Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, 1149 Newell Drive, L4-100, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Biomark Med. 2021 Dec;15(18):1721-1732. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2021-0284. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
There is a critical need to validate biofluid-based biomarkers as diagnostic and drug development tools for traumatic brain injury (TBI). As part of the TBI Endpoints Development Initiative, we identified four potentially predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for TBI: astroglial markers GFAP and S100B and the neuronal markers UCH-L1 and Tau. Several commonly used platforms for these four biomarkers were identified and compared on analytic performance and ability to detect gold standard recombinant protein antigens and to pool control versus TBI cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). For each marker, only some assay formats could differentiate TBI CSF from the control CSF. Also, different assays for the same biomarker reported divergent biomarker values for the same biosamples. Due to the variability of TBI marker assay in performance and reported values, standardization strategies are recommended when comparing reported biomarker levels across assay platforms.
迫切需要验证基于生物流体的生物标志物,将其作为创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的诊断和药物开发工具。作为 TBI 终点开发计划的一部分,我们确定了四个具有潜在预测性和药效学的 TBI 生物标志物:星形胶质细胞标志物 GFAP 和 S100B 以及神经元标志物 UCH-L1 和 Tau。 鉴定了用于这四个生物标志物的几种常用平台,并在分析性能以及检测金标准重组蛋白抗原的能力以及汇集对照与 TBI 脑脊液 (CSF) 方面进行了比较。 对于每种标志物,只有某些检测方法能够区分 TBI CSF 与对照 CSF。此外,对于同一生物标志物的不同检测方法报告了同一生物样本的不同生物标志物值。 由于 TBI 标志物检测在性能和报告值方面存在差异,因此建议在比较不同检测平台的报告生物标志物水平时采用标准化策略。