensitive () or moderately sensitive (++) by disk method, 405 strains (98.5%) were inhibited by less than or equal to 12.5 micrograms/ml of CTX. Only 1 strain (0.2%) was falsely classified as moderately sensitive and no strains were falsely categorized as resistant.

摘要

检测了14种不同细菌的703株未经选择的菌株对头孢唑林、头孢美唑、头孢替安、头孢哌酮、拉氧头孢和头孢噻肟(CTX)的药敏情况。CTX对大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌属、沙雷菌属、奇异变形杆菌、流感嗜血杆菌、A组β溶血性链球菌、B组β溶血性链球菌和肺炎链球菌活性最强。另一方面,CTX耐药(最低抑菌浓度大于或等于50微克/毫升)菌株的分离频率如下:柠檬酸杆菌属,21.7%;肠杆菌属,7.7%;沙雷菌属,4.6%;铜绿假单胞菌,40.4%;脆弱拟杆菌,28.6%。在通过纸片法分类为极敏感()或中度敏感(++)的411株菌株中,405株(98.5%)被小于或等于12.5微克/毫升的CTX抑制。仅1株(0.2%)被错误分类为中度敏感,无菌株被错误分类为耐药。

相似文献

1
[Sensitivity of the recent bacterial isolates to cefotaxime and other cephem antibiotics].[近期分离出的细菌对头孢噻肟及其他头孢菌素类抗生素的敏感性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Oct;36(10):2887-92.
2
[The antibacterial activity of new cephem antibiotics against clinical isolates. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of cefotaxime with 6 other antibiotics].[新型头孢菌素类抗生素对临床分离株的抗菌活性。头孢噻肟与其他6种抗生素抗菌活性的比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Feb;36(2):260-76.
3
[Comparison of in vitro activity of first, second and third generation cephem antibiotics against various pathogens isolated from clinical materials in 1983].[1983年第一代、第二代和第三代头孢菌素类抗生素对从临床材料中分离出的各种病原体的体外活性比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Jun;37(6):1040-57.
4
[Antibacterial activities of monobactams against fresh clinical isolates].单环β-内酰胺类抗生素对临床新鲜分离株的抗菌活性
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Nov;41(11):1600-22.
5
[Comparison of sensitivity patterns of bacteria isolated from clinical materials to the 2d generation cephamycins and cephalosporins and clinical application of these antibiotics].[从临床材料中分离出的细菌对第二代头孢霉素和头孢菌素的敏感性模式比较以及这些抗生素的临床应用]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jul;36(7):1621-37.
6
[Antimicrobial activity of cefotiam against various clinical isolates from 1981 to 1985].[1981年至1985年间头孢替安对各种临床分离株的抗菌活性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Aug;39(8):1981-7.
7
[Antimicrobial activity of cefodizime against clinical isolates].头孢地嗪对临床分离株的抗菌活性
Jpn J Antibiot. 1996 Oct;49(10):947-65.
8
[Antimicrobial activity of sulbactam/cefoperazone. Comparison with other new cephems].舒巴坦/头孢哌酮的抗菌活性。与其他新型头孢菌素的比较
Jpn J Antibiot. 1987 Oct;40(10):1752-61.
9
[Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from surgical infections (first report)].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Oct;39(10):2557-78.
10
[Antimicrobial activity of cefodizime against fresh clinical isolates].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1993 Oct;46(10):860-76.