Kirch Sam, Gorus Ellen, Brys Charlotte, Cornelis Elise, De Vriendt Patricia
Gerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Frailty in Ageing (FRIA) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Aug;9(4):455-466. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0066-y. Epub 2018 May 15.
A variety of screening, diagnostic and assessment tools have been developed for use in dementia research and care. However, there is no consensus which tool to use and moreover there is no transparency in communication between countries and disciplines.
To contribute to a more uniform assessment in dementia, the Cambridge Cognition Examination (CAMCOG) was converted to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
In a qualitative design, CAMCOG-items and -scoring-system were converted to the ICF addressing 3 ICF domains: global and specific mental functions and general tasks and demands. Construct and discriminative validity was checked in a sample of 25 cognitively healthy elderly (CHE), 25 persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 25 patients with mild Alzheimer's Disease (mAD).
A significant correlation was observed between CAMCOG/ICF-CAMCOG (r = - 0.987; p < 0.01). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the ICF-CAMCOG were between 0.819 and 0.978; comparable with the original CAMCOG. Only a significant difference between the AUC of the CHE versus MCI (0.911 vs. 0.819; p = 0.0094) was observed in favour of CAMCOG.
The clinical use of the ICF-CAMCOG looks promising offering a more detailed and interpretable scoring and may allow for better planning of resources to aid patients with dementia.
已开发出多种筛查、诊断和评估工具用于痴呆症研究与护理。然而,对于使用哪种工具尚无共识,而且国家和学科之间的交流缺乏透明度。
为了在痴呆症评估中实现更统一的标准,将剑桥认知检查(CAMCOG)转换为《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。
采用定性设计,将CAMCOG的项目和评分系统转换为ICF,涉及3个ICF领域:整体和特定心理功能以及一般任务和要求。在25名认知健康的老年人(CHE)、25名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和25名轻度阿尔茨海默病(mAD)患者的样本中检查了结构效度和区分效度。
观察到CAMCOG/ICF-CAMCOG之间存在显著相关性(r = - 0.987;p < 0.01)。ICF-CAMCOG的曲线下面积(AUC)在0.819至0.978之间;与原始CAMCOG相当。仅观察到CHE与MCI的AUC之间存在显著差异(0.911对0.819;p = 0.0094),支持CAMCOG。
ICF-CAMCOG的临床应用前景广阔,提供了更详细且可解释的评分,可能有助于更好地规划资源以帮助痴呆症患者。